14:32 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:32 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:32:39 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:32 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:32 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )
14:32 <cpaelzer> sarnold:  and me are around
14:32 <joalif> o/
14:33 <cpaelzer> please chime in now to see if we have a reasonable consensus
14:35 <cpaelzer> ok, three then
14:35 <cpaelzer> let us assume we check the queues but not expect much decisions
14:35 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
14:35 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:35 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:35 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:35 <sarnold> ooo fancy
14:37 <cpaelzer> kernel in there for realtime which they usually handle themselve
14:38 <cpaelzer> we have no representative of them here
14:38 <cpaelzer> let me raise it in the kernel channel to be sure
14:38 <sarnold> there's scores of supported kernels, i'm surprised this doesn't come up more often
14:41 <cpaelzer> I assume this is due to realtime formerly being a thing of its own
14:41 <cpaelzer> but now all in the kernel, so they likely changed from a binary to a meta package or such
14:41 <cpaelzer> and that could be new, and thereby start in universe
14:41 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
14:41 <sarnold> I think it's brand new :)
14:41 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
14:41 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:41 <cpaelzer> which matches my thougth
14:41 <cpaelzer> empty queue here - good
14:42 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
14:42 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:44 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+bug/2071717 got some action but still waiting for more tasks to be completed
14:45 <cpaelzer> didrocks: commented on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/+bug/2058192
14:45 <cpaelzer> seems not yet complete
14:45 <cpaelzer> no action need to be taken now
14:45 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
14:45 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
14:45 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
14:45 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
14:46 <cpaelzer> no new entries
14:46 <cpaelzer> last update was on https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/69
14:46 <cpaelzer> where slyon gladly carried our discussion that -dev exclusion should still be a per-case thing
14:46 <cpaelzer> no action either AFAICS
14:46 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
14:46 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
14:46 <cpaelzer> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.
14:46 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:46 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:47 <cpaelzer> Internal link
14:47 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
14:47 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
14:47 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
14:48 <cpaelzer> sarnold: should https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openscap/+bug/1877696 get off of that list
14:48 <cpaelzer> it is from & to security
14:48 <cpaelzer> and oval / openscap no more seems to be the future
14:48 <cpaelzer> is it time to eliminate it from the board and reject the launchpad case?
14:48 <sarnold> cpaelzer: heh, I think oval was given a last-second reprieve, I believe the US Navy something or other is taking it over
14:48 <cpaelzer> oh is it
14:48 <cpaelzer> I'm curious to learn about that - any link?
14:49 <cpaelzer> no action for now
14:49 <sarnold> excellent question :) I think ebarretto is the one to ask, he may know if it's got an announcement anywhere or not
14:49 <cpaelzer> my request for a link is just me being curious
14:49 <cpaelzer> Thanks ebarretto just reply here if you have anything to share in that regard
14:50 <sarnold> it does feel weird to not have this package in main given that we use it :/
14:51 <sarnold> jorge said he was going to ask the fraunhofer folks about his findings in the fdk-aac-free package, but given that the package is a derivative of a derivative I'm not sure if they'll care
14:51 <cpaelzer> wow
14:52 <sarnold> I'm uneasy about it.
14:52 <cpaelzer> about it having no clear owner?
14:52 <sarnold> on the one hand the feature (forwarding audio from remote hosts when doing gnome-remote-desktop things) seems like a very nice feature
14:52 <sarnold> but on the other hand, it sure feels like there's zero responsible upstream
14:52 <sarnold> and codecs .. miserable things.
14:54 <sarnold> probably no progress on the other mirs :(
14:54 <cpaelzer> yeah
14:54 <cpaelzer> sorry, i got stuck reading into the case
14:54 <sarnold> .. and unlikely to see any, for a few weeks
14:54 <cpaelzer> but it is licensing - never a quick topic
14:54 <sarnold> heh, that can happen :)
14:54 <cpaelzer> you are right to go on
14:54 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
14:54 <cpaelzer> nothing from me
14:54 <sarnold> see you in the hague :)
14:54 <sarnold> oh, actually, next week's meeting ..
14:54 <cpaelzer> \o/
14:55 <sarnold> i propose we cancel it
14:56 <cpaelzer> yeah, there is no way to attend while at sprints
14:57 <cpaelzer> I'll cancel the calendar invite ...
14:57 <slyon> o/
14:57 * ebarretto reading 
14:57 <slyon> do we still have time?
14:57 <slyon> I wanted to ask about the Sprint MIR sync
14:58 <slyon> it was a MIR sync + office-hours initial. I see its been downgraded to just a "sync" (MIR internal)
14:58 <slyon> was that intentional, cpaelzer ?
14:58 <slyon> Samir from the Foundations Toolchain squad asked me if we could have MIR office-hours at the sprint, specifically. And was happy to hear that we have something planned.
14:59 <cpaelzer> slyon: yes it was intentional as it collided with a plenary while it was at full size
14:59 <sarnold> ow
14:59 <sarnold> is it near to the plenary at the start or the end of the day?
14:59 <cpaelzer> If you sak me - we can welcome guests, but it will eat from the time we have for ourselves
15:00 <sarnold> if start .. those things almost always run long
15:00 <cpaelzer> no, there is a plenary after lunch
15:00 <cpaelzer> which no one expected when planning things early on
15:00 <cpaelzer> bonus :-)
15:00 <sarnold> *middle* of the day? weird
15:00 <cpaelzer> which made me shorten our invite
15:00 <cpaelzer> slyon: tell samir to come by still
15:00 <slyon> okay. Let's see how it goes than. We can invite guests and otherwise I might run a team-local Foundations/MIR office hours session afterwards
15:00 <cpaelzer> but let us not do global office hours, but request based - so we know what to expect
15:01 <cpaelzer> ack
15:01 <cpaelzer> closing ...
15:01 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting