14:30 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:30 Meeting started at 14:30:02 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:30 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:30 hello didrocks ddstreet doko jamespage sarnold 14:30 #topic Review of previous action items 14:30 there were no actions from the call, but due to bug activity - and those are worth to be mentioned before we look into the bugs 14:31 on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libde265/+bug/1827442/comments/26 ddstreet found a bug being forgotten by being confirmed 14:31 Launchpad bug 1827442 in x265 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:31 he was so kind to bring it up 14:31 o/ 14:31 I've had cases before that got lost due to the same at least 3 or 4 of them the last 12 months 14:31 o/ 14:32 so revisiting our spec we have added "confirmed" to what we look at in the incoming queue 14:32 I've updated the remaining links that we had on the wiki page 14:32 and I've updated the state chart 14:32 Please speak up if you are against this and why 14:32 or tell me if you are +1 if you are 14:33 looks ok 14:33 +1 for me 14:33 ddstreet - you did the nitial change, so I gues you are fine as well 14:33 that is 4/5 and 100% of the people around today 14:33 thanks everyone 14:33 yep sounds good to me, thanks 14:33 That will be important later ... :-) 14:34 #topic current component mismatches 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:34 Nothing new AFAICS 14:34 sarnold: I'll use every week that I see backuppc here to remind you that this is a left-over security review from last cycle :-) 14:35 anyone seeing someitnhg worth to discuss int hose two reports before we go on? 14:35 i consider that a no, and otherwise speak up later please 14:35 #topic New MIRs 14:35 here we are special this week 14:35 no "new" in the sense of coming in this week 14:35 good morning 14:36 but a few that formerly where lost by being "confirmed" 14:36 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 o/ sarnold 14:36 so we need to open, read, discuss and potentially assign some next steps to those 14:36 let us get started 14:36 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 14:36 Launchpad bug 1827442 in x265 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:37 three source packages libde265 libheif x265 14:37 this was before we were more formal, correct and auditable 14:38 ddstreet and I wondered if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/1 was a full MIR-ack to all three packages ? 14:38 Launchpad bug 1827442 in x265 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:38 looks like a MIR-ack but need security in the "old" world 14:39 sarnold: the security reivews that are there are from you 14:39 sarnold: do you have an overview if this is all-ready or not? 14:40 I see an sec-Ack for libheif itself 14:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/24 14:40 Launchpad bug 1827442 in x265 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:40 cpaelzer: my recollection is that the 'mir process' (such as it was) decided only libheif needed a security review, and the other two packages in this bug weren't flagged as needing security review -- I don't know if cypher_mox's review was intended to cover all three or not 14:41 thanks sarnold 14:41 but aren't we doing security reviews for other codecs as well? 14:41 and vorlon has managed to only get the needed subset promoted in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/5 14:41 Launchpad bug 1827442 in x265 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:41 doko: yes we will 14:42 but essentially the two dependencies have just "entered the process" 14:42 They were identified later and not yet looked at thoroughly at all yet 14:42 so I'll set libheif to "in progress" reflecting that it is ready 14:42 and the other two we need to assign for an MIR review 14:42 volunteers ? 14:43 I'm away for this week mostly 14:44 and actually we need an owning team (likely foundations) and the QA-checks that the reporter is supposed to do 14:44 let me update the state and request that 14:44 then next week if someone cares about it we can assign those 14:44 sounds good 14:47 done https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/28 14:47 Launchpad bug 1827442 in libheif (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libheif" [Undecided,In progress] 14:47 next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-jquery/+bug/1906514 14:47 Launchpad bug 1906514 in node-jquery (Ubuntu Hirsute) "sizzle needs a MIR, or node-jquery needs dropping the recommends" [High,Confirmed] 14:47 from miles away that seems like "no more needed" 14:47 it isn't in mismatches anymore 14:48 I'd set the remaining tasks to invlaid 14:48 invalid 14:49 I don't want to monologue all of you down, at least throw in a "yeah", "yes", "no" sometimes :-) 14:49 next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1854362 14:49 Launchpad bug 1854362 in tcmu (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ceph-iscsi, tcmu, python-configshell-fb, python-rtslib-fb, urwid, targetcli-fb" [Undecided,In progress] 14:49 all right! lets go! wooooo! 14:49 thanks :-) 14:50 hmm, the the recommends is still there 14:50 looks like ceph is really exciting sarnold :) 14:50 doko: I think parts of node-jquery were demoted 14:50 oh yeah I'm all about object storage! 14:50 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1854362/comments/67 14:50 Launchpad bug 1854362 in tcmu (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ceph-iscsi, tcmu, python-configshell-fb, python-rtslib-fb, urwid, targetcli-fb" [Undecided,In progress] 14:50 is an ack for ceph-iscsi 14:51 tcmu is ready 14:51 the rest was promoted in the past 14:51 ahh, the node-jquery binary is now in universe, just libjs-query is in main 14:51 did we have open todos ... 14:51 just needing something pulling eph-iscsi to main, right? But we can at elast fix committed them? 14:52 yes 14:52 that is how I read it as well 14:52 updated 14:53 jamespage: I think that is for you now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1854362/comments/69 14:53 Launchpad bug 1854362 in tcmu (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ceph-iscsi, tcmu, python-configshell-fb, python-rtslib-fb, urwid, targetcli-fb" [Undecided,In progress] 14:53 "to act on" I mean 14:53 next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxcrypt/+bug/1865532 14:53 Launchpad bug 1865532 in libxcrypt (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libxcrypt (dependency of glibc)" [High,Confirmed] 14:53 doko: this is another case that came in via component mismatches it seems 14:54 This is promoted 14:54 at least the source is in main 14:54 it's in main ... 14:54 it might never have been in universe? 14:54 maybe one more binary needed to be promoted 14:55 hmm, no, my archive's got a bunch of the packages in universe 14:55 just close it? 14:55 done 14:55 ack 14:55 sorry, I have to drop for a conference call 14:55 next: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-oem-osp1/+bug/1846213 14:55 Launchpad bug 1846213 in linux-signed-oem-osp1 (Ubuntu) "[britney-block] linux-oem-osp1 (pulled in by some packages)" [High,Confirmed] 14:56 call + chat works ... somewhat ... badly :-) 14:56 gn8 doko 14:56 this was removed and no more needs action 14:56 yay 14:57 next (and last) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1852367 14:57 Launchpad bug 1852367 in mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mysql-router (mysql-8.0)" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:57 I have to admit I don't understand how an oem kernel package that's not seeded is useful.. 14:57 and the oem for new kernel procedure has changed in between, correct? 14:57 yes didrocks 14:58 yeah, removing 14:58 I have updated the oem case already 14:58 looking at mysql-router now 14:58 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1852367/comments/2 14:58 Launchpad bug 1852367 in mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mysql-router (mysql-8.0)" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:59 we just need to check those were done? ^ 14:59 #1 is the MIR ack 14:59 #3 is the security ack 14:59 and yes - #2 is the remaining "we should do" tasks 15:00 checking if the changelog mentions those ... 15:02 it doesn't feel like any changelog comments mention those 15:03 yep 15:03 I just checked buld and autopkg log 15:03 not covered yet 15:03 I'll take it back to the team to have a look 15:03 incomplete until then 15:04 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 15:04 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:04 The onyl recent update is telegraf 15:04 thanks for the review BTW 15:04 yw! 15:04 and the remaining cleanup is well on its way as it seems 15:04 so that will soon be fully ready or promotion 15:04 no action by us atm 15:05 #topic Any other business? 15:05 nothing for me 15:05 this was a more busy session - as I promosed four weeks ago :-) 15:05 I have nothing else to add 15:05 nothing from me 15:05 good spring (actually many years spring) cleaning :) 15:05 :D 15:05 hehe 15:06 yeah, let us wrap it for today then ... 15:06 o/ 15:06 #endmeeting