14:30 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:30 Meeting started Tue Sep 15 14:30:17 2020 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:30 14:30 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 14:30 ping to ddstreet (excused today) doko_ didrocks999 jamespage sarnold 14:31 good morning 14:32 hi sarnold 14:32 let us get started and hope the others will join or already read 14:32 #topic Review of previous action items 14:33 I have had an action a few weeks ago that is partially resolved 14:33 I wanted to look into some of the germinate for some false-positives 14:33 ddstreet has taken one into a bug for probert back then 14:33 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/probert/+bug/1890301 14:33 Launchpad bug 1890301 in probert (Ubuntu Groovy) "component mismatch with probert-network" [Low,Fix committed] 14:33 I ahve four updates to that 14:34 #1 14:34 The usual output of germinate was i386 only (very misleading) 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.groovy/_germinate_output 14:34 now this is running amd64 (thanks cjwatson) 14:34 #2 14:34 Furthermore the real truth is neither of these architectures, but the superset of all combined. 14:34 Thanks to Laney we now have the germinate log of all of them at: 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/extra-germinate-output 14:34 With that we finally could explain probert-network. 14:34 It had "probert-storage | probert" and the former isn't on i386 14:34 So it selected the latter, but at the same time - on i386 - there is no probert-network. 14:34 paride will fix up the seeds (thanks) for probert to have them do what we want 14:34 ddstreet: so the bug will be fixed soon and also is finally fully understood 14:34 and finally 14:34 oh nice! 14:34 yeah, this all combined thing is always puzzling 14:34 #3 14:34 Germinate output was non reproducible 14:34 Also it did not include architecture on the log messages which was misleading 14:34 Once the following lands this will be good as well: 14:34 #link https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/germinate/+git/germinate/+merge/390466 14:35 so a few MPs to land and things will be even better 14:35 finally one bug I had to file which is in germinate 14:35 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1895011 14:35 Launchpad bug 1895011 in germinate (Ubuntu) "virtual-packages do not pick a seeded package (ordering dependent)" [Undecided,New] 14:35 that is what e.g. shows esmtp for now 14:35 overall major steps forward 14:35 hi 14:35 just wanted to keep you updated on the progress we made 14:35 hi doko_ 14:36 I don't remember other open action items (other than assigned reviews) 14:36 let us look at mismatches first as usual 14:36 #topic current component mismatches 14:36 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:36 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:36 there is still gnome-software, but we’ll give a seed fix a try for this beforehand 14:36 doko_: we have kept the lintian ->*perl* cases for you as usually you take them - would you this time as well? 14:37 thanks didrocks999 for an update on that one 14:37 esmtp I just mentioned to be a known fale positive 14:37 that's a big effort keeping it open for a few weeks ;p 14:37 pi-bluetooth from raspi-common-seed - probably for waveform 14:37 hehe 14:38 ok, will look at those 14:38 doko_: can you check with waveform in the foundations meeting what the plan on this one (pi-bluetooth) is and let us know next week? 14:38 the other two there have open MIRs we get to later 14:38 ok 14:38 ipp, octavia, sqlalchemy, .. all known in progress 14:38 as is shim-canonical 14:39 didrocks: I guess you still couldn't agree with the kernel team for khronos-opencl? 14:39 cpaelzer: didn’t hear from the management, despite several pings… 14:39 kind of helpless, I’ll ping apw directly on this 14:39 ok 14:39 also google-guest is in mismatches-proposed that will be a topic later on when we talk about new&incomplete bugs 14:40 ok that was mismatches, no further assignments out of those 14:40 #topic New MIRs 14:40 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:40 Thee to assign people to 14:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/raspberrypi-userland/+bug/1895133 14:40 Launchpad bug 1895133 in raspberrypi-userland (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libraspberrypi-bin libraspberrypi0" [Undecided,New] 14:41 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpi-eeprom/+bug/1895137 14:41 Launchpad bug 1895137 in rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rpi-eeprom" [Undecided,New] 14:41 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1892454 14:41 Launchpad bug 1892454 in ostree (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libostree-1-1" [Medium,New] 14:41 didrocks: the latter you looked at already 14:41 that we set back to new and is from desktop'ish scope 14:41 would you look at that (again)? 14:41 cpaelzer: I pinged Robert to get the right team subscribed before looking at the MIR, the status was reverted without subcription :/ 14:41 * didrocks will handle it 14:41 thanks 14:42 rpi-eeprom I'd take - eeproms are always messy in some way and will be interesting 14:42 raspberrypi-userland anyone? 14:42 ddstreet: isn't here today so he can't say yes/no but I know he has one assignment left of those last week 14:42 and will get to it once back 14:43 doko_: and me already got tasks today 14:43 ok, I'll take it 14:43 I know sarnold got some security reviews for google-agent which is a topic to come 14:43 ... 14:43 really, ok 14:43 I can have a look if you want 14:43 I was trying to force jamespage to say yes 14:43 ahah :) 14:43 doko_: is the winner this time 14:44 there will be more work didrocks :-) 14:44 noooooooooooooooooo 14:44 :) 14:44 there is *always* more work :) 14:44 doko_: I assigned you and me accordingly 14:44 true sarnold 14:44 ok that seems to be the new queue 14:44 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:45 two big blocks 14:45 block #1 is 14:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-guest-agent/+bug/1891929 14:45 Launchpad bug 1891929 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu) "[MIR] google-guest-agent" [Undecided,Incomplete] 14:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-golang-x-oauth2/+bug/1894731 14:45 Launchpad bug 1894731 in golang-google-protobuf (Ubuntu) "[MIR] golang-*, Go build dependencies of google-guest-agent" [Undecided,Incomplete] 14:45 first of all I really want to thank all of you for helping to churn through so many review tasks so quickly 14:46 didrocks: ddstreet: in particular - thanks 14:46 this case is now blocked on the following 14:46 7 are done for MIR - 5 of those on security now 14:47 another 5 were parially reviewed but identified work for the foundations team and rbalint is aware of them 14:47 the decisions if/how to handle these might be anywhere from 14:47 a) cut down the current dependencies a bit 14:47 to 14:47 b) add another 20 tasks 14:47 to c) stop the MIR entirely 14:47 I think none of the 3 are tempting :p 14:48 also, I bet upstream is testing with different versions of those libs than the archive 14:48 we will close out the remaining assigned tasks which is 1x ddstreet 14:48 didrocks: I have brought up the concern of testing across a different set of versions in my reviews and in feedback to the future owners of this stack 14:49 we will not proactively burst through the other 20 packages unless rbalint / foundations asks us for it 14:49 so for now we wait on their feedback 14:49 agreed 14:49 but as I said rbalint is aware, but I wanted to make sure you are all as well 14:49 just for completleness, I think there is a d) (or you accounted that in a) ) which is vendoring 14:49 yes 14:49 the permanent go-curse 14:49 yep :) 14:50 second context to mention here is 14:50 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1892559 14:50 Launchpad bug 1892559 in pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite" [Undecided,Incomplete] 14:50 opened by sarnold 14:50 afaics security tries to reduce the number of required packages before going further - is that correct sarnold? 14:50 thank you all for the work already done on the MIRs around google-guest-agent 14:51 yw rbalint 14:51 rbalint: just to be sure - you are ok that we go back from panic-mode to wait-for-feedback-mode on this one right? 14:51 cpaelzer: I believe pcsc-tools and libpcsc-perl were removed, which helps quite a lot :) 14:51 yes they were 14:52 sarnold: pcsc-lite would need to be fulyl evaluated 14:52 sarnold: it was in main without actual inspection in the far past 14:52 I asked if you could take a look and if you agree add that properly 14:53 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1892559/comments/7 + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1892559/comments/9 14:53 Launchpad bug 1892559 in pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite" [Undecided,Incomplete] 14:53 joy said you need it in comment #12 14:53 so I think we should add it properly 14:53 what does "add it properly" mean? 14:54 means: do the pre-checks as when filing a MIR task and if all looks sane set the task back to new 14:54 cpaelzer: aha! then I think I missed the 'set it back to new' then :) 14:54 cpaelzer: I added the prechceks to the description in comment #3 14:55 indeed 14:55 let us set it back then and I'll assign myself to get you going there 14:55 thanks 14:55 ok that is it on incompletes 14:55 #topic Any other business? 14:56 that already was a lot of content 14:56 that’s enough for me (FYI, ostree/libflatpak is definitively in the TODO list now for me) 14:56 but a) this is the phase of the cycle it always is and b) I'm happy to see that the MIR team seems to work effectively (looking back people didn't always have the impression) 14:56 yeah didrocks 14:57 thanks for coordinating this effectively cpaelzer :) 14:57 yes :) 14:57 ok it seems we all hav ework :-) see you next week then 14:57 see you! 14:57 #endmeeting