14:31 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:31 Meeting started at 14:31:54 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:31 o/ 14:31 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:31 good morning 14:32 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:32 o/ 14:32 #topic current component mismatches 14:32 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:32 o/ 14:32 To keep things in consumable chunks the first 6 of the perl deps for spamassassin are now up 14:32 see the red color 14:32 o/ 14:32 we'll get to that when assigning new MIR cases for review 14:32 nvmse-stas was considerd ready, but waiting dor dasbus 14:33 which is on security atm 14:33 nothing else new here AFAICS 14:34 even nothing new in proposed 14:34 which feels right given we are in feature freeze 14:34 libei is now ready for security, too (but also some TODOs for jbicha) 14:34 good to know 14:34 now I wonder about the flood of FFEs :) 14:34 👍 14:34 dracut also is ok, will enter security later on (for next cycle) 14:35 but for now we agreed on a package splitting that allows to pass just a minimal thing without 14:35 nice! 14:35 it is back on bdrung to get this in place 14:35 ACK 14:35 #topic New MIRs 14:35 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 uh wow 10 14:36 so much for "not much because of FF" 14:36 but as I said 14:36 6 of them are meant to be trivial perl cases 14:36 back in the day they almost got no review, that isn't how we should do it again 14:36 but really, structurally they are mostly a mechanical repack of the perl modules 14:36 with auto-autopkgtest and usually good test sets 14:37 with small and well defined use cases 14:37 being on the hotpath for handling email they deserve a reasonable look 14:37 So I'd wonder if we can distribute those to just one person as they'd all feel very similar 14:37 lintian modules are something else 14:37 indeed 14:37 I was just going there sarnold 14:38 It will not be no review, but by structurally sharing that much there likely would be a huge efficiency gain by one doing them all 14:38 that is what I wanted to say :-) 14:38 that makes sense, yes 14:38 so I'm looking for a volunteer for 6xsupposed-to-be-simple cases 14:38 I could probably take 2-3 of those for next week, assuming they are small. But probably not all of them 14:38 I can also take some 14:39 it is actually 8, so how about 4 each but no complaining stares if not all of them are done next week? 14:39 +1 14:39 sure 14:40 assigned 14:41 cpaelzer, I just uploaded dracut 059-4ubuntu2 that splits out dracut-install. Should I assign the ticket back to you? 14:41 update the bug, set it back to new and unassign yourself 14:41 bdrung: ^^ 14:42 and I guess make the seed or dependency change that will pull it in 14:42 once all is in place ping one from the team here to ack for the promotion of dracut-install 14:42 thanks. I am working on the initramfs-tools change now. 14:42 we'll set the state to "in progress" reflecting that 14:42 Then subscribe ubuntu archive admins to do the promotion 14:43 ok 14:43 ok, in terms of reviews two more to g 14:43 go 14:43 I'll take gnome-clocks, because why not 14:43 leaved https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pappl-retrofit/+bug/2031814 unassigned 14:43 missing didier who is out atm 14:44 we have assigned more than we commted to be able to do each week (due to those perly things) 14:44 so I think this one has to wait 14:44 s/commted/committed/ 14:44 I agree 14:45 and of course this is a late "needs to be in 23.10" *sigh* 14:45 but still we are humans and have plenty of other tasks 14:45 I think that is ok, re-eval next week 14:45 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:45 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:45 dracut was clarified above 14:46 s390x-tools and rust has gotten a block-proposed update 14:46 most recent actual change is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531 14:46 hmm, that is a response to the review 14:46 I need to read that with some time 14:46 since I've done the review 14:47 opic Process/Documentation improvements 14:47 Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:47 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:47 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:47 Greet new contributers on first issue/pr #37 https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/37 14:48 that is a nice idea, but also so new the tests didn't run yet right? 14:48 Github queue seems to be long today, the Ci was just not run yet 14:49 I generally like this idea 14:49 Maybe s/GMT/UTC/, otherwise lgtm. 14:49 where you able to pre-test this somehow dviererbe? 14:50 Kind of yes here: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/actions/runs/5939665817/job/16106543321 but I oriented myself on the config of other repos that used the action 14:50 ok, nice 14:50 https://grep.app/search?q=%20%20%20%20%20%20uses%3A%20actions/first-interaction%40v1 14:50 dviererbe: do we need to install the "secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN" somehow? 14:51 how about this - fix the GMT/UTC and allow time to pass for any potential further reviewers 14:51 No this is a environment variable that gets injected by the action runner 14:51 then we can land once tests also have ran e.g. in next weeks meeting 14:51 ok 14:51 Than I also should replace it in the Readme.md 14:51 Thats where I took it from 14:52 is that what we have oO 14:52 let me look at the invite what TZ we have set for real 14:52 well.. yeah. It's more of a nitpick. We can also keep it as-is. 14:52 it is actually "4.30pm CET" 14:52 cpaelzer: I think giving the real TZ make sense, as that would account for time shifts 14:52 how about chaning .md and this to that value 14:52 https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/blob/bb1087152706f72aa0c535a20dde5c72a442033b/README.md?plain=1#L1073 14:52 hah, it's in there twice 14:52 so that git matches the calendar 14:52 (Tuesdays 15:30-16:00 GMT) near the end 14:53 I change it 14:53 2023-08-22 14:52:58 < sarnold> (Tuesdays 15:30-16:00 GMT) near the end 14:53 well and this PR, other than adding the nice welcome 14:53 funny enough, that second one is just plain wrong part of the year :) 14:53 could sync all those mentions with the calendar entry we have 14:53 dviererbe: ok with that? 14:53 Yes :) 14:54 next is https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/36 14:54 woot, thanks dviererbe :) 14:54 which we had some approval when discussing 14:54 but now have PR actually writing about it 14:54 no need to read it now 14:54 but before next week an ack or feedback would be nice 14:54 ok? 14:54 ack 14:54 ok, the rest is old/draft 14:55 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:55 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:55 Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:55 Internal link 14:55 - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 14:55 - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:55 #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:55 never heard of semgrep_rules_manager 14:55 why is that in this kanban board at all? 14:55 I'll add libei to our jira board 14:55 thanks eslerm 14:56 about dracut 14:56 while we split things out and promote a very small subset now 14:56 this would also want to be added to the security board tracking 14:56 even not yet being assigned to you on the bug 14:56 that is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dracut/+bug/2031304 14:56 would you be able to add that as well? 14:56 can do 14:56 the rest looks kind of "as expected" 14:57 heif and siblings to fully complete soon or 24.04 the ltest 14:57 stuff in progress 14:57 all good AFAICS 14:57 keeping time in mind let me call for 14:57 #topic Any other business? 14:57 none here 14:57 heif had a block last week, let me find it 14:57 eslerm: I added some update comments to the heif related MIRs 14:58 pfsmorigo: I was wondering about the state of cargo? 14:58 ack, thanks I'll follow up 14:58 I didn't want to ask about cargo given the time, but you are right to do so ... :-/ 14:58 Seth, can you answer for Paulo please 14:59 slyon: pfsmorigo has written a report on it, and I've not yet had the time to read his report :( 14:59 sarnold: can we see that report somewhere, or is it still internal? 14:59 slyon: yeah I could bounce you a copy 14:59 that be great, thanks 15:00 nothing else from my side 15:00 next meeting is starting and nothing else 15:00 eek thanks for the 'next meeting' reminder 15:00 I swear if my head weren't bolted on.. 15:00 hehe 15:00 :D 15:01 thanks 15:01 see you all 15:01 #endmeeting