14:32 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:32 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:32:32 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:32 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:32 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer mylesjp pushkarnk ( dviererbe )
14:32 <joalif> o/
14:32 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
14:32 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:32 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:32 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:33 <cpaelzer> what do we have today ...
14:33 <cpaelzer> non-proposed is all fine
14:33 <cpaelzer> only usual suspects
14:33 <cpaelzer> and proposed only has the ruby-rack related
14:33 <cpaelzer> which IIRC Renan filed and joalif is reviwing
14:33 <joalif> pasting the review as we speak
14:34 <cpaelzer> let me ask renan if rackup is also needed
14:34 <cpaelzer> done
14:34 <cpaelzer> Thanks joalif
14:34 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
14:34 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
14:34 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:35 <cpaelzer> we have one case
14:35 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils-from/+bug/2110879
14:35 <cpaelzer> this is not yet the big chunk of rust coreutils
14:35 <slyon> Julian talked to me about this during the sprint. It's a pro forma MIR (optional), as it was already promoted to main
14:35 <cpaelzer> but essentially the official way of Jon's oxidizer
14:35 <slyon> It's rather minimal, primarily shipping symlinks
14:35 <cpaelzer> yes, that is what I see too
14:35 <cpaelzer> I didn't realize it was in main before
14:36 <cpaelzer> but that should most likely make it a fast path
14:36 <cpaelzer> being the only case to share, anyone volunteering?
14:37 <cpaelzer> *crickets* - ok so it is me I guess
14:37 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
14:37 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:37 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:38 <cpaelzer> two recent cases
14:38 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roman-numerals/+bug/2110098
14:38 <cpaelzer> seems the path was not to do a MIR but to drop the dependency
14:38 <cpaelzer> pushkarnk: is that right?
14:38 <slyon> That seems resolved, right pushkarnk ? We could mark roman-numerals as "Invalid"
14:39 <cpaelzer> if so I tihnk we can unsubscribe
14:39 <pushkarnk> Yes right cpaelzer
14:39 <cpaelzer> thanks, fone
14:39 <cpaelzer> done even
14:39 <cpaelzer> and
14:39 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+bug/2071717
14:39 <cpaelzer> which is an info about soon resolving incompleteness
14:39 <cpaelzer> good
14:40 <sarnold> yay apparmor profiles
14:40 <cpaelzer> as it is meant to be
14:40 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
14:40 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
14:41 <cpaelzer> nothing really new except one
14:41 <cpaelzer> which is entertaining
14:41 <cpaelzer> https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/86
14:41 <sarnold> she's right, too
14:41 <cpaelzer> I think, once we are on the new place of ubuntu project docs this could be done
14:42 <cpaelzer> we then will have individual pages for the templates due to the diataxis split
14:42 <sarnold> it'd be worth keeping in mind that anchor tags are the most wonderful things ever when shoving it into the new ubuntu docs thingy
14:42 <cpaelzer> which means either we can make it the actual content and have anchors - or if that isn't doable at least we could enumerate the rules in the template
14:42 <cpaelzer> and then allow humans to refer to page + index
14:42 <cpaelzer> I discussed that with her at the sprint and both options seemed fine
14:43 <cpaelzer> I also love the comment to our bot telling to attend IRC meetings :-)
14:43 <sarnold> -1 on enumeration, those change; at least the horrible "search for this text" is much less likely to be changed
14:43 <cpaelzer> true, enumeration is only a fallback in my mind if all else fails
14:43 <cpaelzer> but it needs to be easily copy-able which I'm not sure if it goes well with putting anchors in
14:44 <sarnold> hmm. good point.
14:44 <cpaelzer> ok for now
14:44 <cpaelzer> I answered on the issue
14:45 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
14:45 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
14:45 <cpaelzer> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.
14:45 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0
14:45 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0
14:45 <cpaelzer> Internal link
14:45 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
14:45 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
14:45 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
14:45 <cpaelzer> if things continue to come slowly and you can contine progress ... it almost feels you can clear the queue sarnold !
14:45 <cpaelzer> rust-hwlib was done, I think you can set that complete
14:45 <cpaelzer> it has some detours which will make it contian less
14:46 <slyon> rust-hwlib is still pending security review IIRC
14:46 <cpaelzer> but the security review was done, or was that for hte "re-review now that the former is fixed"
14:46 <sarnold> oh can we? I thought rodrigo said that it still needed some reviews, and he'll be away for two weeks, so he was offering it around
14:46 <slyon> it had a brief check-up done. Needs a full re-review
14:46 <cpaelzer> got it, then all in the right state
14:46 <slyon> with the reviewer being on vacation, currently.
14:46 <cpaelzer> anything else here?
14:46 <sarnold> I shall also be on vacation for two weeks Real Soon Now
14:47 <sarnold> so our chance to zero the queue seems thin :( I really liked that idea
14:47 <cpaelzer> let me have hope :-P
14:47 <sarnold> :)
14:47 <cpaelzer> but TBH enjoy the time off
14:47 <sarnold> ty :)
14:47 <cpaelzer> there will be more for you when you come back, I'm sure :-)
14:47 <sarnold> yes
14:47 <cpaelzer> let us go on here then
14:47 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
14:47 <bdrung> Hi, I like to bring up Dracut (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dracut/+bug/2031304) We want to make it the default this cycle.
14:48 <cpaelzer> hi bdrung, I've heard about it - any particular special challenges?
14:48 <cpaelzer> reading ...
14:48 <bdrung> Dracut was reviewed for dracut-install and partially (?) for the whole Dracut.
14:49 <cpaelzer> some checks are all of the source by concept, but things like dependencies would only have considered dracut-install indeed
14:49 <sarnold> it looks like several "Later TODOs:" were added before moving to dracut more generally
14:49 <cpaelzer> so you are asking for a re-review with ?all? or another subset?
14:50 <sarnold> which of these later todos have been todone?
14:50 <cpaelzer> yep, later todo are #3-#6
14:50 <bdrung> Yes, a re-review with ?all? would be nice (to be on the safe side).
14:51 <bdrung> dracut-cpio was not built (my personal goal is to use 3cpio soon[TM])
14:51 <cpaelzer> can you give the answers if (or when and how) #3-#6 have been addressed on the bug
14:51 <sarnold> lol 3cpio
14:51 <cpaelzer> we will look for a volunteer here now to re-review ...
14:51 <cpaelzer> joalif: just had one, pushkarnk would you be open to have a look
14:52 <cpaelzer> since it was reviewed before this would mostly be for any recent oddity and dependencies
14:52 <pushkarnk> I can take a look
14:52 <cpaelzer> thanks
14:52 <bdrung> the dependencies are fixed (#6)
14:53 <cpaelzer> I set the state back and assigne pushkarnk
14:53 <bdrung> thanks
14:53 <pushkarnk> cpaelzer: ack
14:53 <cpaelzer> bdrung: that sounds good, if all are good just report them on the bug - but if one is like "hell now we won't do ..." then speak up here for discussion
14:54 <bdrung> one topic I haven't looked into is the netplan interaction
14:54 <cpaelzer> while you are thinking to answer that - I still need access to the ubuntu social photo (or be told where I missed the ping)
14:55 <cpaelzer> ok, give it a look and answer on the case then once you had a chance
14:55 <bdrung> cpaelzer, I pasted the ubuntu social photos in the frankfurt MM channel
14:55 <cpaelzer> ah there, thanks will look for it ...
14:56 <cpaelzer> I think we need to rush to the end of the meeting, but I wanted to thank bdrung - bringing it up early and then asking for re-review when extending is so nice and so how it should be. Thanks!
14:56 <slyon> bdrung: We don't have Netplan in initrd IIRC. I remember ogayot investigating that situation. Also, there a community project: https://github.com/danielkza/dracut-netplan
14:57 <cpaelzer> anoth aob topic, FYI I made pushkarnk and myles team members on LP to allow ACLs to be based on it. As discussed in the sprint ,the actual learning is shadow into then autonomously doing reviews.
14:57 <sarnold> ack
14:57 <bdrung> slyon, may I ask you to look into the dracut/netplan and comment on the MIR?
14:57 <slyon> ack
14:57 <pushkarnk> ack cpaelzer, thanks!
14:58 <slyon> bdrung: yes, I can put my thoughts there!
14:58 <bdrung> cpaelzer, suggestions for future MIR meeting: Add one topic at the beginning of the meeting to allow outsider to push topics to the agenda.
14:58 <bdrung> thanks slyon
14:58 <cpaelzer> that is a good idea
14:59 <cpaelzer> we might - once we know - pull them forward or anything else
14:59 <sarnold> yes. it even matches common practice
14:59 <cpaelzer> do you feel like posting a PR for it?
14:59 <cpaelzer> or more like raising it here and let it be our task?
14:59 <pushkarnk> +1 for an external agenda item :)
14:59 <cpaelzer> next meeting is rushing me ... I need to count out
14:59 <bdrung> cpaelzer, is the meeting agenda in some git?
14:59 <cpaelzer> yes
14:59 <cpaelzer> https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir#mir-team-weekly-status-meeting
15:00 <cpaelzer> counting .... and thanking you all
15:00 <cpaelzer> 4242
15:00 <cpaelzer> 256
15:00 <cpaelzer> 5
15:00 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting