15:01 <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
15:01 <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:01:53 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
15:01 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
15:02 <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here:
15:02 <jawn-smith> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-06-october-2022/31073
15:02 <jawn-smith> Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions
15:02 <ginggs> o/
15:02 <schopin> Please forgive the lack of my status, it was either that or triage, I figured triage was more important.
15:08 * juliank is at MS Berlin, https://twitter.com/brau_ner/status/1577724706618474496
15:08 <jawn-smith> Alright any other questions?
15:09 <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
15:09 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
15:09 <jawn-smith> 3 of these today
15:10 <jawn-smith> bug 1842439
15:10 <bdrung> This is the one for the desktop team
15:11 <jawn-smith> Okay nothing for foundations to do then
15:12 <jawn-smith> bug 1990887
15:12 <jawn-smith> Also seems to be a desktop team bug
15:13 <jawn-smith> bug 1795278
15:13 <vorlon> should probably be rls-kk-notfixing as Desktop Team isn't responsible for the KDE ubiquity UX
15:13 <vorlon> ... for both of those bugs, apparently!
15:14 <mclemenceau> o/
15:14 <jawn-smith> This last one also appears to be a desktop issue
15:14 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
15:14 <jawn-smith> bug 1965094
15:16 <jawn-smith> Yet another desktop bug
15:16 <jawn-smith> That's it for rls incoming bugs
15:16 <vorlon> pff, these buggy desktops, with their software
15:16 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-triage-discuss-bug-tasks.html
15:17 <jawn-smith> I've sorted by order of importance and I'm going to see how many we can get through
15:17 <jawn-smith> bug 1977630
15:17 <jawn-smith> schopin: you tagged this, what did you want to discuss?
15:18 <enr0n> ddstreet provided a PR for this, so I will review and test it
15:18 <schopin> I wanted to know if we would fold it in an upcoming SRU or not
15:18 <vorlon> so no discussion, just foundations-todo it?
15:19 <jawn-smith> Yes, that seems appropriate
15:19 <jawn-smith> bug 1991404
15:20 <jawn-smith> vorlon: you tagged this, what would you like to discuss?
15:21 <jawn-smith> Sounds like there was a misunderstanding, we're going to mark it as triaged and foundations-todo it
15:21 <jawn-smith> bug 1579457
15:22 <jawn-smith> I tagged this one
15:22 <jawn-smith> It appears to be a real bug
15:22 <jawn-smith> but I wanted to discuss the importance of it
15:22 <jawn-smith> Any opinions?
15:23 <vorlon> I think medium is reasonable
15:24 <jawn-smith> Should we mark it todo?
15:24 <vorlon> realistically, this is a long-standing behavior and it's in ubiquity which we should not be investing in
15:25 <jawn-smith> Okay, so what should we do with the tags?
15:25 <vorlon> what's the set of tags that means "we've looked at it and declined it"?
15:25 <jawn-smith> foundations-todon't
15:25 <vorlon> rls-kk-notfixing?
15:27 <vorlon> sounds like we don't currently have a workflow that captures this
15:27 <vorlon> so it might be a good idea for someone to capture this in our triage doc
15:27 <jawn-smith> Agreed, let's touch base on that later
15:27 <jawn-smith> bug 1892369
15:27 <jawn-smith> waveform: you tagged this. What would you like to discuss?
15:31 <jawn-smith> We have agreed to mark this medium and make sure the subiquity folks look at it
15:31 <vorlon> sounds like foundations-bugs should be subscribed too, but not foundations-todo?
15:31 <dbungert> ack
15:32 <jawn-smith> bug 1920753
15:33 <vorlon> did I tag this one for discussion?
15:33 <jawn-smith> No bdrung did
15:33 <vorlon> we had some discussion about this internally, I know
15:35 <vorlon> bdrung's question was "is this a phased-updates bug" and the answer is no
15:35 <jawn-smith> Okay so if it's not a phased-updates issue and it's importance is Low
15:35 <jawn-smith> should we just remove the discuss tag and move on?
15:35 <bdrung> yes
15:35 <vorlon> I think there's nothing further to discuss ? It's been further triaged and we're waiting to see if there's any other feedback from the submitter that would tell us this is an installer bug
15:36 <jawn-smith> bug 1990856
15:36 <jawn-smith> enr0n: You tagged this
15:36 <enr0n> jawn-smith: looking
15:37 <enr0n> Oh, a patch was provided so I thought someone who knows the package should take a look
15:37 <jawn-smith> Who knows debootstrap?
15:38 <vorlon> can we forward this to Debian rather than diverging here?
15:38 * bdrung agrees
15:38 <jawn-smith> Okay great, bdrung can you do that?
15:39 <bdrung> yes
15:39 <jawn-smith> Thanks!
15:39 <jawn-smith> bug 1700814
15:39 <vorlon> it's a valid bug but it also affects Debian, is not super high priority for us
15:39 <jawn-smith> dbungert: You tagged this
15:40 <dbungert> upstream seems to have made a decision here, I'm reluctant to revert that but wanted to see if others had a strong opinion
15:41 <dbungert> lacking that I think we should consider this foundations notfixing
15:41 <vorlon> I agree
15:41 <dbungert> ok, I will update the bug
15:41 <jawn-smith> Thanks!
15:42 <jawn-smith> bug 1968334
15:43 <jawn-smith> The CVE is still present in focal
15:44 <vorlon> this is a case of a universe package that we are expecting to maintain in the future for future releases (in-progress MIR)
15:44 <vorlon> it's not-for-us wrt the existing series
15:44 <vorlon> is it still open in kinetic? the bug state doesn't show it as fixed
15:44 <schopin> agreed
15:49 <ginggs> https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2019-13115
15:51 <jawn-smith> Okay we're getting close to the top of the hour
15:51 <schopin> I opened Focal and Bionic as New and marked the overall as Fix Released.
15:51 <jawn-smith> Excellent, thanks!
15:52 <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
15:52 <jawn-smith> Monday is a US holiday
15:52 <jawn-smith> I'll be out most of next week (working Tuesday and half of Wednesday)
15:52 <jawn-smith> Any volunteers to run this meeting next week?
15:53 <bdrung> I will be off next Thurstday and Friday.
15:55 <jawn-smith> #endmeeting