== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status, 21 Apr at 13:00 — 13:13 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-04-21-13.00.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === Review of previous action items === The discussion about "Review of previous action items" started at 13:00. === current component mismatches === The discussion about "current component mismatches" started at 13:01. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg === New MIRs === The discussion about "New MIRs" started at 13:02. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1871835 === Incomplete bugs / questions === The discussion about "Incomplete bugs / questions" started at 13:07. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir === Any other business? === The discussion about "Any other business?" started at 13:08. == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (39) * sarnold (6) * meetingology (3) * doko (2) * didrocks (1) * joeubuntu (1) * ubottu (1) == Full Log == 13:00 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 13:00 Meeting started Tue Apr 21 13:00:41 2020 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 13:00 13:00 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 13:00 #topic Review of previous action items 13:00 none open AFAIK 13:01 #topic current component mismatches 13:01 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 13:01 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 13:01 only known cases 13:01 the mass seed which isn't urgent part of 20.04 13:01 and the apport dependency which is the ordering of the deps 13:01 no action needed on those, any disagreement? 13:02 fine by me 13:02 ok lets go on - anyone feel free to speak up if we go too fast 13:02 #topic New MIRs 13:02 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 13:02 one real candidate 13:02 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1871835 13:02 Launchpad bug 1871835 in linux-raspi (Ubuntu) "[MIR] linux-raspi" [Undecided,New] 13:02 and actually I don't think this even needs a review 13:02 this is a kernel source like the many kernel sources built by the kernel team 13:02 just another flavor of it 13:03 doko: how did we add e.g. -azure and -gce abck in the day 13:03 does this really need a review - or can we promote it right away? 13:04 joeubuntu: sarnold: and from your POV - adding those would be a no-op right? 13:05 you track kernels anyway I guess 13:06 I don't see a problem, sarnold your thoughts ? 13:06 cpaelzer: yeah, I'm not sure how the zoo of kernels works out 13:06 doko: how was this handled in the past 13:06 I'd prefere to just do it the same way 13:06 which most likely means no new MIR process needed on this 13:06 cpaelzer: the one funny thing with pi is that it seems to have binary blobs that may be less maintainable than more 'normal' machine kernels 13:07 lets go through the rest of the agenda (all no-ops today I think) - we can wait for dokos answer in the last segment 13:07 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 13:07 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 13:07 cpaelzer: but that seems more like a business decision, "is this platform important enough to pay the costs", and hope that our partners will be able to supply us with fixes in five, ten years 13:08 nothing new in the incomplete 13:08 so we can go for 13:08 #topic Any other business? 13:08 and here I'd ait for doko to chime in how this was handled in the past 13:08 sarnold: I agree - this is a support statement more than anything else 13:10 can we move this meeting ~two hours later? that'd help me quite a lot :) it's 0600 for me, and while joeubuntu has been kind enough to take my place, that's been inconvenient all around 13:11 cpaelzer: no MIR required in the past, same as for the versioned source packages 13:11 thank doko, can I assign it to you for promotion on thaose terms then? 13:11 sarnold: 2h later I have other meeting conflicts, but 1h or 1.5h are fine 13:12 sarnold: would you mind starting something like a doodle poll for new times? 13:12 sure 13:12 cpaelzer: good idea, thanks :) 13:13 a pool sounds good to me. Most of the time, this meeting conflicts with some others for me (but 2 hours isn’t doable, so let’s see for a poll) 13:13 ok, then we are don for today 13:13 thanks everyone 13:13 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)