== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting Meeting, 16 Apr at 17:00 — 17:57 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2015/ubuntu-meeting.2015-04-16-17.00.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === Scheduling the next CC catch ups === The discussion about "Scheduling the next CC catch ups" started at 17:02. === Catching up with the IRC Council === The discussion about "Catching up with the IRC Council" started at 17:17. === Any other business === The discussion about "Any other business" started at 17:53. == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * elfy (95) * dholbach (87) * elky (43) * mhall119 (17) * Pici (10) * cprofitt (9) * meetingology (5) == Full Log == 17:00 #startmeeting 17:00 Meeting started Thu Apr 16 17:00:24 2015 UTC. The chair is dholbach. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 17:00 17:00 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 17:00 #chair elfy mhall119 17:00 Current chairs: dholbach elfy mhall119 17:00 Do you have any agenda items you'd like to propose? 17:00 yep 17:01 I'd like us to set up a schedule for the catch ups, which should be quick I assume 17:01 that would be the same one :D 17:01 and ...ish 17:01 new teams about 17:01 and maybe do a quick review of which boards/councils have members expiring soon 17:02 any other items? 17:02 sort out the next catch ups perhaps 17:02 that sounds fair to me :) 17:02 #topic Scheduling the next CC catch ups 17:02 shall we note it all down on http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZQTluJERI3? 17:02 works for me 17:03 brilliant 17:04 mate/edubuntu swap *shrug* 17:04 though once LTS gets close - we'll want to add them back perhaps 17:04 instead of combining Core Apps and Phone, how about having separate check-ins with those teams working on core, desktop and phone? 17:05 mhall119: make the change :) makes sense 17:06 do you think we can do all three in one hour's meeting? 17:06 mhall119: well 17:06 hello 17:06 #chair cprofitt 17:06 Current chairs: cprofitt dholbach elfy mhall119 17:06 cprofitt, we're scheduling catch ups for the new cycle: http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZQTluJERI3 17:07 mhall119, I just added a new date at the bottom - feel free to spread teams out if necessary 17:07 if they are *that* different - split them to different weeks - also gives people who can only drop by irregularly half a chance 17:08 mhall119: ^^ 17:08 I'm happy either way - I don't have a strong preference when to have Core Apps vs Phone people there 17:08 elfy: they are different teams in Canonical, but they'll probably all have the same issues if any 17:08 I'd much prefer to give a team the whole half a session each 17:08 mhall119: that may be so, but 17:09 the community might have different points - and people are free to ask things here I guessed 17:09 I would prefer to give a half session to each as well. 17:10 makes sense 17:10 at the least 17:10 I just added more dates 17:10 we can spread out if we want 17:10 having too much time is better than not having enough for a team IMHO 17:10 yep 17:10 and we can always wrap early if all is well and there's nothing to talk about :) 17:11 we can always rethink the cycle after - which IS the pre-LTS one 17:11 Hi. i noticed yesterday that dholbach mailed the irc council about a catchup a while back but i don't think it was confirmed or anything. I'm guessing by that pad that it's not still on? 17:11 elfy: my guess is that the community would be more uniform across those three than Canonical employees 17:11 but that's just my guess 17:11 elky, it was scheduled, but in the end I can't remember if anyone showed up 17:11 mhall119: that is fine - but I see no real reason to not try it 17:11 elky, or one person showed up belated ... or something 17:12 dholbach: well... you tried to schedule one for today and now 17:12 so i showed up now :P 17:12 schedule for today? 17:12 IRC Council 5th March 17:12 it was an email you sent 17:12 oooooooooh! 17:12 elky: I guess something was lost there, however - we've got time if you want to talk to us 17:12 trying to schedule for now 17:13 sorry about that 17:13 now I get it 17:13 * elfy always has time for some tabfail sessions :D 17:13 we said: "nobody showed up, let's reschedule" and I picked a date 17:13 but 17:13 but failed to update the agenda page 17:13 ... and maybe nobody confirmed the date 17:13 if you want to talk to us now elky - we will :) 17:13 elfy: dholbach: well, basically we're still regrouping. we're currently trying to find a new meeting time that will actually work. 17:14 ok... shall we wrap up the scheduling discussion? 17:14 then move on to IRC business? :) 17:14 dholbach: just put it on back burner 17:14 elfy, cprofitt, mhall119: any more points on the catch up schedule? or shall I just mail it to the CC later on, so everyone can have a look at it and make final changes before we announce it? 17:15 elfy: I guess it's been a bit of a *time* over there, I get hints here and there 17:15 dholbach: how about moving back to it if we've time? 17:15 dholbach: i understand the motivation, i just didn't want you guys to be stood up again if the topic did happen :) 17:16 but i'm here now, so make of that what you will 17:16 elky: I was not talking to myself but you ^^ 17:16 elfy, ok... I just felt that we were close to resolving it as far as we can now and could move on if we agreed, but yeah, sure 17:16 elfy: hehe sorry still waking up 17:16 really should really re-nick as hobgoblin for a while :D 17:16 hehehe 17:17 ok.... 17:17 #topic Catching up with the IRC Council 17:17 hey elky - thanks a lot for showing up :) 17:17 not a problem 17:17 how are you doing? how's life in the IRC world? :) 17:18 so as i said before, we're still regrouping and working out our schedule to fit in with the current members 17:18 how far are the members spread out? 17:19 one in finland, the rest of us across the US 17:19 (i'm in the US now) 17:19 so again the Euro/US bias 17:19 oh wow, I had no idea :) 17:19 we have people who can't irc from work though, which complicates things a lot 17:20 really hard to deal with that I guess 17:20 that's our biggest issue 17:20 and that for sure 17:20 which - the work or bias? 17:20 we're considering moving to a weekend meeting, but we're yet to confirm a time 17:20 how often are you planning to meet as the IRC Council? 17:20 or how often did you meet in the past? 17:20 elfy: the irc restriction at workplaces 17:20 right 17:21 dholbach: the meeting schedule is monthly, which is why it's taking a while to get something sorted i guess 17:21 elky: but if the location bias could be looked at later - less of an issue? 17:22 elky: any reason to have monthly meets? 17:22 elfy: i don't think location bias is one that can be fixed easily. 17:22 elfy: as opposed to? 17:22 I'm not sure if it helps, but can "day to day tasks on the IRC Council", "IRC Council meeting times" and "helping out as an IRC member/op/helper" be separated somehow? 17:22 a bunch of things could maybe be discussed via mail as well 17:23 elky: we (FC) set up monthlies, ended up as pointless 17:23 elfy: in that you have no meetings now? 17:23 we dealt with the immediate issues as and when 17:23 that would be nice, but that wasn't the expectation put on the council in the past 17:23 then have now moved to quarterly 17:23 elfy, I guess it depends on how approachable you as a council or board are... or how well people in your community understand they can contact you 17:24 a meeting as "another opportunity" can help, but yeah, it can be pointless too :) 17:24 elky: well - rules are great in a workplace, but as volunteers the expectation should be that things just woirk 17:24 dholbach: yea for sure 17:24 elfy: i'm glad to see this shift in attitude :) 17:25 elky: first shift on CC, years at forum ;)_ 17:25 I am ALWAYS happy to talk to anyone at all 17:25 sorry everyone, home-life interruption, I'm back again 17:26 dholbach: in terms of the issues we generally deal with, generally a meeting would be awkward and unfair on someone -- like a public humiliation 17:26 though if it is one of those 'trolly' things, move it to official 17:26 elky: the same - we just would not do that (FC) 17:27 elky: how about the IRCC and FC actaully do that mad thing 17:27 talk to each other :D 17:27 that'd be awesome indeed 17:27 I guess it depends what you need to talk about 17:27 I am sure we could help each other in how we deal with things 17:27 if you want to bring up a process improvement 17:27 dholbach: things like 17:27 or applying as a member 17:27 do we NEED to meet monthyl 17:27 that might be suitable for an IRC Council 17:27 meeting 17:28 well - membership process - I bet we could learn from each other 17:28 it could also help to review work items or stuff 17:28 but the minutae - less so 17:28 dholbach: the stuff we're responsible for, is way too time sensitive to wait a month., 17:28 or even a week reallt 17:29 elky, I wasn't trying to say that you should wait until the next meeting 17:29 more a sort of 'well how do you as a group work? thing 17:29 elky: exactly - we are lucky 17:29 we get a day(ish) 17:29 sometimes it helps to make an appointment, come together as a group and take time to discuss something 17:29 (outside the day to day business) 17:30 dholbach: it really does not work like that - sorry ;) 17:30 but I'm not trying to impose 17:30 especially if you spend the previous week/month jotting down topics in an agenda 17:30 dholbach: we haven't needed to do that in the past few months, but yes that has happened in the past. 17:30 right 17:30 elky: I'll mail you with the FC hat 17:30 elfy: cool 17:31 and apart from meeting times... how are things going there? :) 17:31 heh 17:31 relatively drama free so far this year 17:32 \o/ 17:32 which is a nice change of pace. last year burned a councillor or two out, so yes. 17:32 do you have enough helpers in the channels? 17:33 Sorry I'm late, work stuff. (reads scrollback quickly) 17:33 hi Pici 17:33 we seem to be ok at the moment, but i believe we have some applications to look at anyway 17:33 that's great 17:36 cool 17:36 how about people who applied as Ubuntu members through IRC contributions? 17:36 elfy: is there any particular change that you think contributed to this being a drama-free year? 17:36 something we can maybe roll out to other parts of the community 17:36 I'm asking because we noticed in other teams that there's a lot of people who could apply, but didn't :) 17:37 \o/ I think that ^^ was for elky :D 17:37 mhall119: no, last year was quite exceptional. i don't recommend having that drama so that the next year is an improvement 17:37 dholbach: we see the same thing 17:37 elky: yes, this elfy/elky thing is killing my brain 17:37 :D 17:38 :D 17:38 who said that !!! 17:38 ouch :) 17:38 we break brains in #xubuntu* all the timne 17:38 annnnnnnnd .... 17:38 you owe me a clean screen ... 17:38 haha 17:39 mhall119: you can't tell the difference bewtween and elf and an alk? 17:39 elk? 17:39 dholbach: i can't remember the last time someone applied through the ircc for membership, but it's a small team in comparison to even some loco teams 17:40 right 17:40 cprofitt: I don't think I've every seen either, to be honest 17:40 lol 17:40 We have a lot of people seeking help pass through, but a smaller community of helpers. 17:40 I think we should all try to encourage folks who haven't applied yet :) 17:40 hah 17:40 the forums had to work at having people apply via the forums for Ubuntu membership 17:40 I should add a post-it note to my laptop screen about that 17:40 do IRC folks know that it is a potential route? 17:41 dholbach: seriously - for sure - supporters deserve membership 17:41 yes 17:41 cprofitt, there's a process and it's documented on the wiki, but that probably doesn't answer your question :) 17:41 they do know. most of the irc team are members as far as i know 17:41 elky: how are they told about it? 17:41 elky, that's good to hear :) 17:41 elky: we kind of did a bit more over forum side 17:42 I'l try and summarise the whole 'how we do it' 17:42 elfy: at one point, the irc team required membership to be op, so i think there was a difference in the population there 17:42 yea 17:42 Usually it comes up because someone notices that they aren't a member, and then the suggestion to become one goes on and then we can initiate the process. 17:42 dholbach: the process being documented is a good start, but I know the forums had to really encourage people to get the process started. 17:43 yeah 17:43 I think, and this might be up for debate 17:43 that criteria needs to at least 'look' or 'read' easier 17:44 many people have said to me they would 'fail' 17:44 their words 17:44 :/ 17:44 guys, i need to go of and do something else now, can we wrap this topic? or pici can take over? 17:44 elky: go do life stuff - thanks 17:45 thanks guys, one less thing on the todo list :) 17:45 I will be in contact withe the IRCC 17:45 cool 17:45 as FC 17:45 Okay :) 17:45 is there anything the IRC Council could generally need help with? or anything the CC could do? 17:45 but yea Pici :/ 17:45 people should not feel that way 17:46 dholbach: I'm not sure we need anything as of yet. Like elky said, the drama has been very low recently. 17:46 excellent - thanks a lot for all your hard work! 17:46 mhall119 is going to be in touch with you quite soon again I guess :) 17:47 or did you guys talk about UOS channels already? :) 17:47 dholbach: I haven't, I don't know which of us was tasked with getting UOS channels setup 17:47 Sounds like it was you ;) 17:47 I can't remember either - I guess we're going to figure it out 17:48 Just poke us whenever you're ready and we'll do what needs to be done 17:48 <3 17:48 cprofitt, elfy, mhall119: do you have any more questions for Pici and the IRC folks? :) 17:48 nope, it sounds like things are going well which is an improvement from before 17:48 none yet 17:48 so I'm quite happy 17:48 yay 17:49 I will do as I said and mail you as FC hat - with what we do and how 17:49 brilliant 17:49 thanks a lot Pici and elky! :) 17:49 np :) 17:49 I would love for the IRCC to say some "try this one ..." 17:50 elfy, regarding the catch-up schedule... did you have anything else you wanted to talk about or shall I send it out for a sanity check of the rest of the gang as a next step? 17:50 anyway - thanks elky Pici 17:51 dholbach: send it to list, but was mostly about making sure no-shows had reason 17:51 and people like Mate - new - were added in 17:52 good to go here 17:52 elfy, erm... do you mean by "no-shows had reason" checking if the teams excused themselves from the meetings? 17:52 thanks elky and Pici for coming 17:52 my brain is a bit slow at processing English today it seems 17:53 if all's well, I'll just mail out the schedule in a bit :) 17:53 dholbach: Texas accents have that affect 17:53 jetlag too! :) 17:53 I'd be happy to look over the expiry dates of all councils/boards again as well to help with the planning 17:53 #topic Any other business 17:54 dholbach: yea I did :) 17:54 go ahead 17:54 or rather - they might be LTS only 17:55 dholbach: I've got time tomorrow to at least try and contact edubuntu etc 17:55 cool 17:55 unless you mean mail schedule to CC to double check 17:56 in which case - go ahead 17:56 oh... I just sent it over for review 17:56 :) 17:57 yep, just got it :D 17:57 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)