15:01 <juliank> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
15:01 <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:01:16 UTC.  The chair is juliank.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
15:01 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
15:01 <juliank> #topic Lightning rounds
15:01 <juliank> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-2024-07-11/
15:01 <ogayot> o/
15:02 <mateus-morais> o/
15:02 <dviererbe> o/
15:02 <pushkarnk> \o
15:03 * vorlon waves
15:04 <xypron> o/
15:07 <schopin> o/
15:08 <schopin> No status from me right now, I'm a *bit* late and I'd rather read yours ;)
15:09 <bdmurray> I thought hibernate wasn't "supported"
15:09 <mkukri> o/
15:10 <schopin> vorlon: "used my skills as a native speaker of English" Hah!
15:10 <bdmurray> aren't references links?
15:10 <schopin> don't focus on the links
15:10 <vorlon> some of them were actually <link>s :)
15:11 <vorlon> (ok ok <a href)
15:11 <juliank> #topic Team proposed-migration report
15:11 <juliank> (no incoming bugs today!)
15:12 <bdmurray> speaking of native english "Begun investigating"?
15:12 <juliank> #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
15:12 <juliank> vorlon: You weren't here last week, but we have a new tool for proposed migration!
15:12 <juliank> But it's an internal link
15:12 <schopin> we do?
15:12 <vorlon> ?
15:13 <vorlon> so are we not doing rls incoming bugs first?
15:14 <schopin> Apparently no incoming bugs today.
15:14 <schopin> We're doing too good a job.
15:14 <vorlon> for any series? ok
15:14 <bdmurray> I did have a question about bug 2043820
15:14 <bdmurray> enr0n: were you going to pick that up again?
15:15 <schopin> I also have one that I didn't tag (because it wouldn't have made it to the page anyway, too late)
15:15 <enr0n> bdmurray: I need to prioritize, but can certainly add it to my backlog
15:16 <schopin> bug 2044104: fheimes thinks it'd be nice to have in Oracular
15:17 <bdmurray> I think it'd be good to sort out the upgrade bug before 24.04.1
15:18 <vorlon> it is tagged foundations-todo
15:18 <vorlon> ... since December
15:19 <schopin> Goes to show how good we are at backlog grooming, I guess?
15:19 <bdrung> I commented it in December
15:19 <enr0n> I can propose this in Debian, sure
15:20 <enr0n> bdmurray: I think that's fine. I just don't know if I will get to it next pulse
15:20 <schopin> re the s390-tools one, I can assign it to me to try and figure out what the next step should be.
15:20 <vorlon> sounds good!
15:21 <vorlon> so, proposed-migration
15:21 <vorlon> pyopenssl: assigned to adrien
15:21 <vorlon> apport: assigned to schopin
15:22 <vorlon> fakeroot: assigned to zhsj
15:22 <vorlon> dh-cargo: assigned to Skia
15:22 <Skia> this one is almost done, you can give me something else if needed
15:22 <vorlon> gcc-13-cargo: assigned to doko, who isn't here?  I might steal this one
15:22 <vorlon> (needs an AA)
15:23 <vorlon> glibc: assigned to schopin
15:23 <vorlon> gcc-defaults, just waiting for gcc-13*
15:24 <vorlon> bpfcc/bpftrace blocking linux; seems this needs assigned out
15:26 <vorlon> mkukri: bpf{cc,trace}
15:26 <vorlon> glibc is blocking linux-meta; but I assume that should be taken from the kernel team side unless they escalate it to us explicitly
15:27 <schopin> I haven't heard anything from them.
15:28 <vorlon> libxml-libxml-perl - ah I see this is a fix from Debian from the thing mentioned in Zixing's +1 maintenance report, which I commented on :)
15:28 <vorlon> so now just blocked on libxml2 itself which is not ours
15:29 <vorlon> and various test failures with new openssl; adrien are you on these, or do you want us to divide them up?
15:29 <adrien> most are DEB_HOST_ARCH
15:29 <adrien> so the question actually goes to bdrung
15:30 <bdrung> for DEB_HOST_ARCH we have our master bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468
15:30 <vorlon> if that's the case then presumably a baseline retest would show they've regressed in the release pocket?
15:30 <adrien> one or two are not and I'll be looking at them (right now I'm doing some python-oauth2client)
15:30 <vorlon> (libtpms is on the list, but shows a test regression only on armhf, hrm)
15:30 <adrien> vorlon: indeed; I don't know if Benjamin has specific plans
15:31 <adrien> baseline failed everywhere else I think :/
15:31 <vorlon> well I'm saying that whoever is responsible for this should just do a --no-proposed rerun of the tests
15:32 <vorlon> adrien, bdrung: so which of you is responsible :)
15:32 <adrien> I can't look at that but probably tomorrow morning
15:32 <bdrung> vorlon, adrien and he can hand over the DEB_HOST_ARCH ones to me
15:33 <vorlon> this is all very confusing and I have just gone ahead and run `retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks openssl --no-proposed` here
15:34 <vorlon> anyway, that's everything for today then
15:34 <vorlon> juliank:
15:34 <juliank> #topic AOB
15:36 <vorlon> sounds like no :)
15:37 <juliank> #endmeeting