== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Ubuntu Community Council Meeting, 02 Dec at 23:10 — 23:36 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-12-02-23.10.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === Review Previous Action Items === The discussion about "Review Previous Action Items" started at 23:12. * '''teward to extend current TB members roles through EOY and notify TB about it as well.''' (23:13) === Meetings with Mark - 15 minutes tomorrow (jose) === The discussion about "Meetings with Mark - 15 minutes tomorrow (jose)" started at 23:14. === Membership Boards (RMB) === The discussion about "Membership Boards (RMB)" started at 23:27. === Any Other Business === The discussion about "Any Other Business" started at 23:29. * ''ACTION:'' everyone to review and comment (or at least +1) LC Committee draft == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * teward (47) * jose (34) * wxl (26) * toddy (8) * meetingology (5) * linaporras54 (3) == Full Log == 23:10 #startmeeting Ubuntu Community Council Meeting 23:10 Meeting started Wed Dec 2 23:10:44 2020 UTC. The chair is teward. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 23:10 23:10 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 23:10 #chairs teward jose toddy wxl 23:11 #chair teward jose toddy wxl 23:11 Current chairs: jose teward toddy wxl 23:11 there we go 23:12 Hello everyone! 23:12 and welcome back to another CC meeting! 23:12 #topic Review Previous Action Items 23:12 So I don't see the agenda give me a sec to pull the previous one up 23:12 about that: where are our meeting minutes from last time? i didn't see them on discourse 23:12 jose never posted them :p 23:12 thank you for reminding me 23:13 does anyone else have the availability to post them? 23:13 so the last meeting there was only one action item I think? 23:13 here ist the log: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-11-18-23.07.moin.txt 23:13 yep 23:13 #subtopic teward to extend current TB members roles through EOY and notify TB about it as well. 23:13 I did this, through Dec 30 23:13 haven't gotten anything from Mark yet 23:13 so that's still pending. 23:13 toddy: Can you please post them in Discourse? 23:14 jose: I will do 23:14 I'm meeting with Mark tomorrow to catch him up with the stuff we've been up to 23:14 I was able to get ahold of 15mins in his cal 23:14 ^ that 23:14 #topic Meetings with Mark - 15 minutes tomorrow (jose) 23:14 so things to get on his radar: 23:14 TB nominations 23:14 ^ that's #1 23:14 update on our membership board nominations 23:15 what else? 23:15 he sent me an email in response to mine about his vision for leadership and i have yet to get back to him to set an appointment 23:15 wxl: i haven't seen that email, we probably need to be looped in? 23:15 once the meeting is done anyways 23:15 yeah probably. i have no clue why he sent it to me alone 23:16 anyways i think it would be worthwhile to at least mention to him that that's on our minds and we'd like to set something up 23:16 +1 23:16 agree 23:17 other than that and the TB i don't have any pressing things that i feel we need to bring up to him 23:17 ok 23:17 i mean besides a general catch up 23:17 yeah, I'll loop him in about the RMB elections and the LC Committee 23:17 TB nominations come first 23:17 we *need* a TB 23:17 unless he wants us to start nominating ourselves 23:17 correct 23:18 I'll make sure that we get his perspective 23:18 another option is to extend this TB through .04, and have elections for .04 23:18 but I'll leave that as a last resort 23:18 wb linaporras 23:19 if it comes down to that, i'd agree with that 23:19 one thing mark mentioned if i got it right is that in some cases we may have stable leadership and maybe that's good enough 23:20 which is to say i think he means if people want to stay in leadership roles and they're doing a good job, let them be 23:20 which, applied here, may mean we do exactly that: just extend the tb 23:20 of course, that's very fair 23:20 if that's the case we might want to formalize that for the future as well 23:20 I also want to make sure that we have enough of a fresh vision sometimes, I don't want someone to be able to take a leadership role perpetually 23:21 yeah and that's part of why i was reaching out to him about his vision for things as i kind of struggle with how to codify that 23:21 ^ that 23:21 want me to raise that if I have time? 23:21 if you only have 15 minutes you won't have time :P 23:21 i think that's probably something for a focused meeting 23:21 right that 23:22 so a subsequent meeting focusing on the codification and vision of things 23:22 I've learned to have efficient meetings, but yes 23:22 with that being the sole focus of that meeting 23:22 i'll reply to his email soon and cc everyone and we'll work on getting together on it. failing that, i'll take notes for everyone :) 23:22 I intend to make that meeting a regular meeting (hopefully) 23:22 I will present that as an option, bi-weekly or monthly could work 23:22 sounds good, wxl 23:23 i think that would be a very good idea, jose 23:23 I agree, monthly would be awesome 23:24 okay, anything else we might want to bring up? 23:24 to mark or in general? 23:24 mark 23:24 not i 23:25 I would not know anything now 23:25 okay 23:25 well in absence of a tech board someone has to handle AAs - there's not enough of them I don't think to manage things in the tech side, but that can be brought to TB to bring to Mark at a later time 23:25 right now's not a good point to bother Mark with that too ;) 23:27 cool, next topic then 23:27 what is the next topic? XD 23:27 #topic Membership Boards (RMB) 23:28 We had the RMB vote recently, that was announced I believe and handled? 23:28 and sent out to the relevant mailing lists I believe too. 23:28 correct, all ready 23:28 I saw the mail. :) 23:28 it will be in effect as of December 4th 23:28 so we have the membership board there in place, effective Dec 4. 23:28 I didn't think that setting them up now for the meeting tomorrow would be reasonable 23:28 jose: agreed. 23:29 i just want it noted that we DID do things on that. 23:29 thank u jose! 23:29 so things aren't just dying there or in limbo. So thanks jose for driving that :) 23:29 #topic Any Other Business 23:29 I don't think there's anything else pressing unless anyone else wants to bring something up? 23:29 any progress with getting access to the CC board on Discourse? 23:33 i'm calling that a no 23:33 jose: ^ oyi answer wxl 23:33 what a no? 23:34 wxl> any progress with getting access to the CC board on Discourse? 23:34 I already said, they're still looking into it 23:34 didn't show up here 23:34 wut 23:34 i think you said it IN YOUR MIND 23:34 not yet, they're trying to figure it out 23:34 they are looking into the best way to do so 23:34 never got relayed then 23:34 jajaja... 23:34 yeah didn't come through here 23:34 also, other business: I send out the LC Committee draft over, please review and comment or just say +1 so that I know you reviewed 23:34 based on that, we can create pages/info 23:35 #action everyone to review and comment (or at least +1) LC Committee draft 23:35 * meetingology everyone to review and comment (or at least +1) LC Committee draft 23:35 anything else you thought you said, jose? 23:35 nope, that's it 23:35 awesome 23:36 ok then if there are no arguments, let's call this good in 10 seconds 23:36 ok 23:36 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)