15:40 <sarnold> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
15:40 <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:40:12 UTC.  The chair is sarnold.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
15:40 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
15:40 <sarnold> #topic current component mismatches
15:40 <sarnold> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
15:40 <sarnold> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
15:40 <sarnold> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
15:41 <sarnold> libsass in progress .. linux-realtime, presumably apw will do whatever apw does with kernsl eventually
15:42 <sarnold> ruby-rackup is on pcs, that feels server-ish .. presumably jchittum and team will decide what to do with that .. and ruby-rack
15:42 <sarnold> nlohmann-json3 is in progress, esmtp and xterm are known things, right?
15:43 <sarnold> #topic New MIRs
15:43 <sarnold> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
15:43 <sarnold> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
15:44 <jbicha> xterm is false positive
15:44 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-mathjax-full/+bug/2101889 filed by tsimonq2  -- hey simon :) btw we moved to a single package per MIR bug to simplify our internal JIRA tooling :(
15:45 <sarnold> my memory is not perfect on this point -- do we care about sphinx as a first-class object? or do we only have it around because historically it's always been around?
15:46 <sarnold> I think I would have expected sphinx to really only be in main because it's in build dependencies, and we decided a few years ago to exempt "documentation generation" things from the "must be in main" requirement. (No, I don't know how we would implement this.)
15:46 <sarnold> and if these packages are being proposed for promotion as part of "building documentation", then maybe we skip them entirely? does that sound familiar?
15:47 <sarnold> I suspect we won't get a concrete answer here, so I'll just add comments like this to the bug after the meeting
15:47 <sarnold> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
15:47 <sarnold> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
15:47 <sarnold> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
15:47 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-sequoia-sqv/+bug/2089690
15:48 <sarnold> not ready yet
15:48 <jbicha> it might be as simple as removing the Extra-Include: *-doc
15:48 <jbicha> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/tree/supported#n112
15:48 <sarnold> jbicha: aha! that looks very promising, yes :)
15:48 <sarnold> thanks
15:48 <jbicha> but that would be a lot of work for the AAs I think to move things around
15:49 <sarnold> that is the life of privation and trial they have accepted
15:49 <jbicha> add a Github issue to discuss the idea?
15:49 <sarnold> good idea
15:49 <sarnold> do you want to do it? :)
15:49 <jbicha> no, sorry
15:49 <sarnold> ack
15:49 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsass-python/+bug/2095581
15:50 <sarnold> this is likely waiting on the security team libsass review. nico had basically finished that before he left, I'm not sure if we finished the paperwork though :(
15:50 <sarnold> I'll track that down.
15:50 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-gst-plugin-gtk4/+bug/2097804
15:51 <sarnold> looks like it has some TODOs, moving on
15:51 <sarnold> then we get to dbus-broker and older .. I propose we skip those for later
15:51 <sarnold> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
15:51 <sarnold> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
15:51 <sarnold> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
15:51 <sarnold> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
15:52 <sarnold> https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/79 is open for review and discussion, so, please review and discuss
15:52 <sarnold> nothing new in issues
15:52 <sarnold> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
15:52 <sarnold> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
15:52 <sarnold> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.
15:52 <sarnold> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
15:52 <sarnold> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
15:52 <sarnold> Internal link
15:52 <sarnold> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
15:52 <sarnold> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
15:52 <sarnold> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
15:53 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nlohmann-json3/+bug/2093868
15:53 <sarnold> I believe this has been assigned, unsure of the progress, I've been remarkably unavailable the last week :/
15:53 <ebarretto> yes, it is assigned and we are looking into delivering the audit by end of this week
15:53 <sarnold> hmm, why doesn't that query sort by "last updated"? seems like something to fix
15:54 <sarnold> ebarretto: oh awesome, thanks
15:54 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/plucky/+bug/2072561
15:54 <ebarretto> Rodrigo is taking a look on that one and also targeting end of this week
15:55 <sarnold> lovely lovely, you're quicker than I am ;)
15:55 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libva/+bug/2097800
15:55 <ebarretto> that one is with Giampaolo iirc
15:55 <sarnold> I see giampaolo on that one, nice nice
15:56 <sarnold> I should have a conversation with sudhakar about jpeg-xl https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2070882 -- I think they were slow to look at his pull request that fixes a bunch of tests
15:56 <sarnold> that's not exactly encouraging
15:56 <sarnold> but maybe the code is otherwise still okay?
15:57 <jbicha> once I pinged them on Discord, the review happened quickly 🤷
15:57 <sarnold> oh sweet, thanks jbicha ;)
15:58 <ebarretto> sarnold: the one that was with Nico, did we get to publish?
15:58 <sarnold> ebarretto: I haven't checked yet :/
15:59 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsass/+bug/2095582
15:59 <sarnold> <3 nico
15:59 <sarnold> he attached it rather than pasting it in, but it's there :D
15:59 <ebarretto> \o/
16:00 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto3/+bug/2061217
16:00 <sarnold> the last comment is promotion. I don't recall why this is on our list but I bet it'd be easy to get it off the list. heh.
16:00 <sarnold> so
16:01 <sarnold> #topic Any other business?
16:01 <mylesjp> All good on my end
16:01 <didrocks> nothing for me (just back, will backlog)
16:01 <pushkarnk> Nothing from me
16:01 <sarnold> alright then :)
16:02 <sarnold> nothing here, either
16:02 <sarnold> #endmeeting