15:02 <juliank> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
15:02 <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:02:28 UTC.  The chair is juliank.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
15:02 <juliank> #topic Lightning rounds
15:02 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
15:02 <juliank> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-22-jun-2023/36471
15:02 <juliank> uh
15:02 <juliank> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-22-jun-2023/36471
15:03 <juliank> I missed the chance to write status being involved in too much mattermost chatter
15:05 <bdmurray> Part of me feels like codespell will make it harder for people to contribute.
15:07 <vorlon> schopin: where is GNU Cauldron this year?
15:07 <schopin> bdmurray: the same argument could be made of code formatters
15:07 <schopin> vorlon: Cambridge. Damn Brexit.
15:07 <bdmurray> schopin: That's true
15:08 <vorlon> schopin: lol
15:09 <juliank> #topic Release incoming bugs
15:09 <juliank> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
15:10 <juliank> bug 2021531
15:14 <schopin> This autopkgtest failure is very probably a rustc issue. The question is whether it's an issue in the general unwind code, or just the libtest framework, in which case it would only affect the distro development, not production code.
15:15 <schopin> liushuyu accepted to investigate to at least determin that. I'll take care of patching out the rust-gio test in the mean time to get the package moving.
15:17 <juliank> ll, jj, ff are empty, hooray
15:17 <juliank> #topic Team proposed-migration report
15:17 <juliank> #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
15:18 <bdrung> i'll take python-tz
15:18 <vorlon> fwupd is in progress (bdmurray, liushuyu), being investigated upstream
15:19 <vorlon> btrfs-progs looks like it may be regressed on s390x.  any volunteers?
15:19 <vorlon> ok rolling dice
15:19 <vorlon> mateus-morais: can you take btrfs-progs?
15:20 * juliank is running behind his plans and off tomorrow so prefers not to pick anything
15:21 <mateus-morais> vorlon: yeah
15:21 <vorlon> libwww-mechanize-perl: interestingly this seems to have made it into Debian testing without the autopkgtests ever running :P https://ci.debian.net/packages/libw/libwww-mechanize-perl/
15:22 <vorlon> danilogondolfo: can you take libwww-mechanize-perl?
15:22 <danilogondolfo> vorlon, sure
15:22 <vorlon> libwww-perl has an outstanding MIR, nothing for us right now
15:22 <vorlon> python-tz: bdrung
15:22 <ogayot> I can take pyparted
15:22 <ogayot> pyparted / parted I guess
15:23 <slyon> well.. the libwww-mechanize-perl 2.17-1 did run on DebCi (and passed), but there wasn't yet a migration-reference/0 run since then.
15:23 <vorlon> setuptools: enr0n?
15:23 <enr0n> vorlon: ack
15:23 <vorlon> slyon: ah ok - versions reported on the main page as 2.16-1 everywhere
15:23 <vorlon> ogayot: will you take care of parted vs livecd-rootfs as part of that?
15:24 <ogayot> vorlon: yes
15:24 <vorlon> pyparted / parted / livecd-rootfs: ogayot
15:24 <slyon> right. I think the main page only shows the last migration-reference/0 but danilogondolfo should have a look at https://ci.debian.net/packages/libw/libwww-mechanize-perl/testing/amd64/ and compare that to our failing tests
15:24 <vorlon> ogayot: thanks
15:24 <vorlon> initramfs-tools is a candidate but hasn't migrated yet, I'll take a look there
15:24 <vorlon> that leaves python-reportlab vs python-biopython
15:24 <vorlon> anyone want one who doesn't have one yet?
15:25 <slyon> I can
15:25 <vorlon> python-reportlab: slyon
15:25 <vorlon> thanks!
15:25 <vorlon> juliank: back to you
15:25 <juliank> #topic AOB
15:25 <bdrung> vorlon, I am interested in the reason why initramfs-tools did not migrate.
15:26 <vorlon> bdrung: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_output.txt says it makes livecd-rootfs uninstallable on i386
15:26 <juliank> I'm out tomorrow
15:27 <vorlon> bdrung: do you want to just mark the isc-dhcp-client dep !i386?
15:27 <dviererbe> I'm out tomorrow too
15:27 <bdrung> vorlon, yes
15:27 <vorlon> ok sorted then \o/
15:28 <juliank> final call!
15:28 <vorlon> bdrung: btw I believe we previously relied on isc-dhcp-client being a dependency of ubuntu-minimal, so didn't worry about a direct dep from initramfs-tools
15:28 <vorlon> and oi what are you doing introducing deps on deprecated things? :)
15:29 <bdrung> vorlon, for the transition: move the isc-dhcp-client dependency from ubuntu-minimal to initramfs-tools. Second step: replace isc-dhcp-client by dhcpcd-base there.
15:29 <vorlon> ah I don't see much need for the intermediate step but, well
15:30 <bdrung> vorlon, for the added autopkgtests
15:30 <vorlon> ok (could also be just a test dep, but enough bikeshedding)
15:30 <bdrung> either the package or the test case needs to depend on it.
15:30 <juliank> so the autopkgtest pass first, then you upload new one and if they fail they block?
15:30 <juliank> oh well I think this is details now we don't need to group discuss :)
15:30 <juliank> #endmeeting