14:36 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:36 Meeting started at 14:36:44 UTC. The chair is doko. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:36 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:36 #topic Review of previous action items 14:37 we didn't have the meeting at all last week, so skipping 14:37 #topic current component mismatches 14:37 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:37 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:38 * sarnold gives his customary weekly ack to cpaelzer about backuppc 14:38 sarnold, status of backupppc related security reviews? 14:38 I don't remember seeing the libayatana-appindacator thing 14:38 doko: not yet started 14:39 ayatana looks incomplete, 2/3 packages done. maybe ping didrocks? 14:39 jamespage, can you review the cherrypy related ones, or should we split these? 14:40 mesa is still pending. I email didrocks two weeks ago. no reply yet 14:41 I'm around - sorry 14:41 ipmitool is oldish, but shows up in mismatches ... waiting on cpaelzer for that 14:41 thanks for backuppc @sarnold 14:42 IIRC ipmitool is from MAAS for MAAS 14:42 and no one ever cared about it 14:42 [Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Impish supported-maas seed] 14:42 yes 14:42 jamespage, fence-agents has been in main before. is it supposed to re-enter? 14:42 fence-agents comes from us I guess doko 14:42 as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004 14:42 yeah, we've had a discussion on the bug about the right names to use for the binary package that'll have agents we want to support 14:42 waiting for security atm 14:43 if we don't care about ipmitool, then maybe it should be seeded in the community-maas seed 14:43 who can confirm this? 14:44 Adam I guess 14:45 Collard 14:45 I hope that wasn't misspelled ... 14:45 I'll chase this with xnox 14:45 I think he set these seeds initially 14:46 freeipmi is in main, ipmitool and openimpi are not 14:46 unfortunately HW manaufacturers seem to be unable to settle on one 14:46 heh I didn't realize we had three of the things 14:46 we might end up taking it in in additon to the one we have, but these changes 14:47 seed changes I mean 14:47 that it is worth to start with a clarification 14:48 hmm, openimpi also looks to be in main 14:48 sarnold: oh your are right, agreed 14:49 so maybe we really have to take the third one in to make it a charm :-) 14:49 hah 14:49 or is it 'operator' now.. 14:49 other than the expected fight of who will own this I see no problem 14:49 and starting with xnox to calrify the intend doesn't sound like a bad start 14:50 thanks doko for offering to chase this down 14:52 I don't want to create actions for people not being present ... didn't work well last time 14:52 hehe 14:52 FYI I have reviewed prips which came in yesterday 14:53 and I have updated the status on a few to get them moving forward 14:53 but nothing that would be a new team todo 14:53 #topic New MIRs 14:53 shall we look at th ebug lists now? 14:53 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:54 That scary list is actually two 14:54 let us start with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libftdi1/+bug/1912371 14:54 oh hey and one of them is even good news :) 14:54 doko: in the update between commend 8 and 9 14:55 doko: did you have a look and acked it assinging it to security? 14:55 that wasn't clear to me looking at the bug this morning 14:55 if you have, then this is ready to go 14:55 if it was a mistake then we need to assign someoen for a MIR review 14:56 essentially William self-reviewed in commen 8 :-) 14:56 what's the libftdi and libftdi1 change amurray made in comment 16? 14:56 so your update could be seen as sign-off and Ack on that 14:56 ok, I'll chase this down as well, probably just needs a seed 14:56 sarnold: If I read correctly there is a debdiff that shall be applöied before promotion 14:57 yep, the symbols file should be fixed 14:58 I'll chase this down 14:58 thanks 14:58 let us go to the bigger chunks of work now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jaraco.classes/+bug/1930111 14:58 8 potentially easy python lib review tasks to assign 14:58 yep, already asked before. should we split this, or load it on jamespage? ;) 14:59 but the question upfront, who will own this? 14:59 Is that from openstack? 14:59 yes, openstack 14:59 I'd say we assign him and he can call out to us if needed 15:00 as he knows how this works even if he has no time to do it himself 15:00 python3-cherrypy3 | cherrypy3 | ceph-mgr | Ubuntu Developers | 228656 | 1181 15:00 from germinate so yes indeed from openstack 15:01 I've added an update and assigned jamespage to one of them 15:01 now it shoudl be clear 15:01 is that ok for everyone atm? 15:02 I'm slightly skeptical the world needs yet another "high performance python webserver", it feels like one of the other existing webservers ought to work.. 15:02 but perhaps that's not one to solve at this meeting 15:03 I agree 15:03 to both 15:07 ok 15:07 next ... 15:07 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 15:07 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:08 hmm, "new cherrypy3 18.6.0-1 release" .. we've got 8.9.1-8 packaged now.. this might be a big jump, heh 15:08 or just a rename 15:08 versions are smoke and mirrors 15:08 I guess there is only https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledmon/+bug/1794219 in this list to talk about 15:09 doko: this one seems that sil2100 decided to help sorting that out 15:09 doko: does tha answer we got from rex tsai satisfy that for foundations to go on? 15:10 ok, I'll take this 15:11 thanks ++ 15:11 #topic Any other business? 15:11 not from me 15:12 none from me 15:12 ok, finished! 15:12 #endmeeting