14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:38 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:30 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:30 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches 14:30 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:30 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:30 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> the old jaraco that we know for openstack 14:31 <slyon> o/ 14:31 <cpaelzer> not more yet for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble 14:31 <sarnold> good morning 14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs 14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:31 <didrocks> o/ (I’m exceptionnally here this week) 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:31 <cpaelzer> happy, I hope that means no sick-at-home being the reason didrocks 14:32 <cpaelzer> we have a bunch (much less than expected due to massaging dependencies and function) perl items that need review 14:32 <cpaelzer> 5 of them are waiting for a reviewer 14:32 <cpaelzer> I need TBH that I can not take any before the sprint 14:33 <cpaelzer> is any of you having enough capacity to take one for this or next week? 14:33 <didrocks> I can take a second one (I couldn’t due to the sprint and final rush do the one I had previous one) and do it before EOW 14:33 <slyon> I can take one 14:33 <didrocks> next week, I don’t want to commit with the sprint 14:33 <slyon> There's a list of priorities for those MIRs in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/11 14:34 <cpaelzer> of those https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libregexp-common-perl/+bug/2039563 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnet-ip-perl/+bug/2039456 are already assigned 14:35 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnet-idn-encode-perl/+bug/2038929 has been reviewed and back on miriam until action has been taken 14:35 <cpaelzer> let us distribute a few more as we have capacity 14:35 <cpaelzer> slyon: didrocks: could you just pick one each from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir ? 14:35 <slyon> So let me take libfile-sharedir-perl ? 14:35 <cpaelzer> sure 14:36 * slyon assigned himself 14:36 <didrocks> I will take libemail-abstract-perl 14:36 <slyon> didrocks: that's one of the lower priority ones.. 14:36 <didrocks> abstract and perl in the same package name, what could go wrong? :) 14:36 <didrocks> ah 14:36 <cpaelzer> in terms of prio according to the post would be better https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libclass-inspector-perl/+bug/2039569 14:36 <didrocks> I got the list the other way around 14:36 <didrocks> good to me, picking that one 14:36 <cpaelzer> ok, we'll slowly churn through all of those 14:36 <didrocks> if I can stay away from any abstraction, that’s a bonus (somewhat :p) 14:36 <cpaelzer> and let us just be happy it seems there won't be ~50 of them 14:37 <didrocks> until debian sync starts, we’ll see… 14:37 <cpaelzer> ok, going on ... 14:37 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:37 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:38 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:40 <slyon> I think there's nothing actionable here 14:40 <slyon> the libnet-idn-encode-perl MIR might be dropped by changing to another dependency, which is already in main 14:40 <cpaelzer> agreed 14:40 <didrocks> agreed 14:40 <cpaelzer> leaving the check of that to miriam 14:40 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:41 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:41 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:41 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:41 <cpaelzer> the renovate auto branch is handled 14:41 <cpaelzer> we can close #38 14:41 <slyon> +1 14:42 <cpaelzer> all the others are long term cases waiting for the right time 14:42 <cpaelzer> nothing to act 14:42 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:42 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:42 <cpaelzer> Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:42 <cpaelzer> Internal link 14:42 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 14:42 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:42 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:43 <cpaelzer> slyon: seeing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libemail-simple-perl/+bug/2031491 in there 14:43 <eslerm> not much news, we've been discussing perl fuzzing and Andrei is writing documentation tips 14:43 <cpaelzer> slyon: was my explanation of not being a dup enough that we mark it new? 14:44 <eslerm> this work will begin after the sprint, we'll likely have several dedicated people involved 14:44 <eslerm> a deadline by NN has been agreed to with Miriam 14:45 <cpaelzer> ok, thanks eslerm 14:45 * slyon reading context on libemail-simple-perl 14:46 <slyon> Okay. I requested a differentiation of the two stacks. You came to the conclusion that they should be considered non-duplicates. 14:46 <cpaelzer> yes 14:46 <slyon> So having that in the security queue seems correct. right? 14:46 <cpaelzer> it is like mutt and thunderbird :-) but for perl 14:47 <slyon> ACK. wfm 14:47 <cpaelzer> thanks, I updated the case 14:47 <slyon> But I guess we still need security ACK for the other/new stack 14:47 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business? 14:47 <sarnold> ha :) 14:47 <cpaelzer> yes we still need security, it is only back to "new" not to and "final and done" state 14:48 <sarnold> my apologies for not getting the scheduling survey done :( it's been busy that it's always fallen out of my mental todo list 14:48 <didrocks> you are not the only one :) 14:48 <cpaelzer> exactly 14:48 <eslerm> it would be nice to meet up during the sprint 14:48 <didrocks> but yeah, would be great to settle that for post-sprint 14:48 <sarnold> and i'll send my apologies for next week 14:48 <cpaelzer> ha eslerm, that was just what I wanted to ask 14:48 <eslerm> :) 14:48 <cpaelzer> should I schedule something in Riga engineering week? 14:49 <cpaelzer> give me an agenda item or two worth to see you over more than just a beer at a bar :-) 14:49 <sarnold> I'd very much like us all to get together and have it be scheduled so that we don't wind up with yet another sprint with only half of us getting together 14:49 <slyon> Yes, please. Maybe we can just use the usual MIR meeting slot, as we've done in the past? 14:49 <didrocks> I think it’s been quite some time we haven’t done that, it would be great, but quick, the calendars are filing up quite fast :p 14:49 <didrocks> as long as it’s booked to not be double booked, I’m fine 14:50 <sarnold> yes :( so much double and triple-booking :( 14:50 <cpaelzer> yes 14:50 <cpaelzer> let me have a look right now ... 14:50 <didrocks> but the MIR meeting slot is already booked for me in my case :/ 14:51 <cpaelzer> them original slot is gone for me too 14:52 <cpaelzer> friday after lunch or before lightning talks is available to all of us 14:53 <eslerm> after lunch sounds nice, in case people wanted to meet for lunch as well 14:53 <cpaelzer> yep 14:53 <didrocks> sounds good to me :) 14:53 <slyon> wfm 14:54 <cpaelzer> sent 14:54 <cpaelzer> thanks 14:54 <cpaelzer> anything else? 14:54 <sarnold> thanks! \o/ 14:54 <sarnold> nothing else from me 14:55 <cpaelzer> neither from me 14:55 <didrocks> thanks! 14:55 <slyon> nothing 14:55 <cpaelzer> ok 14:55 <slyon> thanks cpaelzer, all! 14:55 <cpaelzer> next week some of us will be at the planning sprint already 14:55 <cpaelzer> might be rather silent here 14:55 <cpaelzer> whoever is left can lead the lonely meeting then 14:55 <cpaelzer> bye 14:55 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting