16:02 <juliank> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
16:02 <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:02:22 UTC.  The chair is juliank.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
16:02 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
16:02 <juliank> #topic Lightning rounds
16:02 <juliank> We skip today
16:03 <juliank> #topic Release incoming bugs
16:03 <ravikant_> o/
16:03 <juliank> #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-pp-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:03 <liushuyu> o/
16:03 <juliank> bug 2083942
16:03 <adrien> \o (half around only)
16:03 <uralt> o/
16:03 <mkukri> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2086104
16:04 <juliank> we are still talking about bug 2083942
16:04 <juliank> :D
16:04 <ravikant_> should we tag it todo?
16:04 <juliank> enr0n: I think we should tag this todo
16:05 <juliank> bug 2085070 seems for schopin
16:05 <schopin> Well, anyone who wants to do an SRU can take it too :)
16:06 <enr0n> schopin: yes ^
16:06 <enr0n> who needs/wants to do an SRU?
16:06 <schopin> But yes clearly it needs to be tagged.
16:06 <juliank> schopin: Well yes I just want you to drive and judge whether that's correct
16:07 <juliank> We do not ship a glusterd
16:07 <ravikant_> andersson123 wants to do an STU
16:07 <schopin> We don't? Oh well :P
16:07 <ravikant_> SRU*
16:07 <juliank> Ah ok glusterfs-server
16:07 <r41k0u> enr0n I can take this up
16:07 <juliank> apt search didn't pop anything up
16:08 <andersson123> I can take one at another time  since Mate is volunteering :)
16:08 <schopin> r41k0u spoke first (and in the correct place too)
16:08 <juliank> Well ok then
16:09 <juliank> bug 2085142
16:09 <juliank> this isn't anything we can do I suppose
16:10 <juliank> We can file a ticket with IS
16:12 <juliank> I have filed a ticket with IS
16:12 <schopin> Any volunteer to drive this?
16:12 <juliank> If IS tells me it's not their task I can circle back
16:13 <schopin> I guess Julian volunteered then :)
16:13 <juliank> I'll keep it as incoming for a week
16:13 <juliank> To force me to check next week
16:13 <juliank> bug 2015538
16:13 <slyon> That one again..
16:13 <juliank> Should we move this to qq now
16:13 <slyon> we still need somebody to do the upstream gdm work
16:14 <slyon> as long as that work doesn't get done, we can't move forward
16:14 <slyon> maybe we should drop the tag until somebody (some team) picks up that work?
16:15 <juliank> Just pushing it forward each cycle for consideration seems sensible to me
16:15 <schopin> I fear that if we do nothing will ever happen.
16:15 <schopin> (do drop the tag I mean)
16:21 <juliank> liushuyu: the implementation is at https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/pull/321/files
16:21 <juliank> #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-oo-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:22 <juliank> bug 2085157
16:22 <bdrung> I already started working on it. So please tag it.
16:23 <juliank> tagged
16:23 <juliank> bug 2085548
16:26 <liushuyu> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/2083131
16:26 <juliank> I left a comment on the first bug
16:27 <juliank> And I'll tag the second one as todo I guess
16:28 <juliank> #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-nn-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:28 <juliank> bug 2041518
16:28 <juliank> that one was with desktop
16:29 <juliank> bug 2085314
16:29 <juliank> enr0n:
16:29 <enr0n> looking
16:29 <juliank> There's a fix upstream to cherry pick
16:30 <juliank> Reproducer for SRU may be tricky
16:30 <schopin> maybe valgrind would pick up the overflow?
16:31 <juliank> Either way we can upload it and convince SRU team that we can't reproduce it but upstream says it fixes it or something?
16:31 <enr0n> it looks like there is a somewhat reliable repro on the bug report. I will give it a shot and tag this for SRU if so
16:31 <enr0n> something something micro release exceptions for systemd
16:32 <juliank> heh
16:32 <juliank> bug 2060676
16:32 <schopin> does systemd *do* microreleases?
16:32 <juliank> yes
16:32 <slyon> yes
16:32 <enr0n> schopin: yes
16:32 <juliank> lol3
16:32 <juliank> This sounds like a won't fix?
16:33 <juliank> Oh well Debian has a fix
16:33 <juliank> Last time I looked at it I couldn't figure out where it came from
16:33 <juliank> let's do it I guess, this is weird auditing
16:34 <juliank> bug 2078596
16:34 <juliank> This is about broken command-not-found data
16:35 <juliank> We have no straightforward way to fix it as the release pocket is frozen
16:35 <schopin> re the shadow bug, it's fairly low priority, I'm not sure we'd want to risk an SRU just for this?
16:35 <juliank> schopin: I'd rather fix it now before it comes back in from very annoyed customers via support
16:36 <schopin> heh, at least they'd feel they get their money's worth?
16:36 <juliank> These get to security-relevant logs and can flare up auditing things
16:38 <andersson123> I can take !
16:39 <andersson123> I volunteer ... Katniss style
16:39 <juliank> andersson123: the command-not-found issue or the shadow thing?
16:39 <andersson123> whichever is simplest :)
16:39 * schopin imagines andersson123 with a long braid.
16:40 <juliank> command-not-found requires inventing a new mechanism in command-not-found to have fixups
16:40 <juliank> and infrastructure changes
16:40 <schopin> andersson123: shadow is simpler.
16:40 <andersson123> Shadow then please (my fav hedgehog)
16:41 <schopin> Yay delegation \o/
16:42 <ravikant_> is this related? 2066199
16:42 <ravikant_> bug 2066199
16:42 <juliank> This would fix that one instance for sure
16:42 <juliank> But I think it's worth fixing the general case
16:43 <juliank> We need to do a one-off hack to command-not-found in to ignore everything not actually published in noble
16:43 <juliank> as we can't fix the noble data
16:46 <juliank> bug 2078579
16:48 <juliank> #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:48 <juliank> sorry I missed bug 2086506
16:52 <juliank> I'll go look at my discussions about this a couple months ago and then I'll come back to this next week
16:53 <juliank> bug 2085951
16:53 <juliank> update-notifier seems to miss a Depends: python3-debian
16:53 <juliank> in jammy and below
16:54 <juliank> #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:54 <juliank> empty
16:54 <juliank> #topic Team proposed-migration report
16:54 <juliank> #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
16:55 <juliank> ginggs said this is too much in flux and we should do it next week after everything got retried
16:55 <juliank> We are also running out of time anyway
16:55 <juliank> #topic AOB
16:55 <enr0n> if we are going to tag 2085951, should we also add an assignee?
16:55 <enr0n> otherwise it's gonna get lost in the ether
16:55 <ravikant_> juliank: can you triage this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzstd/+bug/2086543
16:55 <juliank> Ah yes, who wants to add a dependency?
16:56 <juliank> mkukri wanted to do an SRU I think?
16:57 <mkukri> took it
16:59 <juliank> ravikant_: I think static libraries are not supposed to be built with fPIC so this is correct?
16:59 <juliank> But it's a tool chain question
16:59 <mkukri> at least -fPIE maybe? or otherwise you cannot link them into pies
17:07 <juliank> #endmeeting