16:01 <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
16:01 <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:01:20 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
16:01 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
16:01 <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here:
16:01 <jawn-smith> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-10-november-2022/32153
16:02 <jawn-smith> Let's all take our usual few minutes to read and ask questions
16:03 <jawn-smith> waveform: Are you on the DMB calendar yet?
16:03 <waveform> I believe so, added myself at some point this week
16:03 <jawn-smith> Yep I see you
16:06 <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
16:07 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:07 <jawn-smith> Just one
16:07 <jawn-smith> bug 1842439
16:07 <jawn-smith> Which is a purple link for me, so we must have discussed this already
16:09 <bdrung> I talked to the desktop team last week and robert-ancell developed a patch, but that is not enough. So still waiting for the desktop team.
16:09 <jawn-smith> Okay thanks, moving on then
16:09 <jawn-smith> https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:09 <jawn-smith> bug 1965094
16:10 <jawn-smith> This one also appears to be with desktop
16:10 <jawn-smith> bug 1993037
16:13 <jawn-smith> Asking for more information in the bug report
16:13 <jawn-smith> That's it for rls incoming bugs
16:14 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-triage-discuss-bug-tasks.html
16:15 <jawn-smith> Lots of discussion about our bug triage process
16:16 <jawn-smith> bug 1993318
16:18 <jawn-smith> We disabled this in the kinetic ISOs
16:18 <jawn-smith> ZFS + encryption is no longer an install option
16:19 <jawn-smith> so marking invalid and removing the tag
16:19 <enr0n> I'll mark invalid for systemd and remove the tag
16:19 <jawn-smith> bug 1968109
16:20 <jawn-smith> juliank: you tagged this one
16:20 <jawn-smith> My opinion is that this sounds like an issue for the flavors
16:21 <jawn-smith> Removing the tags
16:22 <jawn-smith> bug 1983522
16:22 <jawn-smith> This seems like it would come up in proposed migration
16:23 * jawn-smith checks the proposed migration report
16:23 <bdrung> IMO we should put this ticket on our queue (tag foundations-todo)
16:23 <jawn-smith> Yes cryptsetup is in the proposed migration report
16:23 <jawn-smith> Sounds good to me, bdrung do you mind doing that?
16:24 <bdrung> Yes, I'll tag it
16:24 <jawn-smith> skipping the rustc one as our rustc person is on holiday
16:24 <jawn-smith> bug 1579457
16:25 <juliank> jftr: (queue ~ subscribe foundations-bugs, foundations-todo ~ selected for development)
16:27 <adrien> doesn't sharing swap between OS means you could boot into another OS with the same swap?
16:29 <dbungert> I'll add some comments to the bug
16:30 <jawn-smith> bug 1981103
16:31 <jawn-smith> slyon to update the bug
16:31 <slyon> ifupdown is in universe, so we should remove the tag and ask for a patch
16:31 <jawn-smith> bug 1988018
16:31 <jawn-smith> Waiting on the openstack team
16:32 <jawn-smith> so removing the discuss tag
16:32 <jawn-smith> bug 1988423
16:33 <jawn-smith> Brian tagged this and he's not here, so let's discuss this one later
16:34 <jawn-smith> bug 1994165
16:34 <jawn-smith> adrien: Do you think this is worth an SRU?
16:35 <jawn-smith> This should be fixed in lunar by merging/syncing openssl from Debian
16:35 <jawn-smith> but is a patch worth SRU-ing to kinetic/jammy? Not sure the importance here
16:36 <jawn-smith> adrien to have a look at this bug and update the bug report at that time
16:37 <jawn-smith> Plenty more bugs in the list, but with 15 minutes left in the meeting let's pivot to proposed-migration
16:37 <jawn-smith> #topic proposed-migration
16:37 <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
16:37 <adrien> there's maybe more discussion in the openssl bug report about the CLA than the actual issue :P
16:39 <jawn-smith> Many of these regressions are on a single arch, so should just be retried
16:39 <jawn-smith> However, we're not going to retrigger a bunch of tests right now as the queues are still hefty from archive opening
16:39 * jawn-smith looks for regressions on multiple arches to hand out
16:39 <bdrung> some package (e.g. apport) failed with badpkg
16:40 <jawn-smith> apport has a regression on multiple arches
16:40 <jawn-smith> bdrung: can you look into this badpkg issue?
16:42 <jawn-smith> cmake has failures on multiple arches
16:42 <jawn-smith> any volunteers for cmake?
16:43 <jawn-smith> ogayot: cmake?
16:43 <jawn-smith> Thanks
16:43 <ogayot> ack
16:44 <jawn-smith> dbus will be handled by a merge from waveform
16:44 <jawn-smith> so skipping those
16:44 <jawn-smith> distro-info
16:44 <waveform> ack
16:44 <jawn-smith> Anyone want it?
16:44 <enr0n> Isn't that bdrung's package?
16:44 <bdrung> regarding badpkg for apport: dbus-x11 1.14.0-2ubuntu2 cannot go with libdbus-1-3 (= 1.14.0-2ubuntu3)
16:45 <jawn-smith> waveform: distro-info
16:46 <jawn-smith> libselinux has a few failures on multiple architectures
16:46 <waveform> ack again :)
16:46 <jawn-smith> ignoring dbus
16:47 <jawn-smith> glib2.0 vs libselinux, any takers?
16:47 <jawn-smith> Oh that's the dbus issue
16:48 <jawn-smith> I'll take nemo vs libselinux
16:48 <slyon> it seems to be the same dbus-x11 failure for glib
16:48 <jawn-smith> how about network-manager vs libselinux?
16:48 <jawn-smith> Any takers?
16:49 <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: network-manager vs libselinux with support from another team member
16:49 <bdrung> The sbuild autopkgtest fails because debootstrap did not know lunar yet. So retriggering the test.
16:50 <jawn-smith> Okay, we're running short on time. Let's let the queues settle for now and move to AOB
16:50 <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
16:50 <jawn-smith> Tomorrow is a US holiday
16:51 <ogayot> also a holiday in France
16:51 <enr0n> I will be out Monday also
16:53 <slyon> danilogondolfo: actually the libselinux vs networkmanager seems to be related to dbus-x11 badpkg as well...
16:54 <jawn-smith> #endmeeting