== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by juliank, 14 Mar at 15:00 — 15:47 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-03-14-15.00.log.html == Meeting summary == === Lightning rounds === Discussion started by juliank at 15:00. * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-2024-03-14/ (juliank, 15:00) === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by juliank at 15:13. * ''LINK:'' http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-nn-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 15:14) === Team proposed-migration report === Discussion started by juliank at 15:19. * ''LINK:'' https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 15:19) === AOB === Discussion started by juliank at 15:40. == People present (lines said) == * vorlon (56) * juliank (30) * schopin (10) * bdmurray (10) * adrien (6) * upils (5) * bdrung (5) * mateus-morais (4) * enr0n (4) * ginggs (3) * meetingology (2) * zhsj (2) * ogayot (2) * slyon (2) * dbungert (2) * mkukri (2) * Skia (2) * cpete__ (2) * pushkarnk (2) * liushuyu (1) * waveform (1) * danilogondolfo (1) * xypron (1) == Full log == 15:00 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:00 Meeting started at 15:00:38 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:00 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:00 o/ 15:00 o/ 15:00 #topic Lightning rounds 15:00 o/ 15:00 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-2024-03-14/ 15:02 o/ 15:02 o/ 15:02 o/ 15:02 o/ 15:03 o/ 15:04 o/ 15:04 enr0n: is there somebody specific you want to review the polkit-1 change? 15:05 o/ 15:05 bdmurray: yes, I requested seb on the MP 15:06 o/ 15:07 I'd like to see a photo of "bug grooming" 15:08 adrien: what specifically does openssl need to support wrt LTO? 15:09 bdmurray, would "backlog grooming" be more appropriate? 15:10 IDK I just thought it'd be funny to groom a flea / ant. 15:10 do you have nits 15:11 \o 15:11 oh, DST, that's why, and I'll be not so available :/ 15:11 but let me find that 15:11 vorlon: I think adrien meant something related to https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18663 15:12 there are several issues, and at least a recent one with clang and ppc64el 15:12 it all revolves around aliasing 15:12 moreover I'm not sure it brings much performance for openssl 15:12 And it surely murder the build time :) 15:13 bdrung: do you plan to sync libapache2-mod-python ? 15:13 let's move on 15:13 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:13 vorlon: Do you have experience w/ umockdev and the fake devices script in ubuntu-drivers-common? 15:13 schopin: "glibc now treating C.UTF-8 the same way it does C" hmm in what way? I did have a build failure I was debugging recently that was locale-sensitive 15:14 (though I've forgotten which) 15:14 bdmurray: sorry, I don't 15:14 ginggs, yes. thanks for the reminder 15:14 #link http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-nn-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:14 bug 2054716 15:14 vorlon: AIUI it won't even look up translations if the locale is C 15:14 that's well in hand 15:15 schopin: ah - that actually sounds related to the bug I saw 15:15 good to know 15:15 enr0n: Should we just untag the bug or do you want it in jira? 15:16 juliank: let's just untag it 15:16 ack 15:16 bug 2056562 15:17 I think we can actually just respin noble's shim-signed with Breaks: grub-common (= 2.12-1ubuntu3) for the few people affected by this 15:17 It's an ... unconventional use of Breaks, but it avoids order entanglement at upgrade 15:19 and that's it for incoming bugs nothing to see in other releases 15:19 #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:19 #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:19 vorlon: 15:20 does the page load today? let's see 15:20 I find the issue with my proposed-migration is the runners are full so I don't have the results from last weeks items yet 15:20 450 packages needing attention 15:20 libselinux was mentioned in somebody's status report I think? 15:21 adrien but he's AFK right now because DST 15:21 ok 15:21 so I'll leave libselinux with adrien 15:21 waveform: you're still working on python-ldap? 15:22 yup 15:22 is hyask not here? 15:22 ah Skia 15:22 Skia: ^ 15:22 Skia: you're ok to follow through on libbsd vs gvmd? 15:23 python-apt vs apt: juliank 15:23 I'm doing all the apt ones 15:23 ack 15:24 a lot of armhf autopkgtest failures there that need retried with --all-proposed, for sure 15:24 vorlon: yes, it's just been a moving target all the week, but I do plan on continuing to follow this 15:24 mkukri: are you still on dnspython vs samba? 15:24 I'm kind trying to build the recursive list of dependencies and add them as triggers to avoid even more failures from all-proposed 15:25 ack 15:25 I had curl vs nettle assigned last week; this week it looks like curl vs libpsl. anyway this is all tied into the time_t transition, and I'll follow up 15:26 and on libpsl generally 15:26 juliank: does 'all the apt ones' include apt blocking xz-utils on armhf? 15:27 libtirpc: still with liushuyu ? 15:27 well, everything blocking apt 2.7.12->2.17.3ubuntu1 15:27 that seems related yes. I am waiting for a restest to confirm 15:27 *retest 15:27 upils: sorry, which is that in response to? 15:27 apt blocking xz-utils is what upils retried earlier 15:27 yes 15:27 ah yes 15:27 ok 15:28 Any apt/2.7.12 result needs retrying with apt/2.7.13 trigger 15:28 bear in mind that for any autopkgtest failures on armhf specifically, they should be retested with --all-proposed because 99% are going to require this due to time_t 15:28 because apt builds test helpers at test time with now t64 that fail to link against the old t32 library from 2.7.12 15:28 and if that still fails you should check that the package has been rebuilt in -proposed for the new library package name, and if not, arrange no-change rebuilds 15:29 libuv1 is still with mwhudson 15:29 freetype didn't get assigned last week - bdrung can you take it? 15:29 ack 15:29 optipng - bdmurray ? 15:30 libgd2 - cpete__ ? 15:30 bdmurack 15:30 is cpete an internal gcc macro 15:30 ack 15:30 okay 15:30 casper vs plymouth: dbungert 15:30 Tim would like one too 15:31 ack for casper vs plymouth 15:31 slang2: Tim 15:31 nfs-utils vs adsys: danilogondolfo 15:31 pyopenssl: ginggs 15:31 vorlon, ack 15:31 ack 15:32 software-properties vs dconf: ooh it's not a time_t one. xypron 15:32 ok 15:33 xypron: actually there are 3 separate autopkgtest failures on arm64 in response to dconf: software-properties, update-manager, update-notifier. So probably a dconf regression, can you look at all of these please? 15:33 (dconf itself is not ours, so it's ok if the investigation results in turning it over to the Desktop Team to fix) 15:33 libvpx: slyon 15:33 ok 15:33 initramfs-tools vs netplan.io on armhf: mateus-morais 15:34 ack 15:34 libgtk3-perl: enr0n 15:34 vorlon: ack 15:34 software-properties vs gtk+3.0: ogayot 15:34 vorlon, I am taking initramfs-tools vs netplan.io - this needs just some handholding 15:34 vorlon: ack 15:35 ubuntu-release-upgrader vs gtk+2.0: mateus-morais since bdrung is stealing 15:35 vorlon: ok 15:35 (i want to check that the initramfs-tools tests became stable again) 15:35 mateus-morais: please also take update-manager, update-notifier, and vim blocking gtk+3.0 - these are probably all just autopkgtest retries 15:35 ack 15:35 fwupd vs libmbim: pushkarnk 15:36 ack 15:36 pushkarnk: fwupd is also blocking libqmi and modemmanager, so please check on these too, probably same root cause 15:36 vorlon: ok 15:36 pango1.0 vs harfbuzz: schopin 15:36 ack 15:36 schopin: hmmm raqm and pango1.0 both fail on harfbuzz/arm64, please look at both 15:37 ok 15:37 cryptsetup vs jq: zhsj 15:37 and we'll stop there 15:37 anyone who runs out of things to do this week on proposed-migration, there's plenty more ;) 15:37 juliank: back to you 15:37 ack 15:40 #topic AOB 15:40 any other business? 15:40 any other busyness? :D 15:40 busy busy 15:41 I still need to take half a day this month! 15:41 29th afternoon? 15:41 Probably like next Wednesday afternoon? 15:41 I am taking my remaining days at the end of the month 15:41 Rather ad-hoc when it's sunny and nobody wants to meet 15:42 I will be out most of next week. Starting Tuesday afternoon, and will be back the following Monday 15:43 I'll be working in a different location most of next week 15:44 bdmurray: will your working hours change? 15:44 No 15:44 Same time zone 15:47 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)