14:59 <slashd> #startmeeting DMB meeting
14:59 <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Feb 10 14:59:58 2020 UTC.  The chair is slashd. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
14:59 <meetingology> 
14:59 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
15:00 <slashd> #topic Review of previous action items
15:00 <slashd> #subtopic slashd handsome_feng Email interview
15:00 <slashd> rbasak's endorsement re-validation request seemed to have been answers by most (if not by all) endorser. Currently pending on cyphermox and rbasak's votes.
15:00 <rbasak> tsimonq2 hasn't replied yet
15:01 <cyphermox> I will vote today
15:01 <slashd> rbasak, ok so you prefer to wait for tsimonq2 re-endorsement ?
15:01 <rbasak> I had been waiting.
15:01 <slashd> rbasak, all good
15:01 <rbasak> I guess I can continue without, if he doesn't get back to us.
15:02 <rbasak> Let's give people some reasonable amount of time to respond.
15:02 <rbasak> Say a week? I'm not sure how long it's been.
15:02 <rbasak> I'd also like to update the application process page to avoid this situation occurring again.
15:02 <rbasak> Which I intend to JFDI, if people are fine with that.
15:02 <slashd> JFDI ?
15:03 <slashd> I'm bad with acronym
15:03 <rbasak> Just ... and Do It.
15:03 <slashd> gotcha
15:03 <slashd> rbasak, ok let's give it til friday then ?
15:03 <rbasak> Well, with no and.
15:03 <sil2100> My vote for handsome_feng is still valid if anything
15:04 <rbasak> Yes, OK.
15:04 <slashd> rbasak, good thanks
15:04 <slashd> #subtopic  re-election
15:04 <slashd> anything to add on this ?
15:04 <rbasak> The nomination period ends soon
15:04 <rbasak> I would like more nominations
15:05 <rbasak> Please be self-nominating
15:05 <slashd> if you are a coredev or MOTU ^
15:06 <slashd> I guess that's all we had in term of items to discussed, unless someone have something to add, we have 1 applicant today, Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski). He is applying for the SRU Developer application.
15:06 <slashd> dgadomski, can you introduce yourself ?
15:07 <dgadomski> sure
15:07 <slashd> wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dgadomski/UbuntuSRUDeveloperApplication
15:07 <dgadomski> Hi. I'm Dariusz. I work for Canonical. I am a member of the Sustaining Engineering team where I mainly work on bugs reported by Ubuntu Advantage customers. I'm applying for SRU developer.
15:07 <slashd> Do you guys have question for Dariusz ?
15:09 <cyphermox> I do not
15:09 <rbasak> dgadomski: how do you find the SRU process? Is there anything you would change?
15:11 <dgadomski> rbasak: I have seen it working well for years, I haven't noticed problems with the process itself, I'm not sure how that would fit in the process but maybe extending the number of people testing -proposed would bring an improvement
15:12 <rbasak> OK, thanks!
15:12 <rbasak> I have no more questions.
15:13 <sil2100> dgadomski: I have one question:
15:13 <slashd> I don't have question for Dariusz.
15:15 <sil2100> dgadomski: actually... looking at the upload history I already got my answer! Nevermind then ;)
15:15 <sil2100> No questions from me
15:16 <slashd> sil2100, lol
15:16 <slashd> seems like we are done with questions
15:16 <slashd> let's vote
15:16 <slashd> #vote Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
15:16 <meetingology> Please vote on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
15:16 <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
15:16 <slashd> #voterequired 4
15:17 <sil2100> (wanted to ask about SRU requirements re: devel work, but then again I see the applicant already demonstrates the required knowledge)
15:17 <sil2100> ;)
15:17 <slashd> sil2100, and it's a sru developer application, we don't expect much devel work w/ that application
15:18 <sil2100> Yeah, but it's important to know what the stage of the package should be in devel for a fix to be SRUed
15:18 <slashd> right
15:18 <slashd> +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team.
15:18 <meetingology> +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team. received from slashd
15:19 <rbasak> +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors
15:19 <meetingology> +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors received from rbasak
15:20 <cyphermox> +1
15:20 <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
15:20 <rbasak> FWIW, SRUs to three packages in the past year is on the lower boundary of what I'd accept though.
15:20 <sil2100> +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!)
15:20 <meetingology> +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!) received from sil2100
15:20 <slashd> #endvote
15:20 <meetingology> Voting ended on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
15:20 <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
15:20 <meetingology> Motion carried
15:21 <slashd> Congrats dgadomski !
15:21 <rbasak> However everything I've seen looks diligently done - thank you!
15:21 <ivoks> congrats dgadomski \o/ :)
15:21 <ddstreet> congrats dgadomski!
15:21 <dgadomski> thank you :)
15:22 <mfo> dgadomski, congrats! o/
15:22 <slashd> Thanks everyone for joining the meeting, I guess we are done for today !
15:22 <slashd> #endmeeting