== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by slyon, 10 May at 14:31 — 14:50 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-05-10-14.31.log.html == Meeting summary == === Review of previous action items === Discussion started by slyon at 14:31. === current component mismatches === Discussion started by slyon at 14:32. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (slyon, 14:33) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (slyon, 14:33) === New MIRs === Discussion started by slyon at 14:41. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (slyon, 14:41) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by slyon at 14:44. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (slyon, 14:44) === MIR related Security Review Queue === Discussion started by slyon at 14:47. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (slyon, 14:47) === Any other business? === Discussion started by slyon at 14:49. == People present (lines said) == * slyon (58) * sarnold (17) * didrocks (16) * joalif (4) * ubottu (4) * meetingology (2) == Full log == 14:31 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:31 Meeting started at 14:31:13 UTC. The chair is slyon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:31 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:31 #topic Review of previous action items 14:31 we'd didn't have any formal action items last week. 14:31 but how is the nullboot MIR progressing, joalif ? 14:32 slyon: just pasted my review, it's ok but needs security review 14:32 nice, thank you! 14:32 good morning 14:32 #topic current component mismatches 14:32 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:33 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:33 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:33 non-proposed looks rather clean. I created a stub bug for z3, which is in foundation's backlog 14:33 requests -> python-charset-normalizer feels new 14:34 sarnold: ACK. we had it last week. 14:34 licensecheck -> libobject-pad-perl feels new too 14:34 d'oh 14:34 its shared duty between foundations and server, I might find some time to investigate that, or maybe cpaelzer can. 14:35 wrt licensecheck -> lib*-perl and sphinx -> lib*-perl: 14:35 i investigated that. its the usual start of new cycle pulling in of new -perl dependencies. 14:35 but all are maintained by Debians perl team and usually in a good shape 14:35 I created a (combined) stub bug report about it, so maybe we can handle them all at once 14:36 nice nice 14:37 I also had a look at mutt vs gsasl. The SASL library was changed due to a licensing conflict and I'm currently consulting the team of what would be the best way forward. Most probably we need to MIR gsasl in addition to the existing SASL library 14:37 ruby-xmlrpc vs ruby-webrick is server, so maybe cpaelzer can investigate once he's back 14:37 the licenses, they give, they take 14:38 jaraco.text vs jaraco.context is openstack, so for jamespage to have a look at 14:38 I'm surprised ruby-xmlrpc is in main, but in focal libruby2.7 drags it around to everything.. 14:38 sarnold: yeah... initially I just wanted to revert that change, but after some consultation this doesn't sound like a good idea. 14:39 we also have gvfs vs libsoup3 – didrocks did you have a chance to investigate that? 14:39 slyon: it’s a real one, soname transition. However libsoup3 depends on sysprof right now which is uneeded 14:39 so, the goal is for jbicha to fix this in Debian 14:40 (assigned to him) 14:40 ok nice! 14:40 I guess status is correct, no? there is a MIR bug, set as incomplete and assigned 14:40 oh interesting, it’s not picked up 14:40 it doesn't show up in the report... did you subscribe ~ubuntu-mir ? 14:40 I will check 14:40 thanks 14:41 I thought I did, but maybe not clicked strongly enough :) 14:41 hehe 14:41 hehehe 14:41 #topic New MIRs 14:41 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:41 we have a bunch of new MIRs for review 14:41 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:41 bug #1971738 14:41 Bug 1971738 in ell (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ell" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971738 14:42 bug 1971973 14:42 Bug 1971973 in gnome-text-editor (Ubuntu) "[MIR] gnome-text-editor" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971973 14:42 bug 1971767 14:42 Bug 1971767 in libfreeaptx (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libfreeaptx" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971767 14:42 bug 1971739 14:42 Bug 1971739 in iwd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] iwd" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971739 14:42 I guess I can’t hide from gnome-text-editor. I can try taking iwd as well 14:42 I'd volunteer to do the iwd review, as I've been involved with that transition a bit 14:43 ok. didrocks: gnome-text-editor 14:43 slyon: iwd 14:43 oh, forget I told that, feel free to tak iwd :p 14:43 joalif: do you have capacity to take one as well? 14:43 i can take the libfreeaptx or the other one 14:43 i don't mind 14:44 ok joalif: libfreeaptx 14:44 and I guess we'll leave ell for cpaelzer 14:44 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:44 sounds good, if he can’t, I will take it next week 14:44 I see seb is spamming us with MIRs :p 14:44 thank you! 14:44 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:45 All I see here are my lib*-perl stub bug reports. 14:45 And libqtr-glib; didrocks did you find some time to look at that? 14:46 sorry, I missed that one, will do this week 14:46 thank you 14:46 my goal is to ping seb/jbicha to get news 14:46 but they were in the sprint 14:46 so… hard :) 14:46 yes that'd be great 14:47 :) 14:47 indeed 14:47 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:47 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:47 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:47 I see no changes here. 14:47 I started in on telegraf last night and I've got some panics that are stopping the build 14:47 do you have any news for us sarnold ? 14:48 I haven't invested yet, it failed over night :( I'll probably need help if these are in the tests, as I think at the moment 14:48 ok github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/outputs/influxdb_v2 0.020s 14:48 panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference 14:48 [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x18 pc=0x971eb1] 14:48 etc 14:49 ok. I think it would be best to reach out to sergiodj directly if you have any questions about that 14:49 thanks 14:49 #topic Any other business? 14:49 none here 14:49 nothing for me 14:49 none 14:50 cool, I'll assign the new MIRs to us as agreed upon above 14:50 other than that, we're done :) 14:50 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)