14:31 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:31 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:31:05 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:31 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:31 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage pushkarnk ( dviererbe ) 14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches 14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> enough pings, now let things settle for a minute 14:31 <slyon> o/ 14:31 <cpaelzer> I assume/hope those views are rather clean these days 14:31 <cpaelzer> arr, the one left is still server 14:31 <cpaelzer> on ruby 14:32 <cpaelzer> I've resolved all the other ones when renan filed the removals 14:32 <cpaelzer> let me ping him 14:33 <cpaelzer> sorry - extra delay 14:33 <sarnold> and will the archive admins sort out linux-realtime as a normal part of their work? 14:33 <sarnold> or do we need to ask someone to handle this specifically before release? 14:33 <cpaelzer> the kernel-AAs would 14:34 <cpaelzer> like in apw and tjaaltonen 14:34 <joalif> o/ 14:34 <cpaelzer> I passed the Q on ruby-sinatra 14:35 <cpaelzer> but TBH it will99% just remove the proposed v and be ok for now 14:35 <cpaelzer> ok stared long enough at this list 14:35 <cpaelzer> next ... 14:35 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs 14:35 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:35 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 <cpaelzer> empty 14:36 <sarnold> \o/ 14:36 <cpaelzer> next ... 14:36 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:36 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:36 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 <cpaelzer> rust-sequpia we talked alst week 14:36 <cpaelzer> allo others gone 14:37 <cpaelzer> because a few othes like highway and jpeg-xl made it comepletely through, jbicha prepared and I fixed the component mismatch 14:37 <cpaelzer> so this looks good too 14:37 <sarnold> I'm surprised linuxptp didn't make it through 14:38 <cpaelzer> didn't see it anywhere recently 14:38 <cpaelzer> but yeah the team started very strong 14:38 <cpaelzer> and just had a few open to resolve things 14:38 <cpaelzer> IIRC 14:38 <cpaelzer> well, there always is a next release 14:38 <cpaelzer> BTW update on ruby-sinatra - maybe jbicha can help 14:38 <cpaelzer> it seems it was synced from Debian on Apr 3rd 14:39 <cpaelzer> Renan will contact you to sort if this should be cleaned or if there was a reason we didn't see 14:39 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:39 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:39 <cpaelzer> on the issues, not priority 14:39 <cpaelzer> looking for volunteers 14:39 <cpaelzer> feel free to do so if you are bored :-P 14:39 <cpaelzer> on the PRs 14:40 <cpaelzer> the state SLO is new'ish and had feedback 14:40 <cpaelzer> let us vote on that one 14:40 <cpaelzer> oh no, that was the one without feedback yet 14:40 <cpaelzer> so let me trigger your awareness 14:40 <cpaelzer> we have defined how much we want to be able to do as a minimum 14:40 <cpaelzer> security has their own queue and challenge to handle ti 14:41 <cpaelzer> hi sarnold on that 14:41 <cpaelzer> but for the MIR team itself 14:41 <cpaelzer> we said 1 per week per attendee as the goal - more if we can 14:41 <cpaelzer> and I thought we could put that down 14:41 <cpaelzer> for transparency 14:41 <cpaelzer> This is what I wanted to achieve 14:41 <cpaelzer> have a look when you have time and let me know what you tihnk 14:41 <sarnold> we have some words somewhere in this thing about MIRs filed too late needing security director conversation -- we don't currently have a security director :( -- but I wonder if that ought to move to this section? 14:42 <cpaelzer> yeah to escalate go to security director 14:42 <cpaelzer> I agree this is essentially your side of the SLO 14:42 <cpaelzer> let me move it 14:43 <cpaelzer> also - having none means someone is interim * and that will be the person 14:43 <cpaelzer> I also see slyon now left some comments 14:43 <cpaelzer> I'll consuem all of that and maybe we can then get more review and mereg it next week? 14:43 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:43 <slyon> yep. +1 (modulo some nitpicks) 14:43 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:43 <cpaelzer> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:43 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0 14:44 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0 14:44 <cpaelzer> Internal link 14:44 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 14:44 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:44 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:44 <cpaelzer> this should be almost as clean as the other queues 14:44 <cpaelzer> I see rust-hwlib as assigned - which we had the dsicussion on outdated vendored things 14:44 <cpaelzer> no update since IIRC 14:44 <cpaelzer> eve4rything else - under control 14:44 <slyon> pushkarnk finished https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pdfio/+bug/2103648 today, which needs a security review tag. @sarnold 14:44 <cpaelzer> wow - when did I say that the last time for your queue slyon 14:44 <cpaelzer> praise-party 14:45 <slyon> hehe 14:45 <cpaelzer> and here we go, refilling the queue 14:45 <cpaelzer> is that a panic 25.10 asap case 14:45 <cpaelzer> sorry 25.04 14:45 <cpaelzer> or semi-relaxed 25.10 14:45 <cpaelzer> we discussed it here so I should remember, but I do not :-/ 14:45 <slyon> yeah. pdfio is 25.10 14:45 <cpaelzer> ah ok, safe then 14:45 <cpaelzer> sarnold: tag it! 14:45 <sarnold> slyon: thanks 14:46 <slyon> well, thanks to pushkarnk :) I only did the double-checking :) 14:46 <cpaelzer> also thanks pushkarnk and slyon for doing joint reviews to get pushkarnk fully trained up 14:46 <cpaelzer> appreciated 14:46 <pushkarnk> thanks for the great review slyon :) 14:46 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business? 14:46 <sarnold> none here 14:46 <cpaelzer> wow, all this good feeling. Almost empty queues, reviews done, ... how can we destroy it now? 14:46 <cpaelzer> none here either 14:46 <joalif> nothing here 14:46 <sarnold> https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/SEC-6094 pdfio 14:46 <slyon> nothing 14:46 <cpaelzer> thanks slyon 14:46 <slyon> thx sarnold ! 14:46 <pushkarnk> nothing 14:46 <mylesjp> nothing from me 14:47 <slyon> \o/ 14:47 <cpaelzer> the thanks s<tab> was meant to be for sarnold 14:47 <cpaelzer> hey mylesjp and thanks 14:47 <cpaelzer> you are busy with the moving openstack anyway I assume 14:47 <cpaelzer> but in the long run you'll have james job of handling the python-whatever deps of OS 14:48 <cpaelzer> in case you didn't pick it up ealier - mylesjp is the sucessor of jamespage as representative for the openstack team 14:48 <sarnold> so much churn 14:48 <sarnold> such big shoes :) 14:48 <cpaelzer> I wonder, do we ahve anyone in AMERICAS to guide him initially as slyon does for pushkarnk? 14:48 <cpaelzer> sarnold: is there but the security side of the process 14:49 <mylesjp> I'm out in Vancouver so time zones are a little tricky 14:49 <cpaelzer> didrocks: joalif: myself ... all EMEA 14:49 <sarnold> hooray cascadia crew! 14:49 <mylesjp> \o/ 14:49 <cpaelzer> well, let us bet on the person reading this later ... 14:49 <cpaelzer> didrocks: if you feel you could towards the latter part of your day help train someone else to do the MIR review work, reach out to mylesjp 14:50 <cpaelzer> TBH that is it for AOB is it? 14:50 <sarnold> we're tired, boss 14:50 <cpaelzer> then get out and fix and relax 14:50 <sarnold> :D 14:50 <cpaelzer> let me fetch you some coutndown numbers 14:50 <mylesjp> I've done quite a few MIRs myself but never reviewed someone elses. I could definitely sit in on one. 14:51 <cpaelzer> yep, that is how we all started 14:51 <cpaelzer> as slyon and pushkarnk do 14:51 <cpaelzer> you'd prep but get double checked for a while 14:51 <cpaelzer> then you get the spiderman stare at the spring about great power and great responsibility 14:51 <slyon> mylesjp: could even be async, I guess. Pushkar usually prepares MIR reviews in GDoc, I add my comments before publishing to LP 14:51 <cpaelzer> and then we'd add you to the LP group and you'd be another eligible to do reviews 14:51 <mylesjp> sounds great 14:52 <cpaelzer> ok, look what I found in urandom for ou 14:52 <cpaelzer> 5 14:52 <cpaelzer> 4 14:52 <cpaelzer> 2 14:52 <cpaelzer> 7 14:52 <cpaelzer> 0 14:52 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting