15:30 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 15:30 Meeting started at 15:30:58 UTC. The chair is slyon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:31 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:31 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( dviererbe ) 15:31 #topic current component mismatches 15:31 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 15:31 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 15:31 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 15:31 o/ 15:32 o/ 15:32 non-proposed looking clean 15:33 my team has been processing a milestone for the openstack release last and this week which has generated a few mismatches (and will generate some more - I'm aware of a switch to libsass for Scss processing in Horizon) 15:33 wow, 2013-05-09 .. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-json/+bug/1178274 15:33 jpeg-xl is pending security, jemalloc making good progress but there are some comments from eslerm for joalif to check 15:34 wtmpdb is with the server team (I will talk with the team about that, but we already discussed it previously) 15:35 thanks jamespage for the python-observabilityclient stub https://launchpad.net/bugs/2095359 15:35 I'll get one of my team to fill that in (along with any others that appear) 15:35 flexparser pending security review 15:35 thx! 15:35 I'm actively reviewing raspi-utils for foundations. It's a bit complex.. 15:36 that leaves us with new mismatches for ruby3.3, pcs and ruby-sinatra, all owned by the server team. I'll take an action item to discuss those with the team 15:37 as sarnold mentioned to old/previous MIRs are probably not good enough by today's standards 15:37 #topic New MIRs 15:37 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 15:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:37 joalif: do you have capacity to take https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin/+bug/2093182 ? 15:38 yes 15:38 (I'll be off next week, so rather not take a review in addition to the mismatches) 15:38 ok, let me assign it to you. Thx! 15:38 that's all for new MIRs 15:38 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 15:38 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 15:39 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:39 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nlohmann-json3/+bug/2093868 didrocks reviewed. Back to incomplete due to questions/action items for the reporter 15:39 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-observabilityclient/+bug/2095359 this is the openstack stub we mentioned earlier 15:40 still TODO 15:40 and just a tracking update about sequoia, which is unrelated to MIR 15:41 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpisp/+bug/2093321 15:42 this needs sponsorship 15:43 So "Incomplete" is still correct. I left a comment. 15:43 #topic Process/Documentation improvements 15:43 Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 15:43 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 15:43 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 15:44 I started a new draft about "rust cargo vendor-filterer", https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/76 which seems to be a nice tool for filtering vendored Rust dependencies (cc didrocks) 15:44 Thanks juliank for packaging it. He also wanted to improve the MIR/vendoring documentation around it further, so we can ignore this draft for now. 15:45 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 15:45 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 15:45 Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 15:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:45 :D 15:45 #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 15:45 sarnold: how is the security-review backlog looking? 15:45 unfortunately I don't believe anything has been picked up recently :/ we're all feeling pretty squeezed due to turnover :( 15:47 :( Please poke management about this capacity bottleneck. The Plucky FeatureFreeze (Feb 20) is the looming deadline for many of the pending reviews, and it's only 4 weeks away. 15:47 #topic Any other business? 15:48 we added erlang-doc to Extra-Exclude to get it off component mismatches. Could an AA demote it so that erlang in plucky-proposed can migrate? bug 2094814 15:48 o/ 15:48 The erlang component missmatch from last week is still listed on the proposed-migration page https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/erlang/+bug/2094814 ; Can an AA do the demotion of demote erlang-doc? 15:48 ☺️ 15:48 ha :) 15:48 can we also look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2054480 15:49 No AA here today, unfortunately. Maybe didrocks can help with erlang-doc demotion when he reads the log later? ^ Otherwise, you you please ping ubuntu-archive in #ubuntu-release instead? 15:49 r41k0u: awesome, thanks, I'll give the new merge request a look later today :) 15:49 thanks a lot!! 15:50 jbicha, slyon, I can do that demotion 15:50 r41k0u: the part about the different permissions in prodstack sure feels weird, though. 15:50 seb128: may I, 15:50 thx 15:50 ? 15:50 thanks seb128! 15:50 schopin, please do 15:50 and schopin! 15:50 hah, and here I thought an aa might be hard to find this week :) 15:50 :D 15:50 and thanks sarnold for handling r41k0u's request! 15:50 Do we have anything else? 15:51 yep 15:51 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nlohmann-json3/+bug/2093868/comments/10, is it recommended to move some autopkgtest to run during build to fulfil the requirement? 15:52 or allowed (instead of recommended) 15:53 r41k0u: yes, that's a reasonable approach. It shouldn't be moved, though. But copied. We want to run it at build time (dh_auto_test) and as an autopkgtest of the installed packages 15:53 right, thanks! 15:53 ah slyon said it better than what I was writing :) 15:53 If you can extract some autopkgtests to also run at build-time, that'd be great. Please do so and ping on the bug report once it's ready. 15:54 ack 15:54 Any other topic? 15:54 none here 15:54 nothing here 15:55 So now I need to come up with a fancy "countdown" sequence? :P 15:55 8 15:55 5 15:55 3 15:55 2 15:55 1 15:55 1 15:55 0 15:55 Thanks all! 15:55 #endmeeting