21:06:18 #startmeeting 21:06:18 Meeting started Mon May 28 21:06:18 2012 UTC. The chair is stgraber. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 21:06:18 21:06:18 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 21:06:20 fine :) 21:06:54 #topic Action Review 21:06:56 the main thing I see not on the agenda is the Mythbuntu LTS plan 21:06:59 FWIW 21:07:13 wiki doesn't list anything, so I guess we're good there? 21:08:02 #topic Mythbuntu LTS plan 21:08:04 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-May/001258.html 21:08:25 we don't have quorum but I guess we can at least look at it and discuss it 21:08:40 three is quorate 21:09:40 oh right, forgot we're just 6 21:10:01 I've just rather belatedly followed up to the list with my thoughts 21:10:22 Yeah, without superm here, I'd rather do e-mail as well. 21:10:31 superm1, I mean. 21:10:34 basically that I can see some possible problems but it seems a reasonable thing to try 21:10:45 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-May/001277.html 21:12:01 It'll be interesting to see. If it works out well, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw more like this. 21:12:34 I do worry a bit about intermediate bitrot; there is some devil in the detail. 21:13:11 Probably not enough to scupper the idea in the case of Mythbuntu. A flavour with wider focus might have more difficulty, I feel. 21:13:34 if we decide to allow it, we'll need to update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors to reflect this as they'll by definition won't meet the "Must have a proven track record of participating in at least 2 non-LTS releases before applying to TechnicalBoard for LTS designation." 21:14:12 Huh? Mythbuntu has participated in considerably more than two non-LTS releases. 21:14:28 I don't think it would be a brilliant idea to allow it for entirely new flavours. 21:14:46 Two years is too long a period for any kind of agility in trying out new things. 21:15:37 hmm, indeed, reading it again, I didn't interpret this properly ;) For some reason I parsed that as we want them to release two consecutive release prior to an LTS, but that's indeed not what it says :) 21:17:04 No, it was intended as "must not be total newcomers" really 21:18:31 right, so should we just continue the discussion with Mario on the mailing-list? 21:18:47 Sounds good. 21:19:06 #topic Select a chair for the next meeting 21:19:07 At least he's had a reply now :) 21:19:35 cjwatson: so I guess next chair in the list is you? 21:19:40 Yep 21:19:45 * cjwatson checks the calendar 21:20:02 And I believe I'm even around that day 21:20:07 #action cjwatson to chair the next TB meeting (11th of June) 21:20:07 * meetingology cjwatson to chair the next TB meeting (11th of June) 21:20:23 #topic AOB 21:20:30 anything? 21:20:52 Not from me. 21:20:55 Nor I 21:21:01 alright 21:21:04 #endmeeting