15:00 <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:00 <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:41 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:00 <ogayot> o/ 15:00 <juliank> o/ 15:00 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:00 <jawn-smith> #topic Lightning Round 15:01 <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-30-june-2022/29123/10 15:01 <jawn-smith> Let's all take a few minutes to read and ask questions 15:01 <jawn-smith> sil2100: It says you reviewed the --until/--thru PR 15:01 <jawn-smith> should I merge it? 15:02 <sil2100> Aaaah, didn't press the button 15:02 <ginggs> jawn-smith: i saw your libdigidoc fix, that package is orphaned in debian (QA maintained). if you're interested in getting an upload into debian, i'd be happy to sponsor 15:02 <sil2100> jawn-smith: done now o/ 15:03 <jawn-smith> ginggs, sil2100 thanks! I did submittodebian the patch I created 15:03 <schopin> libdigidoc? Isn't that obsoleted upstream too? 15:03 <jawn-smith> should it be removed from Debian/Ubuntu then? 15:04 <schopin> I'd be all for it, but that's mostly because I get spammed any time someone clicks the rebuild button on LP as I'm TIL 15:04 <jawn-smith> well, now I'm TIL :) 15:04 <schopin> \o/ 15:05 <jawn-smith> No reverse dependencies... 15:05 <mclemenceau> o/ 15:05 <jawn-smith> Okay I'll investigate filing a removal bug as part of my +1 shift this week 15:06 <schopin> Have a look at my initial RM bug, there should be some pointers there. 15:06 <ginggs> libdigidoc-tools might still be useful 15:07 <jawn-smith> I'll have a look this afternoon 15:07 <jawn-smith> and ping ginggs if we decide it should stay, then we can remove the diff from Debian 15:07 <jawn-smith> Any other questions? 15:08 <slyon> enr0n: I didn't receive this oomd email, is it stuck in moderation? 15:08 <enr0n> slyon: oof, possibly, let me check the list archive 15:09 <enr0n> This one I think: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-June/042159.html 15:10 <jawn-smith> The missing email has been found 15:10 <slyon> thx, it went through after all :) 15:10 <jawn-smith> Any other questions? 15:11 <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs 15:11 <jawn-smith> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:11 <jawn-smith> bug 1980348 15:11 <ubottu> Bug 1980348 in gcc-12 (Ubuntu) "gcc ftbfs in kinetic (crypt.h not found in 32bit libsanitizer build)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980348 15:12 <jawn-smith> gcc is kinda important 15:12 <doko> I figured that out an hour ago 15:12 <doko> just closing 15:12 <jawn-smith> oh excellent 15:12 <jawn-smith> Thanks! 15:12 <jawn-smith> Are you closing for both gcc-10 and gcc-12? 15:14 <jawn-smith> Sounds like it's still building for both, so we'll discuss it next week if it comes back 15:14 <jawn-smith> bug 1980195 15:14 <ubottu> Bug 1980195 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu desktop (canary) ISO & apport-collect, ubuntu-bug fail to run" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980195 15:14 <jawn-smith> Looks like a potential dependency/import issue? 15:14 <jawn-smith> bdrung: Do you have an opinion? 15:15 <bdrung> jawn-smith, that was a regression in apport, but already fixed with the latest kinetic version 15:16 <jawn-smith> Excellent, thanks. Can you close the LP bug please? 15:16 <bdrung> i'll do the paperwork and close it 15:16 <jawn-smith> Thanks! 15:16 <ginggs> could we have a look at LP: #1979297 and see if it's something we want carded please? 15:16 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1979297 in pyopencl (Ubuntu) "pyopencl: please RM riscv64 binaries" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979297 15:17 <jawn-smith> xypron: Thoughts on carding this? 15:21 <jawn-smith> We've agreed to let the removal go ahead, and therefore this does not need a card 15:21 <jawn-smith> That's it for kk 15:21 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:21 <jawn-smith> bug 1979951 15:21 <ubottu> Bug 1979951 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "127.0.0.1/::1 removed from loopback interface if you configure extra IPs on lo (r104 regression/behaviour change)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979951 15:21 <slyon> I tagged that one 15:21 <jawn-smith> Is filed against both netplan.io and systemd 15:22 <slyon> it's a regression, probably introduced by netplan switching to the "networkctl reload" command (instead of hard restart of sd-networkd) 15:22 <slyon> I think we should double check the situation on NetworkManager vs sd-networkd backends 15:22 <jawn-smith> Based on your last comment it seems this should be fixed in systemd, not netplan.io? Or do both need work? 15:22 <slyon> and then probably apply the upstream fix to systemd that's mentioned in the bug 15:22 <slyon> most probably systemd only 15:22 <slyon> so +1 for carding it 15:22 <jawn-smith> enr0n: Do you have the bandwidth to look into this? 15:23 <enr0n> jawn-smith: Yeah I should now 15:23 <jawn-smith> Okay so let's card it since someone has bandwidth to look into it. mclemenceau do you mind doing the carding? 15:24 <mclemenceau> Ok 15:24 <schopin> Do we want proper lo support in netplan, too? It does seem kinda hacky to use the ethernet type for it? 15:24 <slyon> schopin: we have a feature-request/bug report about "dummy" devices, which would be a better match for loopback 15:24 <slyon> we'll get to that eventually 15:25 <xnox> it would help with default resolved configs of dns too. 15:25 <schopin> nice, thanks :) 15:25 <xnox> (to set that on lo) 15:25 <jawn-smith> Okay excellent. It will be carded and the priority can be figured out in the future 15:25 <jawn-smith> bug 1978125 15:25 <ubottu> Bug 1978125 in apt (Ubuntu Jammy) "apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978125 15:25 <jawn-smith> we discussed this last week but I don't remember where we landed 15:25 * jawn-smith reads logs 15:25 <schopin> carded already 15:26 <jawn-smith> Okay so let's just remove the tag from the LP bug 15:26 <jawn-smith> I'll do that real quick 15:26 <ogayot> in iproute2, dummy and loopback type both exist 15:26 <jawn-smith> tag removed 15:27 <jawn-smith> rls-ii is empty 15:27 <jawn-smith> rls-ff only has the 127.0.0.1 bug 15:28 <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:28 <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:28 <jawn-smith> no v_orlon today so I'll do this 15:28 <jawn-smith> ubuntu-meta is still with desktop 15:29 <slyon> we should probably ignore the systemd failures, as we've uploaded v251 today and all systemd related tests are currently re-run 15:29 <jawn-smith> python3-stdlib-extensions was with doko I believe 15:29 <jawn-smith> Any updates? 15:30 <jawn-smith> slyon: ack, thanks. Will ignore systemd 15:31 <jawn-smith> doko will look at python-bayespy and bdrung will look at apport. Thanks! 15:31 <jawn-smith> usb-creator is waiting on an MIR 15:31 <jawn-smith> mutt is also waiting on an MIR (which is waiting on security) 15:31 <jawn-smith> systemd, skip 15:31 <doko> is anybody working on these MIRs? 15:31 <ginggs> i think python-bayespy just needs a retry with the new version 15:32 <slyon> doko: yes, those are in progress 15:32 <doko> ta 15:32 <jawn-smith> doko: Yes, at least the two mutt related MIRs are waiting on security review 15:33 <schopin> alexghiti is the one driving them from our side 15:33 <jawn-smith> openssl 15:33 <schopin> on it 15:33 <jawn-smith> schopin: hooray, thanks 15:33 <jawn-smith> llvm-toolchain-14 15:34 <schopin> missing builds are for the same reason as gcc, I believe. 15:34 <jawn-smith> Excellent. Does i386 need to be re-triggered? 15:35 <ginggs> jawn-smith: do it! 15:35 <jawn-smith> done! 15:35 <doko> and the autopkg test failure is a kill -9 15:35 <jawn-smith> the autopkgtests for this fenics-dofinx package look flakey 15:36 <doko> so try on a machine with more memory? 15:36 <schopin> there was a sigkill in the test suite, oom? 15:36 <jawn-smith> Does it need to be added to big-packages? 15:36 <jawn-smith> Anyone want to volunteer to look into that? 15:36 <ginggs> i'll have a look at fenics-dofinx and add it to big_packages 15:37 <jawn-smith> thanks! 15:37 <ginggs> now, that I can :) 15:37 <jawn-smith> moving on 15:37 <jawn-smith> lintian appears to need MIR investigation 15:37 <slyon> yay! new lintian depends. they're being introduced faster than we can process them :) 15:37 <jawn-smith> or possibly just binary package demotion if we're lucky? 15:37 <slyon> I'll do the initial investigation for lintian 15:37 <jawn-smith> slyon: thanks! 15:38 <jawn-smith> apport is with bdrung 15:38 <jawn-smith> python-httplib2. One of those is apport and therefore already covered 15:38 <jawn-smith> then python-httplib2 itself has an armhf regression 15:38 <ogayot> I think the python-httplib2 vs apport needs a retry 15:38 <jawn-smith> anyone here an expert in both python and the armhf architecture....? 15:39 <waveform> erm... 15:39 <jawn-smith> waveform: do you have bandwidth to look at that test? 15:39 <waveform> yeah, I'll take that one 15:39 <ogayot> E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cryptography' 15:39 <jawn-smith> Thanks! 15:40 <jawn-smith> well that should be an easy fix 15:40 <jawn-smith> moving on, curl is missing builds on quite a few architectures 15:40 <jawn-smith> I'll take that one 15:40 <waveform> don't jinx it... 15:40 <jawn-smith> pygments 15:41 <jawn-smith> has an excuses bug already 15:41 <jawn-smith> waiting on a new version of pytest 15:42 <jawn-smith> so we can ignore that for now 15:42 <jawn-smith> everything else is 0 days old so that's it for proposed migration 15:42 <bdrung> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytest shows a lot of regressions 15:42 <jawn-smith> #topic AOB 15:43 <jawn-smith> Monday is a US holiday 15:43 * xnox 0/ 15:44 <xnox> a few ubiquity uploads to jammy & kinetic are missing from lp:ubiquity. Does anybody want to push their git tags / uploads? or should i synthesize those? 15:44 <xnox> i.e. uploads from bdrung bdmurray and external person. 15:46 <bdrung> the commits are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/master 15:49 <xnox> bdrung: and tags? git push --tags 15:49 <xnox> 22.10.3 15:49 <xnox> 22.04.16 15:49 <xnox> 22.04.15 15:50 <xnox> https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity?h=master => tags and jammy branch are missing. 15:50 <xnox> i can tag 22.04.16 and push it to jammy branch, if that's what we are ok with. 15:51 <xnox> but want to check if something unexpected happened. 15:51 <xnox> also tsimonq2 upload is nowhere to be seen in git 15:51 <bdrung> it's probably fine to add the missing tags (after checking that this tag actually is identical to the uploaded dsc) 15:52 <xnox> also http://launchpadlibrarian.net/607553669/ubiquity_22.10.2_22.10.3.diff.gz chagnes the icon, which is not documented, and not expected? 15:53 <xnox> i'll query that separately. 15:57 <jawn-smith> This conversation seems to be resolved, so 15:57 <jawn-smith> #endmeeting