== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by juliank, 23 Jan at 16:02 — 16:56 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2025/ubuntu-meeting.2025-01-23-16.02.log.html == Meeting summary == === Lightning rounds === Discussion started by juliank at 16:02. * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-2025-01-23/53816 (juliank, 16:03) === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by juliank at 16:11. * ''LINK:'' http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-pp-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 16:11) * ''LINK:'' http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-nn-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 16:18) === Team proposed-migration report === Discussion started by juliank at 16:36. * ''LINK:'' https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 16:37) === AOB === Discussion started by juliank at 16:49. == People present (lines said) == * juliank (55) * schopin (19) * enr0n (5) * bdrung (4) * waveform (4) * meetingology (2) * rkratky (2) * dviererbe (1) * levihackerman (1) * uralt (1) * zhsj (1) == Full log == 16:02 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 16:02 Meeting started at 16:02:44 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 16:02 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 16:02 #topic Lightning rounds 16:02 o/ 16:02 juliank, always blame windows! 16:03 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-2025-01-23/53816 16:03 o/ 16:04 o/ 16:09 waveform: you mention the rpi-eeprom package, right now you're waiting on SRU review on the .2, correct? 16:09 correct 16:10 schopin, oh erm, SRU or AA? Is the AA ack done? 16:10 It's new binaries, it needs to get through Unapproved before it gets to NEW (because we need it to build ;) ) 16:11 #topic Release incoming bugs 16:11 #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-pp-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:13 bug 2006981 16:14 schopin posted a possible check that apport can do before trying to launch windows 16:15 so we could take this ticket 16:15 I think the Desktop team would like this, because otherwise they don't get crash reports for gnome-shell. 16:16 Or maybe they do, just belated? 16:16 taken 16:16 👍 16:16 Assigned to bdrung for now 16:16 bug 2093081 16:17 enr0n: yo 16:17 juliank, why not gifting it to schopin? 16:17 ah yes 16:17 bdrung: you can gift it to him it's your component :D 16:17 bdrung: who are we kidding, we'll most likely work on it during our pairing session anyway... 16:17 haha 16:18 we'll get back to nginx systemd thing next week 16:18 oo is empty 16:18 #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-nn-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:18 bug 1888347 is still incomplete 16:19 seems to be true 16:19 also me commenting it delayed the closure lol 16:19 bug 2088268 16:23 still waiting on input from Security 16:23 bug 2092501 16:23 Sorry I already moved ahead a bit internally 16:23 :D 16:24 I figured ;) 16:25 OK so this isn't resolved upstream yet 16:25 The tag feels a bit premature 16:25 agreed. 16:26 untag with a note to tag it back once it's actionable? 16:26 I'll tag it rls-qq-incoming and then we will check it in May at the latest 16:26 that works too :P 16:27 bug 2041518 is with desktop 16:27 Actually that sounds a lot like the one I tagged. 16:27 Oh yes it does 16:28 there are two cases of the bug 16:28 So while it's still be nice for the G* stack to surface proper exceptions, we might finally be rid of this particular bug. 16:28 (1) the windows already is open and we are crashing 16:28 (2) we are trying to open the window after the connection is shut down 16:29 I guess we can keep this one for (1) 16:29 bug 2092463 16:30 very weird 16:30 I guess we can tag that enr0n 16:31 hm, let me look 16:31 you tagged it incoming :D 16:31 ugh, I can't keep track of u-r-u bugs 16:32 enr0n: so tag it is? 16:32 I don't have much more insight to give either as I never saw it before :D 16:32 This needs investigating I guess, they might have some weird sources. 16:33 They have *so many* sources. My first guess was it's another python-apt issue (like the ones that don't like [foo=bar], or weird things about comments) 16:33 so invalid means the sources.list rewriter failed 16:34 My money is on the [arch=i386,amd64] thing 16:34 arch should be fine 16:34 yeah, that seems like a good bet 16:35 It's still frustrating people put arch in there in teh first place 16:35 (the proper way to is to list all architectures in Architectures:; then apt will not warn if you repository doesn ot have packages for an arch) 16:36 But yeah this needs investigating but the fix should be obvious from that 16:36 It's not like this is some wild goosechase 16:36 Let's tag and move on 16:36 #topic Team proposed-migration report 16:37 (yes jj ff were empty) 16:37 #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 16:40 python vs nova should be done 16:42 pyudev's still with me 16:42 Is anything on that migration unassigned? 16:42 (it needs a whole new version uploaded to fix) 16:44 python3-defaults vs ansible-core/2.18.1-4: rkratky 16:45 ack 16:46 rkratky so it turns out this was assigned mateus-morais but I don't see it :D 16:47 python3-defaults rest: ginggs 16:47 xxhash rkratky 16:48 ok :) 16:48 libpng1.6 vs gtk4: uralt 16:48 could you assign libgit2 to me? 16:49 ack 16:49 libxs-parse-keyword-perl: liushuyu 16:49 #topic AOB 16:50 i will be off for next two weeks 16:56 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)