16:02:26 #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team 16:02:26 Meeting started Tue Jul 10 16:02:26 2012 UTC. The chair is jamespage. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:02:26 16:02:26 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 16:02:32 #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting 16:02:35 none 16:02:37 \o/ 16:02:44 #topic Quantal Development 16:02:50 #topic Release Bugs - http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html 16:03:19 It's mostly MIR bugs which are causing woe 16:03:21 So we have quite a few MIR's to support cep work 16:03:36 bug 1017972 1017978 1022493 16:03:38 Launchpad bug 1017972 in libunwind (Ubuntu) "[MIR] google-perftools, libunwind" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1017972 16:03:43 jamespage: perhaps someone should try to interface closer with the MIR team to get these progressing ? 16:03:58 Daviey, as they are all mine I will do that 16:04:09 jamespage: super! 16:04:14 and then 16:04:17 bug 974584 16:04:22 Launchpad bug 974584 in sysvinit (Ubuntu Quantal) "Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/974584 16:04:29 hallyn: ^ 16:04:40 #action jamespage to checkin with MIR team on expected review timescales for server MIR's 16:04:40 * meetingology jamespage to checkin with MIR team on expected review timescales for server MIR's 16:04:45 Daviey: should be fixed ind ebian 16:04:47 in debian 16:04:56 there is quantum/quantumclient MIRs as well 16:05:17 zul: please make sure you subscribe ubuntu-server-release 16:05:29 zul: can you action following them up? 16:05:30 jamespage: ack 16:05:54 Daviey: i tried to get them moving today but no one from the MIR answered my query 16:05:56 #action zul to make sure relevant MIR bugs have ubuntu-server-release subscribed 16:05:56 * meetingology zul to make sure relevant MIR bugs have ubuntu-server-release subscribed 16:05:56 jamespage: well, technically ubuntu-server-release is for issues we are blocking on.. MIR bugs mostly block on others, no? 16:06:13 Daviey, I don't see much differentiation 16:06:32 jamespage: Well, there is a separate section on the report specifically for tracking MIR's 16:06:40 (without us having to subscribe ubuntu-server*) 16:06:43 Daviey, oh - I see 16:07:04 Daviey, what magic makes things appear their? 16:07:28 jamespage: that is for packages that we are bug subscribers for and has ~ubuntu-mir subscribed to the bug, and not Fix'd 16:07:32 ie, just works. 16:07:56 Daviey, OK - so we just need to sub ~ubuntu-server to those packages then 16:08:03 zul: ^^ got that? 16:08:08 I'll update mine as well 16:08:09 yah.. which is usually a prerequisite for MIR 16:08:14 jamespage: yeah 16:08:17 Daviey, ack 16:09:21 hallyn: re bug 974584 - can I assign that bug to you or is there someone else more appropriate? 16:09:23 Launchpad bug 974584 in sysvinit (Ubuntu Quantal) "Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/974584 16:09:41 jamespage: assigning me wouldn't help :) it's fixedin debian, just needs to be merged 16:09:44 i just commented on the bug 16:10:01 (needs to be merged, and i don't have upload rights) 16:10:05 jamespage: hallyn is mostly on plus1 for now.. better someone else 16:10:22 hallyn, ah - rightoh - its actually sysvinit not lxc - my mistake 16:10:51 zul: bug 1020313 16:10:53 Launchpad bug 1020313 in horizon (Ubuntu) "openstack-dashboard hijacks the web root" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1020313 16:11:12 OK to sweep that up in the next set of updates? 16:11:49 jamespage: is that in precise? 16:12:02 I don't think we can reasonably SRU that 16:12:14 Daviey, I agree 16:12:32 soren: ^^ 16:12:58 next? 16:13:02 OK _ while we figure that out 16:13:16 Still have a couple of FTBFS issue we are tracking 16:13:29 I know the genshi one is not moving forward upstream 16:13:42 so we may need to spend some time working a patch ourselves 16:13:51 so if anyone wants to volunteer.... 16:14:08 other than that ... moving on 16:14:11 #topic Blueprints - http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/ubuntu-server.html 16:14:28 bah wrong ling 16:14:29 link 16:14:33 trend line is still a bit off 16:14:40 http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/ubuntu-server.html 16:14:46 oooh...lets do the time war again 16:14:53 lol 16:15:05 Daviey: did you mention we need re-classify topics? 16:15:12 smoser: I've been meaning to suggest that we redo the work items for the apt blueprint once we have feedback 16:15:20 arosales: no 16:15:42 or reorder BPs under topics 16:15:46 or neither :-) 16:15:59 rbasak, that seems reasonable. 16:16:12 -Action arosales, update the topics/blueprints? :) 16:16:40 Daviey, arosales: please can we understand the context for this change? 16:17:10 * Daviey hands the mic to arosales. 16:17:25 Daviey: I already put the dependencies on the BPs 16:17:42 perhaps I classified then under the incorrect topic though 16:18:12 I'll take an action to get this straigned out and get the trend line to track our work correctly 16:18:54 #action arosales to sort out blueprints and get the trend line working correctly 16:18:54 * meetingology arosales to sort out blueprints and get the trend line working correctly 16:18:56 ta 16:19:26 lets have a @daily reset-trend-line.py cronjob 16:19:44 I'm not going to focus on any specific blueprints; but I would recommend everyone review ~weekly 16:19:54 I've also been using the +upcomingwork view in Launchpad 16:19:56 https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+upcomingwork 16:19:59 for example 16:20:18 which gives you more of a time based view of whats next.... 16:20:34 anyone have anything else for blueprint status? 16:20:39 ..... 16:20:42 .... 16:20:44 ... 16:20:46 .. 16:20:47 . 16:20:51 nope 16:20:52 OK 16:20:58 hometime \o/ 16:21:00 #topic 12.04.1 Development (jamespage & smoser) 16:21:33 i believe i was probably supposed to have done something here. i think i said i'd look at our list of items. but I have not. 16:21:35 * ScottK uploaded postfix 2.9.3 for a MRE SRU yesterday. Waiting for someone else in ubuntu-sru to accept it. 16:21:36 We have managed to push few quite a few SRU's 16:21:52 thanks ScottK 16:22:02 *push through 16:22:15 smoser - lets do that tomorrow 16:22:32 #action smoser and jamespage to review and assign SRU bug across team. 16:22:32 * meetingology smoser and jamespage to review and assign SRU bug across team. 16:22:33 jamespage, ok. 16:22:55 http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/rls-p-tracking-bugs.html is the/one list, and as you can see, server has a nice long list of bugs 16:22:57 wee! 16:23:29 smoser: most of those bugs are also on 16:23:38 http://people.canonical.com/~jamespage/server-sru/precise-sru.html 16:23:57 maas and juju specifically have a large number of unassigned high priority items 16:24:13 anyway - looks like folk will have bugs coming their way tomorrow onwards.... 16:24:16 bugs are overated 16:24:28 #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events 16:24:39 any events in the next two weeks we should be aware of? 16:25:04 OSCON coming up on the 16th 16:25:13 m_3 and jcastro attending 16:25:21 i will also be at oscon 16:25:37 a veritable server-team fest! 16:25:43 OK 16:25:48 #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) 16:25:54 hggdh, around for an update? 16:26:44 ... 16:26:45 #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb) 16:26:49 smb? 16:26:49 yup 16:26:52 So I have been chasing some quantal regression of an older (b44) nic, trying to get kexec/kdump working in precise/quantal, chasing some 32bit Xen HVM problem and err, that might be all. Something else I should be aware (iow questions)? Oh, and /me being in Portland, OR next week. 16:26:54 .. 16:27:44 any questions for smb? 16:28:13 nope - next! 16:28:23 #topic Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak) 16:28:27 I've been working on a hacky patch against MAAS trunk that will make it provision ARM machines. The idea is that this can eventually be adapted into first class support. The patch is currently up-to-date against MAAS trunk, and I'm just waiting on the last cobbler-replacement pieces to land. 16:28:36 Nothing else to report. 16:28:38 Any questions for me? 16:29:05 rbasak, I have a question - would it be possible to get the openvswitch kernel module enabled for the ARM kernels? 16:29:24 I believe its upstream for the 3.4 series we are currently using 16:29:32 That's something I'll have to ask of the kernel team 16:29:48 rbasak, that would be helpful (only hit this today) 16:30:11 In quantal? Or do you need a precise SRU? 16:30:21 #action rbasak to find out whether openvswitch module can be enabled for quantal ARM kernels 16:30:21 * meetingology rbasak to find out whether openvswitch module can be enabled for quantal ARM kernels 16:30:27 rbasak, quantal is OK 16:30:33 This is for the openstack module I presume? I forget its name 16:30:41 quantum 16:30:46 Yeah that's it 16:30:51 OK I'll find out 16:31:04 plus openvswitch is way cooler than doing old style bridging... :-) 16:31:12 apw: ^^? :) 16:31:17 any other questions for rbasak? 16:31:33 jamespage: which kernels in particular? 16:31:43 jamespage: omap4, armadaxp, highbank, all of the above? :) 16:31:47 rbasak: whilst i remember, shall we have a quick catchup tomorrow morning? 16:31:48 rbasak, all of the above 16:31:53 :) 16:31:59 Daviey: sure 16:32:11 OK 16:32:13 #topic Open Discussion 16:32:27 anyone have anything for open discussion? 16:32:30 nope 16:32:53 right-oh 16:32:55 #topic Announce next meeting date and time 16:33:16 jamespage: we should be able to test if the dkms modules build 16:33:24 zul: it does not 16:33:35 oh...poop 16:33:49 July 17th 2012, 1600 UTC right here 16:33:58 until then... 16:34:00 #endmeeting