== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by jawn-smith, 30 Jun at 15:00 — 15:57 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-30-15.00.log.html == Meeting summary == === Lightning Round === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 15:00. === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 15:11. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 15:11) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 15:21) === Team proposed-migration report === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 15:28. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (jawn-smith, 15:28) * ''LINK:'' https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytest shows a lot of regressions (bdrung, 15:42) === AOB === Discussion started by jawn-smith at 15:42. * ''LINK:'' https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity?h=master => tags and jammy branch are missing. (xnox, 15:50) == People present (lines said) == * jawn-smith (90) * xnox (15) * slyon (14) * schopin (11) * ginggs (7) * doko (6) * ubottu (5) * bdrung (5) * ogayot (4) * enr0n (3) * waveform (3) * meetingology (2) * sil2100 (2) * mclemenceau (2) * juliank (1) == Full log == 15:00 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:00 Meeting started at 15:00:41 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:00 o/ 15:00 o/ 15:00 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:00 #topic Lightning Round 15:01 The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-30-june-2022/29123/10 15:01 Let's all take a few minutes to read and ask questions 15:01 sil2100: It says you reviewed the --until/--thru PR 15:01 should I merge it? 15:02 Aaaah, didn't press the button 15:02 jawn-smith: i saw your libdigidoc fix, that package is orphaned in debian (QA maintained). if you're interested in getting an upload into debian, i'd be happy to sponsor 15:02 jawn-smith: done now o/ 15:03 ginggs, sil2100 thanks! I did submittodebian the patch I created 15:03 libdigidoc? Isn't that obsoleted upstream too? 15:03 should it be removed from Debian/Ubuntu then? 15:04 I'd be all for it, but that's mostly because I get spammed any time someone clicks the rebuild button on LP as I'm TIL 15:04 well, now I'm TIL :) 15:04 \o/ 15:05 No reverse dependencies... 15:05 o/ 15:05 Okay I'll investigate filing a removal bug as part of my +1 shift this week 15:06 Have a look at my initial RM bug, there should be some pointers there. 15:06 libdigidoc-tools might still be useful 15:07 I'll have a look this afternoon 15:07 and ping ginggs if we decide it should stay, then we can remove the diff from Debian 15:07 Any other questions? 15:08 enr0n: I didn't receive this oomd email, is it stuck in moderation? 15:08 slyon: oof, possibly, let me check the list archive 15:09 This one I think: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-June/042159.html 15:10 The missing email has been found 15:10 thx, it went through after all :) 15:10 Any other questions? 15:11 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:11 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:11 bug 1980348 15:11 Bug 1980348 in gcc-12 (Ubuntu) "gcc ftbfs in kinetic (crypt.h not found in 32bit libsanitizer build)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980348 15:12 gcc is kinda important 15:12 I figured that out an hour ago 15:12 just closing 15:12 oh excellent 15:12 Thanks! 15:12 Are you closing for both gcc-10 and gcc-12? 15:14 Sounds like it's still building for both, so we'll discuss it next week if it comes back 15:14 bug 1980195 15:14 Bug 1980195 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu desktop (canary) ISO & apport-collect, ubuntu-bug fail to run" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980195 15:14 Looks like a potential dependency/import issue? 15:14 bdrung: Do you have an opinion? 15:15 jawn-smith, that was a regression in apport, but already fixed with the latest kinetic version 15:16 Excellent, thanks. Can you close the LP bug please? 15:16 i'll do the paperwork and close it 15:16 Thanks! 15:16 could we have a look at LP: #1979297 and see if it's something we want carded please? 15:16 Launchpad bug 1979297 in pyopencl (Ubuntu) "pyopencl: please RM riscv64 binaries" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979297 15:17 xypron: Thoughts on carding this? 15:21 We've agreed to let the removal go ahead, and therefore this does not need a card 15:21 That's it for kk 15:21 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:21 bug 1979951 15:21 Bug 1979951 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "127.0.0.1/::1 removed from loopback interface if you configure extra IPs on lo (r104 regression/behaviour change)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979951 15:21 I tagged that one 15:21 Is filed against both netplan.io and systemd 15:22 it's a regression, probably introduced by netplan switching to the "networkctl reload" command (instead of hard restart of sd-networkd) 15:22 I think we should double check the situation on NetworkManager vs sd-networkd backends 15:22 Based on your last comment it seems this should be fixed in systemd, not netplan.io? Or do both need work? 15:22 and then probably apply the upstream fix to systemd that's mentioned in the bug 15:22 most probably systemd only 15:22 so +1 for carding it 15:22 enr0n: Do you have the bandwidth to look into this? 15:23 jawn-smith: Yeah I should now 15:23 Okay so let's card it since someone has bandwidth to look into it. mclemenceau do you mind doing the carding? 15:24 Ok 15:24 Do we want proper lo support in netplan, too? It does seem kinda hacky to use the ethernet type for it? 15:24 schopin: we have a feature-request/bug report about "dummy" devices, which would be a better match for loopback 15:24 we'll get to that eventually 15:25 it would help with default resolved configs of dns too. 15:25 nice, thanks :) 15:25 (to set that on lo) 15:25 Okay excellent. It will be carded and the priority can be figured out in the future 15:25 bug 1978125 15:25 Bug 1978125 in apt (Ubuntu Jammy) "apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978125 15:25 we discussed this last week but I don't remember where we landed 15:25 * jawn-smith reads logs 15:25 carded already 15:26 Okay so let's just remove the tag from the LP bug 15:26 I'll do that real quick 15:26 in iproute2, dummy and loopback type both exist 15:26 tag removed 15:27 rls-ii is empty 15:27 rls-ff only has the 127.0.0.1 bug 15:28 #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:28 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:28 no v_orlon today so I'll do this 15:28 ubuntu-meta is still with desktop 15:29 we should probably ignore the systemd failures, as we've uploaded v251 today and all systemd related tests are currently re-run 15:29 python3-stdlib-extensions was with doko I believe 15:29 Any updates? 15:30 slyon: ack, thanks. Will ignore systemd 15:31 doko will look at python-bayespy and bdrung will look at apport. Thanks! 15:31 usb-creator is waiting on an MIR 15:31 mutt is also waiting on an MIR (which is waiting on security) 15:31 systemd, skip 15:31 is anybody working on these MIRs? 15:31 i think python-bayespy just needs a retry with the new version 15:32 doko: yes, those are in progress 15:32 ta 15:32 doko: Yes, at least the two mutt related MIRs are waiting on security review 15:33 alexghiti is the one driving them from our side 15:33 openssl 15:33 on it 15:33 schopin: hooray, thanks 15:33 llvm-toolchain-14 15:34 missing builds are for the same reason as gcc, I believe. 15:34 Excellent. Does i386 need to be re-triggered? 15:35 jawn-smith: do it! 15:35 done! 15:35 and the autopkg test failure is a kill -9 15:35 the autopkgtests for this fenics-dofinx package look flakey 15:36 so try on a machine with more memory? 15:36 there was a sigkill in the test suite, oom? 15:36 Does it need to be added to big-packages? 15:36 Anyone want to volunteer to look into that? 15:36 i'll have a look at fenics-dofinx and add it to big_packages 15:37 thanks! 15:37 now, that I can :) 15:37 moving on 15:37 lintian appears to need MIR investigation 15:37 yay! new lintian depends. they're being introduced faster than we can process them :) 15:37 or possibly just binary package demotion if we're lucky? 15:37 I'll do the initial investigation for lintian 15:37 slyon: thanks! 15:38 apport is with bdrung 15:38 python-httplib2. One of those is apport and therefore already covered 15:38 then python-httplib2 itself has an armhf regression 15:38 I think the python-httplib2 vs apport needs a retry 15:38 anyone here an expert in both python and the armhf architecture....? 15:39 erm... 15:39 waveform: do you have bandwidth to look at that test? 15:39 yeah, I'll take that one 15:39 E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cryptography' 15:39 Thanks! 15:40 well that should be an easy fix 15:40 moving on, curl is missing builds on quite a few architectures 15:40 I'll take that one 15:40 don't jinx it... 15:40 pygments 15:41 has an excuses bug already 15:41 waiting on a new version of pytest 15:42 so we can ignore that for now 15:42 everything else is 0 days old so that's it for proposed migration 15:42 https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytest shows a lot of regressions 15:42 #topic AOB 15:43 Monday is a US holiday 15:43 * xnox 0/ 15:44 a few ubiquity uploads to jammy & kinetic are missing from lp:ubiquity. Does anybody want to push their git tags / uploads? or should i synthesize those? 15:44 i.e. uploads from bdrung bdmurray and external person. 15:46 the commits are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/master 15:49 bdrung: and tags? git push --tags 15:49 22.10.3 15:49 22.04.16 15:49 22.04.15 15:50 https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity?h=master => tags and jammy branch are missing. 15:50 i can tag 22.04.16 and push it to jammy branch, if that's what we are ok with. 15:51 but want to check if something unexpected happened. 15:51 also tsimonq2 upload is nowhere to be seen in git 15:51 it's probably fine to add the missing tags (after checking that this tag actually is identical to the uploaded dsc) 15:52 also http://launchpadlibrarian.net/607553669/ubiquity_22.10.2_22.10.3.diff.gz chagnes the icon, which is not documented, and not expected? 15:53 i'll query that separately. 15:57 This conversation seems to be resolved, so 15:57 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)