15:01 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:01 Meeting started at 15:01:16 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:01 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:01 o/ 15:01 The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-30-march-2023/34842 15:02 Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions 15:02 o/ 15:03 vorlon: you wrote us a novel 15:03 waveform: thanks for all the help this week 15:04 no prob :) 15:04 o/ 15:05 jawn-smith: the character development is a bit meh 15:05 but the markdown format is a little broken? 15:06 is it? I was drafting in a markdown-ignorant editor, so 15:09 Okay sounds like all questions have been asked/answered, so let's move on 15:09 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:09 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:09 bug 2012738 15:10 sounds like it's fixed already. 15:10 Yeah it does, I'll remove the tag 15:11 bug 2012921 15:11 isn't that by design? 15:12 Sounds like it is 15:12 dbungert is going to type up a response, thanks 15:12 the current behavior is by design, Desktop has asked that we give them a control flag, which I intend to provide 15:12 bug 2013188 15:17 bdmurray is going to respond to the bug and waveform is going to do some testing 15:17 bug 2012698 15:18 Sounds like vanvugt is looking into this, so moving on 15:18 that's it for ll 15:18 kk is empty 15:19 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:19 bug 1999345 15:19 Still nothing since January 15:19 appears to still be with the security team, so nothing for us to do 15:19 And that's it for bugs 15:20 #topic proposed-migration 15:20 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:20 sbuild. waveform you have a proposed change to fix this right? 15:20 correct 15:20 and bdrung are you reviewing this? 15:21 yes 15:21 thanks, let's move on 15:22 skipping all of the stuff that is just blocked by the freeze 15:23 curl has some regressions 15:23 oh vorlon uploaded a new version of eye, so it should pass against that 15:23 Everything else is just waiting on tests, so nothing really to do for proposed-migration this week 15:24 Thanks for keeping the queues clean everyone 15:24 everyone except bos01 15:24 #topic AOB 15:24 bug 2013201 was tagged incoming, presumably this is a report issue between the subiquity package and project. 15:24 dbungert: you had a bug you wanted to discuss? 15:25 subiquity has opinions about partition offset and size alignment, but it needs to be more flexible about existing partitions 15:27 Sounds like we're going to fix this 15:28 targetting lunar 15:29 Any other topics? 15:29 Reminder tomorrow is my last day, but I'll still see all of you in IRC as I have time 15:29 bug 2004092 is still weird 15:30 we have a fix in the archive, but not in git. If no better fix is incoming, I'd like to have git match the archive. 15:30 yeah, eye vs curl, test progression not regression 15:31 dbungert: is the fix in the archive something along the lines of "don't try to use a static GID"? 15:32 casper needs fixing to cope with this, for sure 15:32 there's still the systemd bug that it doesn't respect Debian policy wrt adduser config of ID ranges 15:33 enr0n: the fix in the archive is one we have declined to merge in git, I believe it just nudges the starting numbers to allocate IDs 15:34 Right, as I have said before with this bug, the systemd side needs to be further investigated/discussed upstream. But that is independent of the problem that casper should never try to use a static GID. 15:35 So I just want to make sure "better fix" does not imply something changing in systemd, because that won't happen anytime soon. 15:36 right, those two things should be decoupled 15:36 Okay, sounds like we are on the same page 15:37 also if there was an upload that wasn't merged in git then someone's hand needs slapped because lp:casper is listed as the VCS for the package in debian/control 15:37 but none of that is critical for lunar 15:37 vorlon: the MP you declined is in fact in the archive, this is the basic thing I'm trying to resolve 15:37 dbungert: yeah so de facto it should be committed to lp:casper 15:37 because the VCS is supposed to match the archive 15:38 "Steve disapproves of this MP but I'm landing it anyway" is acceptable 15:38 ok, I will fix lp:casper to match the archive, thanks! 15:38 "Steve disapproves of this MP so I'm ignoring the VCS" is not ;) 15:40 #endmeeting