16:02 #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team 16:02 Meeting started Tue Aug 18 16:02:42 2015 UTC. The chair is arosales. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:02 16:02 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 16:02 #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting 16:03 smoser to check with Odd_Bloke on status of high priority bug 1461242 16:03 bug 1461242 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Vivid) "cloud-init does not generate ed25519 keys" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1461242 16:03 fix released now so we should be ok on that bug 16:03 rharper, I think you were going to review numad 16:04 any actions or follow up we should document? 16:04 I'll take it that numad was reviewed properly there, if there are any comments around numad please ping here 16:04 #topic Wily Development 16:04 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WilyWerewolf/ReleaseSchedule 16:05 So feature freeze is on Thursday. 16:05 I've been busy working on things with that deadline and so haven't reviewed anyone's bug fix submissions yet, sorry. 16:05 I know coreycb and folks are working hard on the OpenStack pacakges 16:05 busy week with feature freeze 16:05 #subtopic Release Bugs 16:06 #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-w-tracking-bug-tasks.html#ubuntu-server 16:06 I think we said here that bugs are behind feature freeze atm 16:06 only 1 high bug atm 16:06 Does anyone have anything that needs sponsoring that is an item that cannot be uploaded after feature freeze? 16:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-tornado/+bug/1478149 16:06 Launchpad bug 1478149 in python-tornado (Ubuntu Wily) "python-tornado tests fail against python3.5" [High,Triaged] 16:07 slangasek marked that one as high so looks like it needs a review 16:08 volunteers? 16:08 ok ping if any folks can take a look at 1478149 16:08 #topic Server & Cloud Bugs (caribou) 16:09 caribou any updates for server and cloud bugs? 16:09 . 16:09 . 16:09 . 16:09 #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (matsubara) 16:09 matsubara, any bits for QA? 16:09 . 16:09 . 16:09 . 16:09 Completed SRU verification for bug 1336742 16:09 #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb, sforshee, arges) 16:09 bug 1336742 in squid3 (Ubuntu Trusty) "Caching responses with "Vary" header" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1336742 16:10 other than that, nothing else to report arosales 16:10 thanks matsubara 16:10 good to hear SRU verified for 1336742 16:10 smb, sforshee, arges: any bits from kernel? 16:10 . 16:10 . 16:10 . 16:10 arosales: just missed you earlier on numad, no progress on that front at this time, I'll carry the action for a bit till we get some time 16:11 # action rharper review numad 16:11 trhanks rharper 16:11 #topic Upcoming Call For Papers 16:11 I don't know of any upcoming events for CFP deadlines, any ones folks would like to bring up? 16:11 . 16:11 . 16:12 . 16:12 #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events 16:12 Any upcoming event folks would like to call out? 16:12 #link http://insights.ubuntu.com/event/juju-charmer-summit-2015/ 16:12 if folks are interested in Juju and Charm authoring 16:12 #topic Open Discussion 16:12 Any other topics? 16:12 . 16:12 . 16:12 . 16:12 rbasak I wanted to chat about the bcache-tools sru 16:13 Sure 16:13 what all do we need to bring that into trusty ? 16:13 It will probably need a tech board exception. Technically the SRU team could choose to accept it I think, but historically they never do. So best to send to the TB in the first instance to save time IMHO. 16:14 right, ok 16:14 Once that's done, a backport needs to be prepared and tested, sponsored and then the SRU team will be able to accept it in the usual way. 16:14 is there a general template, or do we fill out the SRU info in the bug and forward that ? 16:14 ok, I suggest we do some of the work in parallel 16:14 I know we've tested the vivid version in trusty 16:14 not clear about what's currently in wily 16:14 We don't really have a template as it's pretty exceptional. An email to the tech board mailing list with a request and justification should do. 16:14 which I suppose is what we'd bring in? instead of vivid version ? 16:15 rbasak: ok 16:15 We'd want to backport something that's already in the archive ideally. 16:15 ok 16:15 If the Vivid version is tested and the Wily version is at increased risk of introducing regression (as opposed to fixing bugs that we want in the backport) then I don't see any reason why we can't backport the Vivid version. 16:16 sure 16:16 I'll have a look at the delta 16:16 Thanks! 16:16 #topic Announce next meeting date, time and chair 16:16 #info NEXT MEETING: Tuesday 2015-08-25 at 1600 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting 16:17 next chair = gnuoy 16:17 thanks! 16:17 Thanks arosales 16:17 #endmeeting