16:04 #startmeeting Ubuntu Backporters Team 16:04 Meeting started at 16:04:55 UTC. The chair is ddstreet. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 16:04 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 16:05 ok let's run thru the previous action items quickly 16:05 #topic previous action items 16:05 #subtopic ddstreet reply to previous ML requests and open backport request bugs indicating change in process (carried over) 16:06 carrying this over (and either of you feel free to handle it as well of course) 16:06 #action ddstreet reply to previous ML requests and open backport request bugs indicating change in process (carried over) 16:06 * meetingology ddstreet reply to previous ML requests and open backport request bugs indicating change in process (carried over) 16:06 #subtopic ddstreet update wiki docs with new process (carrired over) 16:06 done 16:06 and mapreri has the WIP page 16:06 (let's discuss that after the previous action items) 16:06 #subtopic ddstreet try to edit help.u.c page https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports 16:07 done, and i think we can all edit this page as we see fit, or at least i am able to for sure 16:07 #suptopic mapreri propose text for membership process to add to KB page 16:07 carry over i assume? 16:08 #action mapreri propose text for membership process to add to KB page (carried over) 16:08 * meetingology mapreri propose text for membership process to add to KB page (carried over) 16:08 #subtopic teward update tooling, requestbackport (carried over) 16:08 oh yes, actually I forgot /o\ 16:08 carry over 16:09 #subtopic teward review backportpackage tool (carried over) 16:09 carry both right? 16:09 correct 16:09 #action teward update tooling, requestbackport (carried over) 16:09 * meetingology teward update tooling, requestbackport (carried over) 16:09 been a tad busy with stuff still, FT job kinda took all my time >.> 16:09 #action teward review backportpackage tool (carried over) 16:09 * meetingology teward review backportpackage tool (carried over) 16:09 #subtopic (unassigned) define details on handling members/leads who are no longer participating (carried over) 16:09 #action (unassigned) define details on handling members/leads who are no longer participating (carried over) 16:09 * meetingology (unassigned) define details on handling members/leads who are no longer participating (carried over) 16:10 #subtopic (unassigned) define process/procedure for adding new members (carried over) 16:10 #action (unassigned) define process/procedure for adding new members (carried over) 16:10 * meetingology (unassigned) define process/procedure for adding new members (carried over) 16:10 #subtopic (unassigned) create list of packages excluded from backporting (carried over) 16:10 i think this one's done by mapreri 16:10 at least the initial list 16:11 I think we can consider that done 16:11 it should just grow over time as cases come by 16:11 yep 16:11 ok that's all the action items 16:11 let's move to the WIP wiki page 16:11 #topic wiki page 16:11 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/WIP 16:12 mapreri i just reviewed it and responded to your ML email, +1 on everything with a couple minor comments 16:12 I'm applying your suggestions right now actually 16:13 #link https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/2021-October/021819.html 16:13 for reference to those reading along 16:13 #link https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/2021-November/021820.html 16:14 teward any feedback on the wiki page changes? 16:14 there, all applied 16:14 great, and also thanks for opening the RT to get the wiki page history log working :) 16:15 if you think it's cool enough I can moved that WIP thing over to the main page too 16:16 no objection other than what changes have been made, though i'm missing an email so let me check the archive 16:16 yep no other feedback or complaints you hit all mine ddstreet 16:16 looks fine otherwise 16:18 back in like 2 seconds have to answer the door for LUNCH 16:18 then I suppose we can go ahead 16:18 should we start actually handling packages? :3 16:18 mapreri one last thing, can you replace the TBD in the 'Reason for Backport' section with a link down the the 'special cases' section, or just replace it with 'as listed below' 16:19 oh good point 16:19 sure 16:19 or, maybe just remove that line entirely; it's kind of redundant now 16:19 either way 16:19 mapreri: i think anything pending in the existing 'requests' sections needs to be just denied (the old way) and resubmitted if someone wants to get a backport still but using the new process 16:19 as for handling packages, anything currently in the queue without active requests per the process is also not prepared 16:20 my 2 cents in regards to "should we start actually handling packages" 16:20 sure 16:20 but we said to reject them once we actually have a page to point them to 16:20 right but that goes hand in hand ;) 16:21 so I think we can move WIP to the main page, then reject everything, then I can upload stuff (devscripts and u-d-t!), you two review them, and then let's open the gates for all by a mail to ubuntu-devel@ or such? 16:21 should we do ubuntu-devel-announce@? :O in ubuntu that's pretty much unused besides when the cycles starts/freezes… 16:21 we should at least email ubuntu-devel i think 16:22 but -announce i don't think is needed for it 16:22 yeah i think just stick to ubuntu-devel, the -announce is moderated and reserved for select announcements anyway i think 16:23 I moved the WIP text to the main page 16:23 i'm +1 on moving WIP to the main page and starting to handle packages! :) 16:23 \o/ hurray :) 16:23 your +1 is already too late :P 16:23 lol 16:23 retroactive +1 16:24 so i guess we're fully "running" now right? 16:24 I guess 16:24 wiki page is up to date, i don't think anythign else is needed on the community page right? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports 16:25 I'll have to read that page again at a different time 16:25 ack, and you should be able to edit it, if needed 16:25 btw, I'll upload udt/focal-bpo later today, and you can mess with the queue and see if/how that works? 16:26 yep i have a bit of time today, so i can process it once you upload 16:26 alright 16:26 after the mtg 16:27 mapreri also re: the bug i opened lp:1947192 i'm thinking now we should just close that as wontfix, yeah? 16:27 Launchpad bug 1947192 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] version 0.185" [Low, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1947192 16:27 i shouldn't have opened it in the first place 16:27 I think you need to assign a few actions (me uploading this, you reviewing the queue, somebody writing the -devel mail, ...) 16:27 I'll try to close that in the bpo upload, let's discover if that works? 16:28 (i don't think it will, but let's try) 16:28 #action mapreri upload u-d-t to focal 16:28 * meetingology mapreri upload u-d-t to focal 16:28 #action ddstreet review u-d-t upload to focal 16:28 * meetingology ddstreet review u-d-t upload to focal 16:29 who wants to write the email to -devel? 16:29 * mapreri looks grumpily at the ppc64el autopkgtest queue, stopping u-d-t 0.186 16:29 lol, yeah i heard there were some problems there (i've been out on vacation for a week, just back today) 16:29 I'll happily give that up. in the next ~10 days I'll be busy with family stuff, so not really up for more tasks atm 16:29 won't be me, i'm moving mt email between environments at the moment, so limited ability to email. 16:30 (so I can't send the email at the moment) 16:30 ack no prob i can take it 16:30 i can review your draft if you want to 16:30 #action ddstreet email ubuntu-devel list to announce re-opening of backports 16:30 * meetingology ddstreet email ubuntu-devel list to announce re-opening of backports 16:30 yep lemme action that too 16:30 #action ddstreet send draft email to mapreri before ubuntu-devel list 16:30 * meetingology ddstreet send draft email to mapreri before ubuntu-devel list 16:31 ok i think that's everything right? 16:31 for this topic yes at least 16:31 and i already have the actions for respoinding to open bugs and ML emails 16:31 and I think also for the other membership thing as well since that's waiting on me to draft the KB page I guess 16:32 yeah i think we got that in the earlier actions 16:32 #topic all other business 16:32 did i miss anything? or any other topics? 16:33 somebody pls get `DEB_VENDOR=ubuntu dch --bpo` to DTRT pls :puppy_eyes: 16:34 #action (unassigned) get `DEB_VENDOR=ubuntu dch --bpo` to DTRT pls 16:34 * meetingology (unassigned) get `DEB_VENDOR=ubuntu dch --bpo` to DTRT pls 16:34 lol 16:34 :* 16:35 should i schedule another mtg in 2 weeks? just in case? 16:35 it would be Nov 17 16:35 by then I'll have pretty much just come back from messy times, but I think we should regardless, at least to check in and keep up momentum 16:36 yep sounds good, it has been useful to have these mtgs at least as a target date for getting stuff done, in addition to the actual meeting content 16:36 mh dh 13 is not available in focal-bpo :( 16:36 #action ddstreet schedule following meeting for Nov 17 16:36 * meetingology ddstreet schedule following meeting for Nov 17 16:37 yeah i wonder if debhelper might be the first thing we need to backport 16:37 I wanted to go with something less critical first 16:37 otherwise we'll probably have to adjust the dh version for backported packages 16:37 I'll just s/13/12/ in this case, it doesn't matter 16:37 yep 16:38 note how somebody randomly did backport debhelper 12 to focal-bpo some time ago :> 16:40 mapreri what method do you use to check what's in the -backports pocket for releases? like, for a release you're not running 16:41 (oh, actually that was bionic not focal, sorry) 16:41 ah ok 16:41 i was going by memory 16:41 i was wondering why rmadison didn't show it 16:42 ok i think we're all wrapped up then 16:42 anyhow, I've got plenty of chroots and run apt policy there; or look at the launchpd ui. for whatever reason i never got my fingers into typing rmadison :! 16:42 E: ubuntu-dev-tools changes: backports-upload-has-incorrect-version-number 0.185~bpo20.04.1 16:42 another action ↑ :P 16:42 fix lintian 16:43 I'm sure lechner would do that right away once told 16:43 I: ubuntu-dev-tools changes: backports-changes-missing 16:43 #action (unassigned) fix lintian to not complain about ~bpo suffix 16:43 * meetingology (unassigned) fix lintian to not complain about ~bpo suffix 16:43 do we care about this in ubuntu? 16:43 is about using -v in dpkg-genchanges to include more than one entry in the Changes: field of the .changes file 16:44 used to be mandatory for debian backports, but it's not mandatory anymore (though I still take care of it) 16:44 i tend to think probably not, right? 16:45 it could be a really long list, or in some cases might not even be possible e.g. with a new major version 16:45 I also seem to remember launchpad is clever about that, at least it closes all bugs even if the .changes file doesn't mention them all, somehow. 16:45 why wouldn't be possible? 16:45 I can assure you that it's very much possible to do :> 16:46 it would just include the entire changelog then, right? 16:46 there is also -v0 to include all of the changelog in the .changes (example is when backporting a package that wasn't present in the target distribution 16:46 ) 16:46 but yes, I don't think we care here 16:46 i'm fine either way; it seems like it probably would just introduce noise instead of helping 16:47 I'm sure it would make many new contributors not used to low-level tooling (dpkg-genchanges in this case) scratch their heads :D 16:47 yeah i know there are some people who have ACL to upload who either don't know about needing to use -v or just forget about it 16:48 ok we're coming up to the end, any final items before we wrap up? 16:49 not from me 16:49 teward: ? 16:49 * mapreri also just dput, let's see 16:49 nope 16:49 none 16:50 Rejected: 16:50 Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True 16:50 dammit, I keep forgetting this lp thing :\ 16:50 hmm i've not hit that before 16:51 you likely don't build all of your uploads locally before uploading the resulting thing 16:52 i usually build the binaries in a separate container, while i build my source to upload on my main system 16:52 https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1699763 16:52 Launchpad bug 1699763 in Launchpad itself "source uploading with a .buildinfo containing hashes for binary is rejected" [Undecided, Confirmed] 16:53 also when uploading to ubuntu I need to be careful to upload the .changes generated in right env, else it won't have the Launchpad-Bug-Fixed field, etc etc. 16:53 ddstreet: anyway, it's in the queue now :) 16:53 guess this is all for today! 16:53 awesome! i'll review asap :) 16:54 thanks all! 16:54 #endmeeting