14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:27 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:30 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )
14:30 <sarnold> good morning
14:30 <jamespage> o/
14:31 <slyon> o/
14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:31 <cpaelzer> nothing new in non-proposed
14:32 <cpaelzer> hmm
14:32 <slyon> geoip looks new
14:32 <slyon> is the server team tracking that?
14:32 <cpaelzer> nginx -> geoip sounds familiar
14:32 <cpaelzer> I think we changed to geoip2 two cycles back
14:32 <cpaelzer> I'll take care to check what is going on
14:32 <cpaelzer> I see that openstack started on jaraco
14:33 <cpaelzer> and then there is transmission
14:33 <cpaelzer> Desktop package
14:33 <sarnold> mantic-proposed has a 'drop geoip' in the changelog https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+changelog -- it might solve itself in a few days? :)
14:34 <cpaelzer> didrocks isn't here today to use his Desktop connections, seb128 isn#t her eeither
14:34 <cpaelzer> pinging jbicha if there is any known context on transmission
14:34 <sarnold> * Switch back to gtk4, now that the previous upload migrated.
14:34 <sarnold> the MIR of gtkmm4.0 is planned.
14:34 <jbicha> it's still on my todo list to file the MIRs for gtkmm4.0 (& related pkgs)
14:34 <cpaelzer> ok, we are happy to wait
14:35 <sarnold> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+changelog  -- this one looksl ike the tip of the iceberg for new work, heh
14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: on geoip - the changelog has this under dropped changes
14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: "[No longer required due to Debian packaging split]"
14:35 <sarnold> cpaelzer: oh!
14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: but it seems that didn't fully work, chances are something is now split and meant to migrate to universe
14:35 <cpaelzer> I'll talk with bryce
14:36 <cpaelzer> ok
14:36 <cpaelzer> that means we are ok with all findings in mismatches today
14:36 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
14:36 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
14:36 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:36 <cpaelzer> one new
14:36 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcpcd5/+bug/2019191
14:37 <slyon> this will be the (future) replacement for isc-dhcp-client
14:37 <cpaelzer> Anyone able to do the review and not having Thu (and probably Fri) off due to public holiday in a lot of central europe?
14:38 * slyon abstains, due to it being a Foundations package
14:38 <cpaelzer> yeah, I guess I can take one - but due to said public holiday it will be somewhen next week
14:38 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
14:38 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:38 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:39 <cpaelzer> some updates on duktape, but not yet ready to be acted on
14:39 <cpaelzer> nothing else in this list yet
14:39 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
14:39 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
14:40 <cpaelzer> just my re-review topic which we can handle in AOB
14:40 <cpaelzer> nothing else in those lists
14:40 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
14:40 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:40 <cpaelzer> Internal link
14:40 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
14:40 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
14:40 <cpaelzer> sarnold: this is the time to make progress on those items not being pressing issues
14:40 <cpaelzer> sarnold: because in a month or two the list will be dominated by "I NEED THIS" items
14:41 <cpaelzer> sarnold: so how is current velocity on reviews looking?
14:42 * cpaelzer checks #security channel for distractions of sarnold ...
14:42 <sarnold> cpaelzer: heh, no progress lately; there has been some ongoing work on the tooling to try to improve the tooling. one current hurdle is that our coverity license has expired, and re-signing that contract is stuck somewhere; people are poking and prodding even while on vacation :/
14:43 <cpaelzer> oh
14:43 <sarnold> there's enough folks on post-sprint recovery and lss and so on that we're not yet at full force
14:43 <cpaelzer> so without this license, is review fully blocked ?
14:43 <cpaelzer> or just "less good"
14:43 <sarnold> not completely, but it is enough of a hurdle to be obnoxious
14:43 <cpaelzer> ok, thanks for the FYI
14:43 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
14:44 <cpaelzer> as last week - just https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/17
14:44 <cpaelzer> thanks for your feedback so far
14:44 <cpaelzer> I know I need to create a good way to find those old bugs
14:44 <cpaelzer> but other than that everyone seems happy so far
14:45 <cpaelzer> any other feedback or request for change that didn#t make it into thr github PR?
14:45 <sarnold> I think I forgot to mention a pal's spell checking action https://www.check-spelling.dev/
14:45 <sarnold> if we wanted to keep the spelling in good order, this might be worth dropping in
14:46 <sarnold> but if we make so few changes and spelling doesn't *really* matter, it's just nice to have, it might not be worth the ongoing cost
14:46 <cpaelzer> is that free to activate without pain?
14:46 <dviererbe> *creating a bookmark*
14:46 <sarnold> I think so, but I'm not actually well-versed in github actions; I think it's 'just' a matter of cloning the repo, dropping a .github/ directory thingy in place, pushing it, and letting the bot do the rest
14:47 <cpaelzer> I'll have a look
14:47 <cpaelzer> thanks
14:47 <dviererbe> I can investigate this. I have some experience with github actions
14:47 <slyon> here's a template: https://github.com/check-spelling/spell-check-this
14:48 <cpaelzer> thanks dviererbe for the volunteering
14:48 <cpaelzer> I guess you can fork and experiment there, and once you know how open a PR and/or contact me to get things done in the main repo?
14:49 <dviererbe> I'll do that
14:49 <sarnold> woot, thanks :)
14:49 <cpaelzer> I'll take the todo that slyon gave me to add the "old MIR bug" query
14:49 <cpaelzer> and thereby, the agenda of today is at the end
14:49 <cpaelzer> anything else?
14:49 <sarnold> nothing from me
14:49 <sarnold> except a gigantic curiosity how that 'old mir bug' query will work
14:50 <slyon> nothing, thanks!
14:50 <cpaelzer> sarnold: magic :-)
14:50 <sarnold> I don't have a clue how I'd even start tackling it, if it were my todo :)
14:50 <sarnold> :D
14:50 <slyon> (it's not just "old MIR bug", there might be packages without any bug
14:50 <sarnold> probably about a thousand of them..
14:50 <cpaelzer> hehe
14:50 <cpaelzer> the API isn't too bad
14:50 <cpaelzer> of LP I mean
14:51 <sarnold> I wasn't there, but my guess is the starting point was "what's installed on every one of elmo's computers" :)
14:51 <cpaelzer> It is most likely not a query, but a python program
14:51 <cpaelzer> sarnold: that might have been true :-)
14:51 <cpaelzer> but for today, let us close the meeting here
14:51 <cpaelzer> have fun everyone!
14:51 <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all; enjoy the long weekens, those who have them :)
14:51 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting