== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by cpaelzer, 15 Oct at 14:32 — 15:01 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-10-15-14.32.log.html == Meeting summary == === current component mismatches === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:35. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (cpaelzer, 14:35) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (cpaelzer, 14:35) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:41. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:41) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:42. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:42) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+bug/2071717 got some action but still waiting for more tasks to be completed (cpaelzer, 14:44) === Process/Documentation improvements === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:45. * ''LINK:'' https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls (cpaelzer, 14:45) * ''LINK:'' https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues (cpaelzer, 14:45) === MIR related Security Review Queue === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:46. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:46) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:46) * ''LINK:'' https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 (cpaelzer, 14:47) === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:54. == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (76) * sarnold (21) * slyon (7) * meetingology (2) * joalif (1) * ebarretto (1) == Full log == 14:32 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:32 Meeting started at 14:32:39 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:32 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:32 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:32 sarnold: and me are around 14:32 o/ 14:33 please chime in now to see if we have a reasonable consensus 14:35 ok, three then 14:35 let us assume we check the queues but not expect much decisions 14:35 #topic current component mismatches 14:35 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:35 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:35 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:35 ooo fancy 14:37 kernel in there for realtime which they usually handle themselve 14:38 we have no representative of them here 14:38 let me raise it in the kernel channel to be sure 14:38 there's scores of supported kernels, i'm surprised this doesn't come up more often 14:41 I assume this is due to realtime formerly being a thing of its own 14:41 but now all in the kernel, so they likely changed from a binary to a meta package or such 14:41 and that could be new, and thereby start in universe 14:41 #topic New MIRs 14:41 I think it's brand new :) 14:41 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:41 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:41 which matches my thougth 14:41 empty queue here - good 14:42 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:42 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:42 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:44 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+bug/2071717 got some action but still waiting for more tasks to be completed 14:45 didrocks: commented on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/+bug/2058192 14:45 seems not yet complete 14:45 no action need to be taken now 14:45 #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:45 Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:45 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:45 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:46 no new entries 14:46 last update was on https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/69 14:46 where slyon gladly carried our discussion that -dev exclusion should still be a per-case thing 14:46 no action either AFAICS 14:46 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:46 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:46 Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:47 Internal link 14:47 - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 14:47 - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:47 #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:48 sarnold: should https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openscap/+bug/1877696 get off of that list 14:48 it is from & to security 14:48 and oval / openscap no more seems to be the future 14:48 is it time to eliminate it from the board and reject the launchpad case? 14:48 cpaelzer: heh, I think oval was given a last-second reprieve, I believe the US Navy something or other is taking it over 14:48 oh is it 14:48 I'm curious to learn about that - any link? 14:49 no action for now 14:49 excellent question :) I think ebarretto is the one to ask, he may know if it's got an announcement anywhere or not 14:49 my request for a link is just me being curious 14:49 Thanks ebarretto just reply here if you have anything to share in that regard 14:50 it does feel weird to not have this package in main given that we use it :/ 14:51 jorge said he was going to ask the fraunhofer folks about his findings in the fdk-aac-free package, but given that the package is a derivative of a derivative I'm not sure if they'll care 14:51 wow 14:52 I'm uneasy about it. 14:52 about it having no clear owner? 14:52 on the one hand the feature (forwarding audio from remote hosts when doing gnome-remote-desktop things) seems like a very nice feature 14:52 but on the other hand, it sure feels like there's zero responsible upstream 14:52 and codecs .. miserable things. 14:54 probably no progress on the other mirs :( 14:54 yeah 14:54 sorry, i got stuck reading into the case 14:54 .. and unlikely to see any, for a few weeks 14:54 but it is licensing - never a quick topic 14:54 heh, that can happen :) 14:54 you are right to go on 14:54 #topic Any other business? 14:54 nothing from me 14:54 see you in the hague :) 14:54 oh, actually, next week's meeting .. 14:54 \o/ 14:55 i propose we cancel it 14:56 yeah, there is no way to attend while at sprints 14:57 I'll cancel the calendar invite ... 14:57 o/ 14:57 * ebarretto reading 14:57 do we still have time? 14:57 I wanted to ask about the Sprint MIR sync 14:58 it was a MIR sync + office-hours initial. I see its been downgraded to just a "sync" (MIR internal) 14:58 was that intentional, cpaelzer ? 14:58 Samir from the Foundations Toolchain squad asked me if we could have MIR office-hours at the sprint, specifically. And was happy to hear that we have something planned. 14:59 slyon: yes it was intentional as it collided with a plenary while it was at full size 14:59 ow 14:59 is it near to the plenary at the start or the end of the day? 14:59 If you sak me - we can welcome guests, but it will eat from the time we have for ourselves 15:00 if start .. those things almost always run long 15:00 no, there is a plenary after lunch 15:00 which no one expected when planning things early on 15:00 bonus :-) 15:00 *middle* of the day? weird 15:00 which made me shorten our invite 15:00 slyon: tell samir to come by still 15:00 okay. Let's see how it goes than. We can invite guests and otherwise I might run a team-local Foundations/MIR office hours session afterwards 15:00 but let us not do global office hours, but request based - so we know what to expect 15:01 ack 15:01 closing ... 15:01 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)