16:00 <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 16:00 <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:00:54 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 16:00 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 16:01 <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here: 16:01 <jawn-smith> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-8-december-2022/32576 16:01 <jawn-smith> Let's take our usual time to read and ask questions 16:03 <bdrung> bdmurray, can you point me to the code of apport-test? Should we add some API test cases to avoid future breakage? 16:04 <bdmurray> bdrung: https://code.launchpad.net/~daisy-pluckers/error-tracker-deployment/test-crashes 16:08 <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs 16:08 <bdrung> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~daisy-pluckers/error-tracker-deployment/test-crashes/revision/97 -> using an internal method sounds wrong to me. Recently I added a "no UI" UI object for rejecting all questions. 16:08 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:08 <jawn-smith> bug 1998095 16:09 <bdmurray> bdrung: I didn't feel great about that change 16:09 <jawn-smith> Ah yes, we wanted to ask vorlon about this 16:10 <vorlon> if you're asking me, I don't see any reason we would want to keep the older implementation 16:10 <juliank> do it 16:10 <slyon> ack 16:10 <jawn-smith> so would pkg-config get demoted? 16:10 <vorlon> the interfaces are all-in-all pretty stable and I don't have any particular attachment to the old implementation 16:10 <jawn-smith> or both in main? 16:10 <juliank> jawn-smith: remove from archive? 16:10 <jawn-smith> even better 16:10 <juliank> or demote 16:11 <vorlon> pkg-config will be a removal as soon as pkgconf is clear 16:11 <vorlon> (Debian has already removed it from unstable) 16:11 <juliank> ack 16:11 <juliank> also hooray 16:11 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:11 <jawn-smith> bug 1842439 16:11 <jawn-smith> This is the one that's been with desktop for a while 16:12 <jawn-smith> bdmurray: you mentioned a desktop sync meeting at which you could bring this up? 16:12 <juliank> no news on the bug 16:12 <bdmurray> yes 16:12 <jawn-smith> Great, thanks bdmurray 16:12 <jawn-smith> That's it for kk 16:12 <jawn-smith> light on bugs this week 16:12 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:12 <jawn-smith> bug 1965094 16:13 <jawn-smith> IIRC this is also with desktop? 16:13 <bdmurray> no that's kernel team 16:13 <jawn-smith> Still nothing to do for us? 16:14 <bdmurray> Unless julian knows how to fix it 16:14 <jawn-smith> Okay, moving on 16:14 <bdmurray> There are 1000s of crashes so I'd rather just get it sorted 16:14 <jawn-smith> oh, not moving on 16:14 <jawn-smith> juliank: do you know how to fix it? 16:14 <juliank> I haven't looked 16:15 <juliank> should be fine yeah 16:15 <bdmurray> We can move on 16:15 <jawn-smith> Okay thanks 16:15 <jawn-smith> bug 1992369 16:15 <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: you were working on this one right? 16:16 <danilogondolfo> yes, it appears to be a problem with the font build system, rebuilding the package on kinetic and lunar fixes the font 16:16 <jawn-smith> But not jammy 16:16 <jawn-smith> so we might need to SRU fontforge? 16:17 <vorlon> unrelated to the emoji font toolchain sru that just happened? 16:17 <vorlon> yeah shouldn't build-dep on that, but does b-d on fontforge 16:20 <bdmurray> It sounds like the bug is only visible when a user has a specific configuration so I don't think its worth SRU'ing 16:21 <bdmurray> Let's move on 16:21 <jawn-smith> Should we keep the tag? Or should it be removed? 16:22 <bdmurray> rls-jj-notfixing 16:22 <bdmurray> I'll do it 16:23 <juliank> bdmurray: so bug 1965094 is a dup of 1964880 and got fixed, so I remembered correctly 16:23 <jawn-smith> Great, moving on 16:23 <jawn-smith> #topic proposed-migration 16:23 <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 16:23 <jawn-smith> vorlon: 16:24 <vorlon> only 146 packages needing attention 16:24 <vorlon> so I'll try to assign 1 to everyone present and move on 16:24 <jawn-smith> oh vpa mentioned he would work on java-common 16:25 <ginggs> nothing to do for node-jquery or python3-defaults 16:25 <vorlon> ginggs: does that mean you're already solving node-jquery? not obvious to me that there's nothing to do 16:26 <vorlon> java-common: vpa<tab> 16:26 <ginggs> there's a test in the queue waiting to run 16:26 <vorlon> anything listed as 'Depends on perl' we should skip 16:26 <vorlon> ginggs: ack 16:26 <vorlon> libfilesys-df-perl: autopkgtest regression, I'll skip those as well because I'm still in the process of retrying them with necessary options 16:27 <vorlon> cryptsetup blocking vim 16:27 <vorlon> this might be fixed by vpa's work, and needs retry now? 16:27 <vorlon> jawn-smith to retry 16:27 <vorlon> cryptsetup: jawn-smith 16:28 <vorlon> jawn-smith: do you also want to look at the vim-ultisnips autopkgtest failure against vim? 16:28 <jawn-smith> Sure 16:28 <vorlon> thanks 16:28 <vorlon> apt vs postgresql-debversion, might just need --all-proposed test retry. juliank ? 16:28 <samirkamerkar> I believe vpa has looked at cryptsetup as well 16:28 <juliank> vorlon: hmm it should try all-proposed automatically shouldn't it? 16:28 <juliank> it does sometimes 16:29 <vorlon> juliank: there's a fallback on uninstallability to try to install from -proposed. Can you take it to look into? 16:30 <vorlon> jawn-smith: and then there's a run of other packages blocked by cryptsetup autopkgtests, which is almost certainly the test progression rather than a regression. Do you want to take them all? (json-c, popt, libjson-perl) 16:30 <vorlon> debianutils vs mysql-8.0: adrien can you take this? 16:30 <jawn-smith> vorlon: sure 16:30 <vorlon> expat vs pypy: bdrung ? 16:30 <vorlon> init-system-helpers: bdmurray ? 16:31 <vorlon> libffi vs pypy: dbungert ? 16:31 <dbungert> vorlon: ack for libffi vs pypy 16:31 <bdmurray> Sure I was looking at init-system-helpers yesterday 16:31 <bdrung> yes, i can look into expat and pypy 16:31 <vorlon> lv4 vs mysql-8.0 and python-lz4: danilogondolfo ? 16:32 <danilogondolfo> vorlon: ack 16:32 <vorlon> sorry, that's l*z*4 16:32 <vorlon> lz4 vs mysql-8.0 and python-lz4: danilogondolfo 16:32 <vorlon> popt vs gdisk and svox: waveform ? 16:32 <waveform> vorlon, avk 16:32 <vorlon> psycopg2 vs pg-partman: ginggs ? 16:32 <ginggs> sure 16:32 <vorlon> pycairo vs comitup: doko ? 16:33 <vorlon> python-dateutil vs cloudkitty, pcs: enr0n ? 16:33 <vorlon> and I think that gives everyone one who needs one 16:34 <vorlon> jawn-smith: fwiw a `retry-autopkgtest-regressions --all-proposed | grep '=cryptsetup%2F'`, like I talked about on the mailing list, is probably the quickest way to clear all related failures 16:34 <jawn-smith> sweet, thanks 16:35 <vorlon> and that's it for proposed-migration then 16:35 <vorlon> jawn-smith: 16:35 <jawn-smith> #topic AOB 16:35 <enr0n> vorlon: can do 16:35 <adrien> vorlon: sure 16:35 <jawn-smith> only one more of these meetings this year 16:35 <vorlon> not for me, this is my last for the year :) 16:35 <jawn-smith> Any extended absences coming up? 16:35 <jawn-smith> I'll be off tomorrow in the morning and all of Dec 16 16:35 <vorlon> I'm EOY tomorrow 16:35 <slyon> I'll be EOY on Tuesday 16:35 <bdrung> bdmurray, regarding test-crashes: Since apport commit f8edc7280d492e710218c193e53542f1f86cfa91 you can use r.add_hooks_info(apport.ui.NoninteractiveHookUI()) 16:35 <ginggs> i'm also out on december 16 16:36 <jbicha> there's also bug 1998970 for proposed-migration 16:40 <jawn-smith> #endmeeting