15:01 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:01 Meeting started at 15:01:30 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:01 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:01 o/ 15:01 o/ 15:01 #topic Lightning rounds 15:01 * vorlon waves 15:01 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-24-aug-2023/ 15:01 o/ 15:02 \o 15:02 o/ 15:02 \o 15:03 cantankerous 15:03 occasionally :) 15:03 moo? 15:03 DPaaS 15:03 o/ 15:03 I just couldn't come up with a good acronym... 15:04 o/ 15:09 o/ 15:10 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:10 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:10 bug 2031909 15:11 schopin: ^ 15:12 Oh right. danilogondolfo fixed the symptoms, but I'm a bit worried about it still since the fix is to double the applied limit, which seems excessive. 15:13 juliank: I didn't notice if you replied to my last ping; are all the grub zfs regressions sorted now in mantic(-proposed)? 15:13 So I think we need to take the time to investigate it some more to see if that's not an actual bug in glibc that causes excess memory usage. 15:13 well, to be fair, the was a patch already increasing that limit, I just increased it a bit more :) 15:13 The patch was going from 3 to 4, you went straight to 8 :D 15:14 why not 11? 15:14 vorlon: to the best of my knowledge they should be, yes, I don't remember seing a ping 15:14 juliank: ack thanks 15:15 bdmurray, next glibc will require 11 I'm pretty sure 15:15 should we tag this todo? 15:15 someone will complain about this later likely :D 15:15 I say yes (obviously) 15:16 counting down from 3 15:16 0 15:16 Added the tag 15:16 bug 2031685 15:16 some vorlon font stuff 15:17 if we wind up excluding rust-doc from main, then this doesn't need to be foundations-todo 15:17 but it's still a bug :) 15:17 We already matain a delta/are ahead so it wouldn't be a hard hit to do that 15:18 the dependency on fonts-nanum is itself a delta 15:18 vorlon: is rust-doc demotion in progress? should we revisit this next week then? 15:18 all of rust is currently in universe (still) 15:18 I wouldn't say it's in progress; it was a suggestion from (I think) slyon in response to this 15:18 pending security review of cargo 15:19 vorlon: I think excluding rust-doc was suggested as part of the initial MIR 15:19 slyon: can you point me to the bug? we could add it to Extra-Excludes: now and drop this off the list 15:19 definitely was. 15:20 vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/1957932/comments/3 15:20 "Specific binary packages built, but NOT to be promoted to main: rust-doc, rust-src, rust-all" 15:21 +1 15:21 thanks, let's lose the tag then 15:22 ack 15:22 bug 2017401 15:22 I think next step is meeting and discussing 15:22 but also server is doing stuff 15:23 and bug 2029148 is a desktop issue 15:23 this bug report is simply about the regression in support for the Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot option 15:24 probably should be retagged rls-nn-incoming given the recent email to ubuntu-devel 15:24 I thought it was agreed we should JFDI 15:24 bdmurray: sorry, which email? 15:24 bdmurray: is talking about the cups snap thing.. 15:24 right 15:24 ah right 15:25 2017401 - it's a functional regression. JFDI! 15:25 I don't think we had a conclusion for the u-u bug last week and wanted to discuss further outside the meeting but didn't 15:25 I'll setup the meeting 15:26 we're not livepatch PM 15:27 let's go to the next list 15:27 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:27 that one is empty, sorry 15:27 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:27 bug 1990798 15:28 seems wrong to me, why would it fail? 15:29 we don't add the repository if it's not enabled... 15:30 I mean there must be a bug in the pro client there 15:30 also that pro client seemingly doesn't know about esm-apps, only infra, hmm 15:31 let me add an ubuntu-advantage-tools entry and set the one u-r-u one to Incomplete, because we need more info from the pro people what's going on 15:33 very weird 15:33 that wraps up the incoming bugs 15:33 (ff is empty) 15:33 #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:33 #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:33 I see ginggs created https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-5187 15:33 and the report is out of date apparently, not sure what we can do? 15:34 2023.08.24 05:52:36 UTC 15:34 we can assign from what's there and if that means people get a free pass, so be it 15:34 ack 15:34 danilogondolfo: any progress on vim? 15:34 danilogondolfo: fwiw ppc64el is known to have less locked memory available than other archs 15:35 vorlon, yes, I got it building on ppc64el. I'm still testing it 15:35 ok cool 15:35 lots of "depends on glibc" - schopin what's the prognosis here? is more help still needed? 15:35 bdrung: libregexp-pattern-license-perl, carry-over for you? 15:35 I can take libstring-license-perl, it probably needs a rebase of my previous component-mismatch handling. (cc bdrung) 15:36 ack, libregexp-pattern-license-perl vs libstring-license-perl moved to slyon 15:36 vorlon: The MPI thing is sorted but the glibc/armhf one is still a mystery. ginggs suggests we hint it anyway since it's actively being worked on 15:36 vorlon, i only looked quickly into libregexp-pattern-license-perl. I spend more time on ubiquity. 15:36 slyon, do you want to take it over? 15:36 yes 15:36 glibc * requires glibc to migrate ya think 15:37 * juliank hates glibc 15:37 ginggs: are you following up on glibc then? 15:37 juliank: me too, this week. 15:37 yes, i'll follow up 15:37 juliank: are you still working on tzdata? 15:37 btw, the casper autopkgtest seems to be flaky 15:38 vorlon: I don't think I ever started, I forgot to put it into the pulse or something 15:38 so I will start working on it :D 15:38 juliank: ok 15:39 schopin, ginggs: I also still see combblas/armhf, h5py/armhf and mumax3/arm64 autopkgtest regressions outstanding on this report, are those being worked on? 15:40 combblas, h5py are all MPI related 15:40 first two are MPI-related 15:40 ubiquity I'm giving back to mwhudson, I think we triaged this to needing another git dance with tzsetup from Debian; if he's not going to work on it he can pass it on to someone else 15:40 mumax is being worked on by mitchdz right now, it's presumably nvcc weirdness. 15:41 ginggs, schopin: ack. Are we going to hold up for a resolution on mumax3 before migrating? 15:41 vorlon, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2031838 the ticket for ubiquity 15:41 systemd: enr0n are you folliwng through on this? 15:41 vorlon: yes 15:42 krb5, I'll take 15:42 s390-tools needs unapproved processing by an AA, I'll sort it 15:42 i don't think we need to wait for a fix for mumax3, but if we want, a quick fix would be to make it amd64 only, it is not built on arm64 in debian, and did not build in jammy 15:42 vorlon: it also needs MIR 15:43 slyon: which, s390-tools? 15:43 yes 15:43 new dep? 15:43 pulling in some of the rust ecosystem 15:43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2030482 15:43 well I'll let the MIR be Frank's problem 15:43 ACtually it's mine, but sure :) 15:43 anyway, that's everything - long list of packages on here but mostly just waiting for glibc 15:44 juliank: 15:45 #topic AOB 15:45 any other business? 15:45 ginggs: I agree with ignoring mumax3 autopkgtest regression and if it ftbfs we can just remove the arm64 binaries in parallel 15:45 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=mantic&arch=amd64&package=casper&trigger=initramfs-tools/0.142ubuntu12 gave me a "A server error occurred. Please contact the administrator." 15:45 oh apparently I might have to take Monday half? off, seems a friend is going to be here 15:46 vorlon: i've confirmed mumax3 does already FTBFS on arm64 15:46 do we need to make it Architecture: amd64 ? 15:46 the administrators are looking at it 15:46 bdrung: see QA channel in MM 15:46 schopin: oh krb5 is missing strlcat/strlcpy symbols, can I sync with you quickly afterwards about this? 15:46 i might do the same as juliank on monday (family visit) 15:47 vorlon: sure. 15:47 vorlon: this is already be discussed on Debian bug #1043184 15:47 zhsj: thanks for the pointer 15:49 I think that wraps it up here 15:49 #endmeeting