14:33 <slyon> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:33 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:33:27 UTC. The chair is slyon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:33 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:33 <slyon> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:33 <slyon> #topic current component mismatches 14:33 <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:33 <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:33 <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:34 <slyon> looks much cleaner! and all known. with bug #2072621 blocked on security review. 14:34 <slyon> #topic New MIRs 14:34 <slyon> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:34 <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:35 <slyon> bug #2069308 14:35 <slyon> this looks mostly ready, but MIR requirement #1 should be looked at (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/comments/4) CC jbicha nteodosio 14:35 <sarnold> nice to have a comment from vladirmir 14:36 <slyon> indeed! 14:36 <slyon> bug #2070025 14:36 <jbicha> the component-mismatches reported haven't updated in almost a week 14:37 <sarnold> uhoh 14:37 <slyon> uh oh.. so we might be up for some surprise 14:38 <slyon> wsdd got security ACK, but cpaelzer had a bunch of MIR requirements, that I'm not clear if they got resolved. Maybe he can check and comment on that after the meeting 14:38 <jbicha> I can handle 1 and 2 for xdg-terminal-exec. We won't be promoting it to main for oracular though 14:39 <slyon> thanks! 14:39 <nteodosio> jbicha, there is https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/xdg-terminal-exec/-/merge_requests/1. 14:40 <slyon> bug #2080965 14:40 <jbicha> oops I wasn't subscribed to merge request notifications at that time 14:40 <slyon> I guess I can take architecture-properties 14:41 <slyon> bug #2080062 14:41 <slyon> joalif: Could you take that for MIR review? ^ 14:43 <slyon> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:43 <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:43 <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:43 <slyon> nothing new in the list 14:43 <slyon> #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:43 <slyon> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:43 <slyon> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:43 <slyon> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:44 <slyon> https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/67 14:44 <slyon> thanks for reporting this sarnold! I could not reproduce on my end, but pinged dviererbe about it. I don't think it's super urgent. 14:45 <slyon> https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/66 14:46 <slyon> Thanks for all your input on this so far. I integrated most of it today. 14:46 <slyon> sarnold: I left a comment for you here https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/66#discussion_r1763003517 14:47 <sarnold> ah thanks 14:47 <slyon> I really like the <name>.orig-vendor.tar.xz approach suggested by the foundations/toolchain people and used by s390-tools. I'll double-check that and try to update the docs accordingly by next week. 14:47 <slyon> So I'll keep this a pending for now 14:47 <slyon> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:48 <slyon> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:48 <slyon> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:48 <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:48 <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:48 <slyon> Internal link 14:48 <slyon> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:48 <slyon> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:48 <sarnold> there's some progress lately :) and some packages are in progress <3 14:49 <slyon> sarnold: we've seen a bunch of finished security reviews this week. Is velocity picking up? 14:49 <sarnold> yes, thankfully :) we still have large deadlines with other projects so it may not represent a new consistency but it's an improvement at the moment 14:50 <sarnold> the lenovo wwan one is weird enough that we want that to go through the weird OEM packages process 14:50 <sarnold> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/+bug/2058192 14:51 <slyon> who would we need to ping about this? 14:51 <sarnold> very good question :) 14:52 <slyon> sarnold: can you check back with the reporter (dirksu) about this? 14:52 * joalif arrived late to the party 14:53 <sarnold> slyon: I think they've got even less experience, heh :/ 14:53 <joalif> slyon ack, I can take it 14:53 <slyon> thx joalif 14:54 <slyon> sarnold: hm. so that "oem-packages-process" would be needed for what exactly? I see the package itself is already in Oracular 14:54 <slyon> (multiverse) 14:54 <sarnold> slyon: the idea / hope is to move it to http://oem.archive.canonical.com/dists/ instead 14:55 <slyon> In which case we could avoid the MIR/security review? 14:55 <sarnold> well, it's a binary blob, there's not a lot to review :( 14:56 <sarnold> but yeah, it probably wouldn't need another look from anyone else here once it's over there 14:56 <slyon> right. Well I have no idea about the OEM archive. Can you maybe add a comment to the LP bug and set it to "Incomplete", so we can bringt it up next time and the package owners have time to react to that comment in the meantime? 14:57 <slyon> Oh there is a comment already 14:58 <slyon> And they seem to be fine. I'll ping sil2100 about it in that case. He might be in the known 14:58 <sarnold> thanks 14:58 <slyon> #topic Any other business? 14:59 <sarnold> I thought I had one but can't remember it now :( 14:59 <slyon> we still have 1 min left to think about it ;-) 14:59 <sarnold> lol 14:59 <sarnold> if the last half hour didn't bring it to the forefront I don't think anothe ten sceonds will help .. 15:00 <slyon> heh 15:00 <slyon> alright then. thanks all! 15:00 <sarnold> thanks slyon :) 15:00 <slyon> #endmeeting