== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by vorlon, 11 May at 15:04 — 15:44 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-05-11-15.04.log.html == Meeting summary == === Lightning rounds === Discussion started by vorlon at 15:04. * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679/6 (vorlon, 15:04) * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679 (vorlon, 15:05) === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by vorlon at 15:10. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:10) * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:13) * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:13) * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:24) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:28) === Team proposed-migration report === Discussion started by vorlon at 15:32. * ''LINK:'' https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (vorlon, 15:33) === AOB === Discussion started by vorlon at 15:38. == People present (lines said) == * vorlon (70) * slyon (8) * bdmurray (7) * xypron (4) * dviererbe (4) * adrien (3) * meetingology (2) * enr0n (2) * ogayot (2) * mateus-morais (1) * juliank (1) * zhsj (1) == Full log == 15:04 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:04 Meeting started at 15:04:41 UTC. The chair is vorlon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:04 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:04 #topic Lightning rounds 15:04 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679/6 15:05 giving everybody some time to read through and ask questions 15:05 oops, wrong link 15:05 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679 15:05 mateus-morais: I think your status went to the last discourse post, not this week's 15:06 o/ 15:06 Yep, fixed it already :) 15:07 aha ok 15:07 "man in hat sits on chair" - lol 15:08 haha 15:10 everybody had enough time? 15:10 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:10 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:10 I made -mm- yesterday 15:11 LP: #2012698 15:11 this? https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:12 indeed 15:12 bdmurray: thanks, should I drop -ll- from the script going forward? 15:12 Well we might need to do some SRUs there 15:12 ok 15:12 looks like vanvugt is taking care of that plymouth bug 15:12 yeah the above is a class of issue usually handled in the Desktop Team, nothing for us 15:13 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:13 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:13 LP: #2016471 15:13 I created that one.. 15:14 I'd like the toolchain squad to have a look into it. libomp.so is broken when llvm-toolchain is built with LTO 15:14 slyon: do you expect the fix to be on the eztrace side? that's the task you have in progress 15:14 ah 15:14 the upstream maintainer of eztrace suggested there might be a workaround possible in the upstream project, but didn't get back to be about it yet 15:14 that seems like an appropriate thing for us to take 15:14 shall I target it? 15:15 (doing) 15:15 so either reaching out to trahay about a eztrace fix or fixing llvm-toolchain are appropriate 15:16 there may be other packages affected by libomp though 15:16 (or other third-party projects) 15:16 LP: #2018721 15:16 dviererbe: can you comment on that ^ 15:17 Well I put the summary in the LP ticket 15:20 my $.02 is that there aren't advantages that are worth the switching costs 15:21 dviererbe: are you ok with us declining it on that basis? 15:22 yeah, works for me. I just wanted to have a discussion about investigating this. 15:22 ok thanks 15:24 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:24 LP: #1999345 15:25 there've been discussions about this internally; I'm a strong -1 on us including this in the signed images 15:25 because the GRUB LUKS implementation is always trailing the userspace 15:26 and currently the gaps are that it doesn't support currently-recommended key derivation 15:26 juliank isn't here to argue for it, but I would just decline this one 15:26 (and let him reopen it if there are other arguments) 15:27 any objections? 15:27 sounds good. we have been waiting for any action on that one for too long 15:28 My watch made brr with IRC notification! I'm +1 15:28 hah 15:28 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:29 LP: #2015355 15:29 this was escalated internally to us 15:29 Do we need to keep looking at Focal given Jammy is the latest LTS? 15:30 based on support team's input I would say yes it's worth fixing 15:30 or do you mean looking at the report in general for FF? 15:30 The report in general but I guess if we didn't we wouldn't have known about this. ;-) 15:30 right 15:30 I am planning on working that one, bdmurray pinged me about it before the sprint 15:31 I mean, we did have the internal discussion, but that's different than ensuring it's tracked 15:31 so I'll go ahead and target this one 15:32 ok that's it for bugs 15:32 let's see if I can speed things up a bit from here :) 15:32 #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:33 #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:33 dviererbe: would you mind looking at git? hopefully just needs a retry of linux-lowlatency/arm64 autopkgtest 15:34 I can do that 15:34 argon2 vs cryptsetup: I've looked at this before, argon2 declares versioned breaks: on cryptsetup so this needs solved by a cryptsetup merge. Any volunteers? 15:34 bdrung did the last merge but he's not here today 15:35 adrien: maybe you? 15:35 if not, I could take it 15:35 fakeroot: enr0n? 15:35 vorlon: sure 15:36 pygments: ogayot? 15:36 vorlon: ack 15:36 vorlon: I can look at that 15:36 and then that's it, because 7 was actually 5 because of the double counting of blocked/blocking 15:36 adrien: thanks 15:36 ah, 4 15:37 sbuild also blocking postfix; I'll take that one, it's probably a britney hint issue 15:38 yeah turns out that when postfix fails to configure on amd64 due to weird infra, all the autopkgtests of its reverse-dependencies fail 15:38 #topic AOB 15:38 anything else? 15:39 vorlon: postfix is what I previously looked at. 15:39 * vorlon nods 15:39 Should I try to create a patch for that one. 15:39 I'll be off next Thursday (national holiday) and Friday (swap day) 15:39 same for me ^ 15:40 oh, already? I'm going to be away for half of the pulse actually 15:41 I'll be off both thursday and friday 15:41 i'll be off next friday (swap day) 15:42 I'm out this afternoon and tomorrow 15:43 I have another swap day to take but haven't committed to when 15:43 around otherwise! 15:43 I have only Monday and Tuesday next week to work. 15:44 any other other business? 15:44 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)