14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:27 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:30 <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:30 <sarnold> good morning 14:30 <jamespage> o/ 14:31 <slyon> o/ 14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches 14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> nothing new in non-proposed 14:32 <cpaelzer> hmm 14:32 <slyon> geoip looks new 14:32 <slyon> is the server team tracking that? 14:32 <cpaelzer> nginx -> geoip sounds familiar 14:32 <cpaelzer> I think we changed to geoip2 two cycles back 14:32 <cpaelzer> I'll take care to check what is going on 14:32 <cpaelzer> I see that openstack started on jaraco 14:33 <cpaelzer> and then there is transmission 14:33 <cpaelzer> Desktop package 14:33 <sarnold> mantic-proposed has a 'drop geoip' in the changelog https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+changelog -- it might solve itself in a few days? :) 14:34 <cpaelzer> didrocks isn't here today to use his Desktop connections, seb128 isn#t her eeither 14:34 <cpaelzer> pinging jbicha if there is any known context on transmission 14:34 <sarnold> * Switch back to gtk4, now that the previous upload migrated. 14:34 <sarnold> the MIR of gtkmm4.0 is planned. 14:34 <jbicha> it's still on my todo list to file the MIRs for gtkmm4.0 (& related pkgs) 14:34 <cpaelzer> ok, we are happy to wait 14:35 <sarnold> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+changelog -- this one looksl ike the tip of the iceberg for new work, heh 14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: on geoip - the changelog has this under dropped changes 14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: "[No longer required due to Debian packaging split]" 14:35 <sarnold> cpaelzer: oh! 14:35 <cpaelzer> sarnold: but it seems that didn't fully work, chances are something is now split and meant to migrate to universe 14:35 <cpaelzer> I'll talk with bryce 14:36 <cpaelzer> ok 14:36 <cpaelzer> that means we are ok with all findings in mismatches today 14:36 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs 14:36 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:36 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 <cpaelzer> one new 14:36 <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcpcd5/+bug/2019191 14:37 <slyon> this will be the (future) replacement for isc-dhcp-client 14:37 <cpaelzer> Anyone able to do the review and not having Thu (and probably Fri) off due to public holiday in a lot of central europe? 14:38 * slyon abstains, due to it being a Foundations package 14:38 <cpaelzer> yeah, I guess I can take one - but due to said public holiday it will be somewhen next week 14:38 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:38 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:38 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:39 <cpaelzer> some updates on duktape, but not yet ready to be acted on 14:39 <cpaelzer> nothing else in this list yet 14:39 <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:39 <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:39 <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:40 <cpaelzer> just my re-review topic which we can handle in AOB 14:40 <cpaelzer> nothing else in those lists 14:40 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:40 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:40 <cpaelzer> Internal link 14:40 <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 14:40 <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 14:40 <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:40 <cpaelzer> sarnold: this is the time to make progress on those items not being pressing issues 14:40 <cpaelzer> sarnold: because in a month or two the list will be dominated by "I NEED THIS" items 14:41 <cpaelzer> sarnold: so how is current velocity on reviews looking? 14:42 * cpaelzer checks #security channel for distractions of sarnold ... 14:42 <sarnold> cpaelzer: heh, no progress lately; there has been some ongoing work on the tooling to try to improve the tooling. one current hurdle is that our coverity license has expired, and re-signing that contract is stuck somewhere; people are poking and prodding even while on vacation :/ 14:43 <cpaelzer> oh 14:43 <sarnold> there's enough folks on post-sprint recovery and lss and so on that we're not yet at full force 14:43 <cpaelzer> so without this license, is review fully blocked ? 14:43 <cpaelzer> or just "less good" 14:43 <sarnold> not completely, but it is enough of a hurdle to be obnoxious 14:43 <cpaelzer> ok, thanks for the FYI 14:43 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business? 14:44 <cpaelzer> as last week - just https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/17 14:44 <cpaelzer> thanks for your feedback so far 14:44 <cpaelzer> I know I need to create a good way to find those old bugs 14:44 <cpaelzer> but other than that everyone seems happy so far 14:45 <cpaelzer> any other feedback or request for change that didn#t make it into thr github PR? 14:45 <sarnold> I think I forgot to mention a pal's spell checking action https://www.check-spelling.dev/ 14:45 <sarnold> if we wanted to keep the spelling in good order, this might be worth dropping in 14:46 <sarnold> but if we make so few changes and spelling doesn't *really* matter, it's just nice to have, it might not be worth the ongoing cost 14:46 <cpaelzer> is that free to activate without pain? 14:46 <dviererbe> *creating a bookmark* 14:46 <sarnold> I think so, but I'm not actually well-versed in github actions; I think it's 'just' a matter of cloning the repo, dropping a .github/ directory thingy in place, pushing it, and letting the bot do the rest 14:47 <cpaelzer> I'll have a look 14:47 <cpaelzer> thanks 14:47 <dviererbe> I can investigate this. I have some experience with github actions 14:47 <slyon> here's a template: https://github.com/check-spelling/spell-check-this 14:48 <cpaelzer> thanks dviererbe for the volunteering 14:48 <cpaelzer> I guess you can fork and experiment there, and once you know how open a PR and/or contact me to get things done in the main repo? 14:49 <dviererbe> I'll do that 14:49 <sarnold> woot, thanks :) 14:49 <cpaelzer> I'll take the todo that slyon gave me to add the "old MIR bug" query 14:49 <cpaelzer> and thereby, the agenda of today is at the end 14:49 <cpaelzer> anything else? 14:49 <sarnold> nothing from me 14:49 <sarnold> except a gigantic curiosity how that 'old mir bug' query will work 14:50 <slyon> nothing, thanks! 14:50 <cpaelzer> sarnold: magic :-) 14:50 <sarnold> I don't have a clue how I'd even start tackling it, if it were my todo :) 14:50 <sarnold> :D 14:50 <slyon> (it's not just "old MIR bug", there might be packages without any bug 14:50 <sarnold> probably about a thousand of them.. 14:50 <cpaelzer> hehe 14:50 <cpaelzer> the API isn't too bad 14:50 <cpaelzer> of LP I mean 14:51 <sarnold> I wasn't there, but my guess is the starting point was "what's installed on every one of elmo's computers" :) 14:51 <cpaelzer> It is most likely not a query, but a python program 14:51 <cpaelzer> sarnold: that might have been true :-) 14:51 <cpaelzer> but for today, let us close the meeting here 14:51 <cpaelzer> have fun everyone! 14:51 <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all; enjoy the long weekens, those who have them :) 14:51 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting