== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by jawn-smith, 01 Dec at 16:01 — 16:54 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-12-01-16.01.log.html == Meeting summary == * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-1-december/32562/ (jawn-smith, 16:01) === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 16:10. * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 16:10) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 16:15) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 16:16) === proposed-migration === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 16:30. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 16:30) === AOB === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 16:51. == People present (lines said) == * jawn-smith (82) * bdmurray (23) * slyon (9) * bdrung (5) * ginggs (4) * bG9s (3) * sil2100 (3) * meetingology (2) * schopin (2) * enr0n (2) * waveform_ (1) * waveform (1) * samirkamerkar (1) * dbungert (1) * adrien (1) * xypron (1) == Full log == 16:01 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 16:01 Meeting started at 16:01:16 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 16:01 o/ 16:01 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 16:01 The weekly status is here: 16:01 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-1-december/32562/ 16:01 let's take our usual time to read and ask questions 16:02 o/ 16:02 waveform_: was the Pi desktop LUKS change in livecd-rootfs or the gadget? 16:03 neither -- manually patched into the image, hence "hacky". Ultimately it ought to go in ubuntu-raspi-settings-desktop most likely 16:05 enr0n: the reboot required notification does that need SRU'ing or ... ? 16:05 bdrung: thanks for the quick turnaround on tzdata :) 16:05 bdmurray: eventually. It's not even in lunar yet. This was just a PPA for the time being 16:05 schopin, you're welcome 16:05 ack 16:06 please tell me something big could be done for "lunar year" and "lunar calendar" 16:06 ok I'm quiet again 16:06 Is tzdata verified so we can release it early? 16:07 the first uploads are verified, but the second uploads (for updating ICU data) are pending being accepted 16:08 bleah xnox 16:08 wait, sil2100 accepted them. I need to do the tests again. 16:09 let me know when the testing is done 16:09 They're in flight 16:09 I want them to land 16:09 Still need to accept focal 16:09 Not be up in the air 16:10 #topic Release incoming bugs 16:10 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:10 bug 1396379 16:12 This appears to be in progress thanks to juliank 16:12 So let's remove the tag 16:12 bug 1998095 16:14 the question here is foundations will be maintaining pkgconf 16:14 Since we currently maintain pkg-config the answer is probably yes 16:14 But we need to have a more in depth discussion with v_orlon 16:15 So let's leave it tagged and discuss it when v_orlon is back around 16:15 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:15 just bug 1842439 16:15 which is currently with the desktop team, so nothing to do 16:16 No updates to the bug since Nov 5 so moving on 16:16 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 16:16 bug 1965094 is still with the desktop team 16:16 No updates since October 16:16 we should follow up with the desktop team about bug 1842439 right? 16:17 bdmurray: would you like to follow up on that? 16:17 yes 16:18 thanks 16:18 bug 1997467 16:18 slyon: it's netplan and you tagged it 16:18 looks like there's a PR? 16:18 Indeed 16:18 but the SRU still needs to be done, correct? 16:18 I got my initial fix reviewed by schopin, but it looks like the solution will be much more complex 16:18 I hope to allocate some time to work on this next week 16:18 Okay so if you're actively working on it next week should we remove the tag? 16:18 I think we can remove the rls-incoming tag, as I've also tagged it foundations-todo 16:19 Still needs an proper upstream fix and SRUs 16:19 yes, I'll remove the tag 16:19 Thanks 16:19 bug 1992369 16:20 bdmurray: you tagged this in a comment where you stated that you were unable to recreate? 16:21 yeah, that's weird hunh 16:23 somebody should have a look at comment #8 and if there isn't anything obvious pass on it 16:23 i.e. fontforge etc... 16:23 Okay, who would like to do that? 16:24 sounds like danilogondolfo will do so 16:24 bug 1991533 16:24 Looks like it's fix committed. But I'm assuming the tag is here for the SRUs? 16:26 It looks like something I should "carry over the finish line" 16:26 Great thanks bdmurray 16:26 That's all of the bugs 16:30 #topic proposed-migration 16:30 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 16:30 I retried glibc and linux-meta-raspi 16:31 ginggs: is retrying binutils 16:31 schopin is investigating cargo 16:31 and systemd with linux-meta-raspi 16:32 looks like postgresql-common just needs a migration-reference/0 test 16:32 I'll start that 16:32 pkg-js-tools looks a bit flakey 16:33 debhelper's waiting on seem a bit unbelievable 16:33 why do you say that? 16:34 because the ppc64el queue is close to 0 16:34 and its been waiting 29 days 16:34 i retried debhelper 16:34 Thanks ginggs 16:34 cheers 16:34 it was one of the ones where the tests were not in the queue 16:34 I did a migration-reference/0 test for one of them because the history showed a long list of failures 16:35 so is the solution to that to manually queue them? 16:35 Or should we leave them in that state so QA or IS can look into how we got in this state? 16:36 Sounds like we should just retrigger them 16:36 Its unlikely the QA team will have time to investigate waiting ones 16:36 Any volunteers to retrigger those? 16:37 which ones specifically? 16:37 jawn-smith: which are those? 16:37 the debhelper waiting ones 16:37 jawn-smith: i already did them 16:37 ginggs: already did 16:37 Oh great, thanks 16:37 dbus 16:37 sounds like a waveform thing 16:38 I'll look at fwupd vs python3-defaults 16:38 ack, I'll take dbus 16:38 Any volunteers to look at nemo vs libselinux and network-manager vs libselinux? 16:39 Ah this appears to be a dbus thing 16:41 any volunteers for cross-toolchain-base? 16:42 mwhudson: I heard you say yes to cross-toolchain-base 16:42 sil2100: livecd-rootfs? 16:42 at least the ppc64el one 16:43 ...ok! 16:43 distro-info missing builds 16:43 distro-info is on my radar. 16:43 ack, thanks 16:43 cmake 16:43 who wants it? 16:43 distro-info fails to build due to pylint behaving weird. 16:44 ogayot: cmake 16:44 samirkamerkar: can you look into the java-common regressions that aren't arm{64,hf} ? 16:45 why not armhf? 16:45 oh didn't realize those queues were reasonable 16:45 so just the not-arm64 ones 16:45 I may need help, but I will give it a try 16:46 openssh needs retries 16:46 juliank: apt ? 16:47 adrien: libb-hooks-op-check-entersubforcv-perl 16:47 dbungert: libb-hooks-parser-perl 16:47 ack 16:48 danilogondolfo: libbencode-perl 16:48 schopin: libdevel-declare-perl 16:48 ack 16:48 that name 16:49 Someone should ping vpa later about libsignatures-perl 16:49 cyrus-imapd may just need migration-reference tests 16:49 I can do that 16:50 libical3 causes regression in gvmd -> xypron 16:50 xypron: ciderwebmail vs libemail-address-xs-perl ? 16:50 sure let's give ciderwebmail to enr0n then 16:50 ack 16:51 #topic AOB 16:54 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)