14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:38 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:30 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )
14:30 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
14:30 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:30 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:30 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:31 <cpaelzer> the old jaraco that we know for openstack
14:31 <slyon> o/
14:31 <cpaelzer> not more yet for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble
14:31 <sarnold> good morning
14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
14:31 <didrocks> o/ (I’m exceptionnally here this week)
14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:31 <cpaelzer> happy, I hope that means no sick-at-home being the reason didrocks
14:32 <cpaelzer> we have a bunch (much less than expected due to massaging dependencies and function) perl items that need review
14:32 <cpaelzer> 5 of them are waiting for a reviewer
14:32 <cpaelzer> I need TBH that I can not take any before the sprint
14:33 <cpaelzer> is any of you having enough capacity to take one for this or next week?
14:33 <didrocks> I can take a second one (I couldn’t due to the sprint and final rush do the one I had previous one) and do it before EOW
14:33 <slyon> I can take one
14:33 <didrocks> next week, I don’t want to commit with the sprint
14:33 <slyon> There's a list of priorities for those MIRs in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/11
14:34 <cpaelzer> of those https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libregexp-common-perl/+bug/2039563 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnet-ip-perl/+bug/2039456 are already assigned
14:35 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnet-idn-encode-perl/+bug/2038929 has been reviewed and back on miriam until action has been taken
14:35 <cpaelzer> let us distribute a few more as we have capacity
14:35 <cpaelzer> slyon: didrocks: could you just pick one each from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir ?
14:35 <slyon> So let me take libfile-sharedir-perl ?
14:35 <cpaelzer> sure
14:36 * slyon assigned himself
14:36 <didrocks> I will take libemail-abstract-perl
14:36 <slyon> didrocks: that's one of the lower priority ones..
14:36 <didrocks> abstract and perl in the same package name, what could go wrong? :)
14:36 <didrocks> ah
14:36 <cpaelzer> in terms of prio according to the post would be better https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libclass-inspector-perl/+bug/2039569
14:36 <didrocks> I got the list the other way around
14:36 <didrocks> good to me, picking that one
14:36 <cpaelzer> ok, we'll slowly churn through all of those
14:36 <didrocks> if I can stay away from any abstraction, that’s a bonus (somewhat :p)
14:36 <cpaelzer> and let us just be happy it seems there won't be ~50 of them
14:37 <didrocks> until debian sync starts, we’ll see…
14:37 <cpaelzer> ok, going on ...
14:37 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
14:37 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:38 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:40 <slyon> I think there's nothing actionable here
14:40 <slyon> the libnet-idn-encode-perl MIR might be dropped by changing to another dependency, which is already in main
14:40 <cpaelzer> agreed
14:40 <didrocks> agreed
14:40 <cpaelzer> leaving the check of that to miriam
14:40 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
14:41 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
14:41 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
14:41 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
14:41 <cpaelzer> the renovate auto branch is handled
14:41 <cpaelzer> we can close #38
14:41 <slyon> +1
14:42 <cpaelzer> all the others are long term cases waiting for the right time
14:42 <cpaelzer> nothing to act
14:42 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
14:42 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
14:42 <cpaelzer> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.
14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:42 <cpaelzer> Internal link
14:42 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
14:42 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
14:43 <cpaelzer> slyon: seeing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libemail-simple-perl/+bug/2031491 in there
14:43 <eslerm> not much news, we've been discussing perl fuzzing and Andrei is writing documentation tips
14:43 <cpaelzer> slyon: was my explanation of not being a dup enough that we mark it new?
14:44 <eslerm> this work will begin after the sprint, we'll likely have several dedicated people involved
14:44 <eslerm> a deadline by NN has been agreed to with Miriam
14:45 <cpaelzer> ok, thanks eslerm
14:45 * slyon reading context on libemail-simple-perl
14:46 <slyon> Okay. I requested a differentiation of the two stacks. You came to the conclusion that they should be considered non-duplicates.
14:46 <cpaelzer> yes
14:46 <slyon> So having that in the security queue seems correct. right?
14:46 <cpaelzer> it is like mutt and thunderbird :-) but for perl
14:47 <slyon> ACK. wfm
14:47 <cpaelzer> thanks, I updated the case
14:47 <slyon> But I guess we still need security ACK for the other/new stack
14:47 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
14:47 <sarnold> ha :)
14:47 <cpaelzer> yes we still need security, it is only back to "new" not to and "final and done" state
14:48 <sarnold> my apologies for not getting the scheduling survey done :( it's been busy that it's always fallen out of my mental todo list
14:48 <didrocks> you are not the only one :)
14:48 <cpaelzer> exactly
14:48 <eslerm> it would be nice to meet up during the sprint
14:48 <didrocks> but yeah, would be great to settle that for post-sprint
14:48 <sarnold> and i'll send my apologies for next week
14:48 <cpaelzer> ha eslerm, that was just what I wanted to ask
14:48 <eslerm> :)
14:48 <cpaelzer> should I schedule something in Riga engineering week?
14:49 <cpaelzer> give me an agenda item or two worth to see you over more than just a beer at a bar :-)
14:49 <sarnold> I'd very much like us all to get together and have it be scheduled so that we don't wind up with yet another sprint with only half of us getting together
14:49 <slyon> Yes, please. Maybe we can just use the usual MIR meeting slot, as we've done in the past?
14:49 <didrocks> I think it’s been quite some time we haven’t done that, it would be great, but quick, the calendars are filing up quite fast :p
14:49 <didrocks> as long as it’s booked to not be double booked, I’m fine
14:50 <sarnold> yes :( so much double and triple-booking :(
14:50 <cpaelzer> yes
14:50 <cpaelzer> let me have a look right now ...
14:50 <didrocks> but the MIR meeting slot is already booked for me in my case :/
14:51 <cpaelzer> them original slot is gone for me too
14:52 <cpaelzer> friday after lunch or before lightning talks is available to all of us
14:53 <eslerm> after lunch sounds nice, in case people wanted to meet for lunch as well
14:53 <cpaelzer> yep
14:53 <didrocks> sounds good to me :)
14:53 <slyon> wfm
14:54 <cpaelzer> sent
14:54 <cpaelzer> thanks
14:54 <cpaelzer> anything else?
14:54 <sarnold> thanks! \o/
14:54 <sarnold> nothing else from me
14:55 <cpaelzer> neither from me
14:55 <didrocks> thanks!
14:55 <slyon> nothing
14:55 <cpaelzer> ok
14:55 <slyon> thanks cpaelzer, all!
14:55 <cpaelzer> next week some of us will be at the planning sprint already
14:55 <cpaelzer> might be rather silent here
14:55 <cpaelzer> whoever is left can lead the lonely meeting then
14:55 <cpaelzer> bye
14:55 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting