== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by cpaelzer, 28 Feb at 15:29 — 15:58 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-02-28-15.29.log.html == Meeting summary == === current component mismatches === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:33. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (cpaelzer, 15:33) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (cpaelzer, 15:33) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inetutils/+bug/2008789 (slyon, 15:35) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:43. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:44) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:50. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:50) === MIR related Security Review Queue === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:53. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:53) * ''LINK:'' https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 (cpaelzer, 15:53) === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:57. == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (96) * sarnold (10) * eslerm (8) * didrocks (8) * joalif (8) * meetingology (2) * slyon (2) == Full log == 15:29 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 15:29 Meeting started at 15:29:51 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:29 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:29 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage eslerm 15:30 (but I think most foundations stuff should be covered, I left comments where needed) 15:30 good morning o/ 15:30 hi, giving everyone a minute or two for everyone to see th eping 15:30 hi eslerm and slyon 15:30 hey 15:31 o/ 15:33 ok, let me get going ... 15:33 #topic current component mismatches 15:33 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 15:33 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 15:33 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 15:33 we are past FF, so hopefully that is the last huge list 15:34 inetutils is a false positive ont he bug of slyon that tracks those 15:34 but since it was gone and shows up again, I wonder if we can do something about it 15:34 or if someone accidentially promoted something wrong 15:35 perl tihngs are assigned already 15:35 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inetutils/+bug/2008789 15:35 uh slyon, in that csae let me remove it from bug 1980663 15:35 good morning 15:35 o/ 15:36 done 15:36 now it will find the right bug 15:36 interesting 15:36 maybe sarnold or eslerm can clarify https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdp-tools/+bug/2002103 15:36 just a note, the component mismatches svg is difficult to read with color blindness (protanopia and deuteranopia) 15:36 eslerm: patches welcome 15:37 while you look into that - python-oslo has got bugs filed for their dependencies by jamespage and team - I guess those are under control 15:37 python-yappi seems not yet covered there 15:38 openstack dep? 15:38 oh crap, I didn't see ndctl yet 15:38 didrocks: yes yappi seems openstack (from python-oslo) 15:38 cpaelzer: xdp-tools looks ready to migrate to main 15:38 thanks sarnold 15:40 I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2008799 for ndctl 15:40 (obligatory thinking aloud that a tracking process like the kernel team sru workflow with entries for each step might be easier to read, eg https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1968954 :) 15:41 indeed, worth a look 15:41 could be complex though as this will transition differently per bug task 15:41 if a case has multiple packages affected, they will be in different states 15:43 I'll promote xdp-tools after the meeting 15:43 man, inetutils .. that's a blast from the past. oof. 15:43 indeed 15:43 ok, all in mismatches have open cases now 15:43 none forgotten 15:43 next section of the meeting 15:43 #topic New MIRs 15:44 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 15:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:44 oh wow 15:44 5 15:44 I could take the perl ones 15:44 they are usually rather mechanical, so I can better do them in between meetings 15:44 I can take 1 or 2, but it will be for next pulse (already full for this one) 15:44 some are false positives i think 15:44 looking for reviewers of nullboot and mini-iso-tools 15:44 nullboot is likely in the wrong spot in the flowchart 15:45 joalif: which ones do you tihnk are false positives? 15:45 nullboot 15:46 i had done the review of it 15:46 oh yeah that just ended in an odd state 15:46 it is acked 15:46 and not in mismatches 15:46 yes 15:47 joalif: was yours an ack as well? 15:47 reading ... 15:47 yep 15:47 yes iirc 15:47 was waiting for sec review 15:47 thanks, status updated 15:48 (it would have been good to have an update on the recommended todo though) 15:48 nullboot has security's ack 15:48 ack didrocks, I asked for it 15:49 ok in that case mini-iso-tools to grab 15:49 if this can wait early next pulse, I’m happy to grab it 15:49 maybe license-perl at lower urgency for didrocks then? 15:49 those are usually not as pushy 15:49 as you prefer :) 15:50 hehe 15:50 joalif: would you be up to have a look at the mini-iso-tools ? 15:50 sure 15:50 thanks 15:50 thereby all new cases are assigned 15:50 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 15:50 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 15:50 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:51 inetutils isn't ready yet 15:51 bug 2003549 waits for an FFE approval 15:51 other than that is mostly ready as prepared by athos 15:52 bug 2004516 waits on things and was assigned someone to work on (no action from us) 15:52 bug 1997560 also went back and is now assigne to desktop to resolve 15:52 and 2003272 is back on till 15:52 ok all in incomplete have an owner 15:53 good for now I'd think 15:53 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 15:53 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 15:53 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:53 Internal link 15:53 - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect 15:53 - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much 15:53 #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 15:53 thank you @ extended security team for all the completions recently 15:53 from my teams POV puma is the only one not yet assigned but rather urgent 15:54 I see the face of alexm on the ticket 15:54 but not "in progress" 15:54 does this fit together sarnold eslerm ? 15:54 I'm working on pcs this week and puma is assigned, should be complete with time to FFe 15:54 if puma needs extra help I can assist 15:55 puma - as you know - is the last bit of a big change 15:55 hence we'd appreaciate to not come uin much later 15:55 since we will make pacemaker switch crmsh -> pcsd 15:55 aye, unfortunately amurray is also our primary snapd contact, another high-priority and high-importance demand on our resources; it might make sense to ask eslerm to pick it up if amurray hasn't started yet 15:55 not rushing you but like until today in a week as the latest ? 15:55 ok 15:56 we can discuss with amurray when his day starts 15:56 you can internally check if there has been progress made, I'd not want to be the reason to step on each others toes 15:56 thanks sarnold 15:56 btw I had to smile on "with time to FFe" eslerm, as that would be -5 back in time from now on 15:56 yeah :/ trying to fast-context-switch stuff in progress is definintely an exhausting step :) 15:56 indeed 15:57 but time is almost up and the rest looks good 15:57 #topic Any other business? 15:57 not from me 15:57 should be doable to take puma, but need to run past my workload with aburrage 15:57 nothing from me 15:57 heh, aburrage is out all this week. :/ anyway, I'll talk with amurray in a few hours 15:57 nothing 15:57 nothing from me 15:57 none from me 15:58 being out means he won't say no :-) 15:58 thank you all! 15:58 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)