#title #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-arm Meeting started by ogra_ at 15:08:02 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2011/ubuntu-meeting.2011-12-08-15.08.log.html . == Meeting summary == *spec status, http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/ubuntu-arm.html *ARM Server Status (NCommander, Daviey) *Kernel Status (cooloney, ppisati) *ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) *ARM Hardfloat status (infinity) *ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) *QA Status (GrueMaster, mahmoh) *Linaro Updates (rsalveti) ''ACTION:'' rsalveti to track the gles driver status for armhf for the vendors we support (rsalveti, 15:45:54) ''ACTION:'' work with jcrigby to update the mx53 kernel (rsalveti, 15:46:40) ''ACTION:'' rsalveti to kick someone to fix bug 838200 (GrueMaster, 15:46:52) *AOB Meeting ended at 15:48:09 UTC. == Votes == == Action items == * rsalveti to track the gles driver status for armhf for the vendors we support * work with jcrigby to update the mx53 kernel * rsalveti to kick someone to fix bug 838200 == Action items, by person == * rsalveti ** rsalveti to track the gles driver status for armhf for the vendors we support ** rsalveti to kick someone to fix bug 838200 == People present (lines said) == * ogra_ (128) * infinity (42) * rsalveti (37) * GrueMaster (31) * janimo (13) * ppisati (12) * meetingology (6) * doko (2) * ahs3 (1) * ubottu (1) == Full Log == 15:08:02 #startmeeting ubuntu-arm 15:08:02 Meeting started Thu Dec 8 15:08:02 2011 UTC. The chair is ogra_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot. 15:08:02 15:08:02 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 15:08:20 agenda is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/Meeting/2011/20111208 15:08:31 seems ther are no action items 15:08:35 :) 15:08:48 so lets go over the standing items ... 15:09:18 [topic] spec status, http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/ubuntu-arm.html 15:09:45 doesnt look bad ... are all specs on there now ? 15:09:51 shout if you are missing any 15:09:56 I should probably fill in some work items on my specs before I get yelled at, shouldn't I? 15:10:04 might help 15:10:12 And I should break the livefs-in-soyuz WI out of image-pipeline into a spec. :/ 15:10:23 Cause, well, a month of work isn't a WI. 15:10:24 also make sure they are approved, have a prio and are assigned to precise by davidm 15:10:54 My bare-metal spec is still under review. 15:11:08 poke davidm please, once he is back 15:11:24 Not that it matters much. It was mainly designed to be informational. 15:11:30 i really would like to have the tracker working before i start my vacation in a week 15:11:32 ogra_: I'm on holidays in a week and a day. Can I count on you to bug me to make sure my specs are sane before that? 15:11:48 (Today's a bit too busy on the armhf porting front for me to do too much paperwork/drafting) 15:11:54 infinity, will try to, i'm on vac. from 19th on myself 15:12:07 moving on then ... 15:12:07 ogra_: From the 16th here. :) 15:12:19 well, thats the same :P 15:12:27 ogra_: No, as in, I'm taking the 16th off. 15:12:39 [topic] ARM Server Status (NCommander, Daviey) 15:12:47 aha ... yeah, ok, thats different 15:13:11 Daviey, any server news (since NCommander seems to have vanished off the face of the earth) 15:13:43 * ogra_ suspects not ... 15:14:04 well, lets move on ... we can come back to it if someone serverish shows up 15:14:12 [topic] Kernel Status (cooloney, ppisati) 15:14:28 armhf support has hit the archive (as you may have noticed) 15:14:35 and 3.2.0-x too 15:14:38 apart from mx5 i think 15:14:39 Has anyone taken the 3.2 omap4 for a solid spin on a Panda yet? 15:14:44 * ahs3 is server-ish but has no news 15:15:00 infinity: i found a bug this morning 15:15:10 ogra_: mx5? is it community supported or what? 15:15:16 ppisati, linaro 15:15:17 Now that mine's not stuck building ghc, I can make it grumpy with 3.2 and armhf. 15:15:33 ppisati: Yay bugs. Is it any worse than the ones we currently have? :) 15:15:44 infinity: panic on reboot if a usbhdd is used, i already pushed a new kernel with an ext4 fix and that too 15:16:07 if pulling the cord on reboot is not a problem, feel free to update now 15:16:09 we only provide SD images anyway ... just ignore it :P 15:16:14 ppisati: Snazzy. I need to test if 3.2.x fixes all my NPTL/TLS woes, and I suspect it will, from what markos has been saying. 15:16:15 else, wait until tomorrow 15:16:21 ok 15:16:27 No, don't ignore it! 15:16:31 heh 15:16:39 * ogra_ wasnt serious 15:16:47 ogra_: do you want me to do the armhf stuff for mx5? 15:16:51 sorry fior being late, hhello 15:16:57 ppisati, ask jcrigby 15:17:00 ok 15:17:02 ppisati: Should be jcrigby's alley, no? 15:17:02 janimo, np 15:17:05 ppisati, is that not linaro task? 15:17:19 janimo, i guess john appreciated help 15:17:23 zalong with a 3.0 kernel for mx5 whic I hear is available 15:17:27 * ppisati leaves the mx5 to its destiny... 15:17:28 Anyhow, we're in no huge rush on mx5/armhf. We have Panda and ac100 to play with. 15:17:28 I would assume we want armHF on mx5, since everything else is moving off armel. 15:17:28 :) 15:17:31 and we would appreciate being able to build images :) 15:17:32 And lots of bugs to shake out. 15:17:43 yeah 15:18:09 GrueMaster, we do, but we're suddenly so ahead of time that it doesnt bite us to wait another week or two 15:18:24 Well, and we have plenty of userspace bugs to shake out. 15:18:28 especially for an image thats a "tech preview" 15:18:35 Kernel space is identical from armel to armhf, so I'm less concerned. 15:18:41 any other kernel bits ? 15:18:44 We'll get there. 15:18:46 else i'll move 15:19:03 ogra_: Boogie on. 15:19:05 [topic] ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) 15:19:12 (and everyone else :) ) 15:19:20 Thanks to armhf, the armel FTBFS list is looking better too. :P 15:19:23 In fact, the whole distro is. 15:19:24 armhf ftbfs looks very very good 15:19:30 armhf == free rebuild test. 15:19:33 gave back a few things, next up libo test, once I install armhf on the board 15:19:34 yep 15:19:58 libreoffice needs love. Not sure if doko and Sweetshark are still going back and forth on that. 15:20:04 I hope so. 15:20:09 * ogra_ looked into some bits and wasted a lot of time for getting an ubiquity build env up today... 15:20:10 I'm working on ghc and gnat. 15:20:20 infinity, I'll look at it, doko said he's done as far as he's concerned 15:20:23 And we have people pondering looking at fpc. 15:20:51 anything else ? 15:21:04 netinstall. 15:21:09 (fpc needs a full port and bootstrap at the upstream level, if you speak fluent pascal and arm ASM without context-switching between the two, speak up) 15:21:12 ftbfs ?? 15:21:38 No, fail to install. libc6 udeb. 15:21:44 * ogra_ moves on 15:21:49 [topic] ARM Hardfloat status (infinity) 15:21:53 :) 15:22:03 i guess there isnt much to add 15:22:03 There we go. Now you can bring up netinst. ;) 15:22:12 wouldnt that belong into images ? 15:22:25 other than "things are going really, really well with armhf" (much better than expected), we have some bugs to shake out. Installer oopses, etc. 15:22:31 Someone is moving the meeting too fast for me to type. 15:22:42 ogra_: It's both? I dunno. :P 15:22:48 ogra_: It's HF-specific, I believe. 15:22:52 the queue seems to have ~3000 packages ... is that accurate ? 15:22:56 ogra_: Yeah. 15:22:59 wow 15:23:01 qtmobility needs fixing 15:23:05 so we should be doen by the weekend 15:23:19 ogra_: FSVO "done"... There's lots to do still. 15:23:27 doko, universe *shrug* .... that has time 15:23:36 ogra_, kubuntu package set 15:23:42 Universe is big. Fix early, fix often. 15:23:44 argh 15:24:07 how about the kubuntu guys ? did someone talk to them ? 15:24:23 It just has a bad symbols file. 15:24:26 5 minute fix. 15:24:27 Move on. 15:24:30 k 15:24:41 [topic] ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) 15:24:49 started hf testbuilds 15:25:00 which was somehow trashed in the middle by broken packages 15:25:09 a new omap4 build is just running now 15:25:27 if that succeeds too (ac100 works already) i will switch on autobuilds tomorrow 15:25:32 netinst needs (at least) my mklibs fix uploaded and a d-i rebuild. 15:25:34 But might need more. 15:25:35 for everything but mx5 15:25:47 yep. hunspell-en-us broke the world (not just arm) 15:25:51 yep 15:25:53 It sure did. 15:25:59 but its fixed 15:26:03 as is ubiquity 15:26:25 so i dont expect the currently running omap4 build to fall over 15:26:53 but we'll see :) 15:27:01 anything else for images 15:27:18 * ogra_ waits for GrueMaster to not speeed to fast for the old man :) 15:27:29 Hey! 15:27:36 *g* 15:27:46 ok, moving then 15:27:51 We're all old. :P 15:27:58 [topic] QA Status (GrueMaster, mahmoh) 15:28:04 GrueMaster, stage is all yours 15:28:25 Still working on automation for SRU testing. Seems that everytime I get one test working for QRT, another breaks, due to x86 requirements. 15:28:56 how about your jenkins stuff, when is that due to move to the official jenkins instance ? 15:29:10 And I still don't have a clear scenario on what to test for SRU approval. Currently I run the QRT kernel tests, and a few other things. 15:29:28 (doesnt seem to be there yet ... i was looking for it for a report i had to write for david yesterday) 15:29:36 I won't move it to Jenkins until I can get it stabilized here. 15:29:40 ah, k 15:29:55 And since I have very little visibility with them, it is much harder. 15:30:00 well SRU approval is indeed tricky 15:30:11 since it usually refers to one specific bug 15:30:23 which your test would have to reproduce 15:30:27 Only in that there is no documented "This is what we run to approve". 15:30:51 well, "does the bug still occur" is what we run i would guess 15:31:04 no idea if thats even remotely automatable 15:31:23 you can surely automate regression testing ... 15:31:25 Problem with that is that there are a LOT of tests that were fixed on x86 that still exist on arm. 15:31:31 but likely not the verifgication 15:31:56 I can only automate what I know (which isn't much). 15:32:00 right 15:32:30 And when the upstream test scripts keep breaking, I have to manually intervene. 15:32:36 Making automation moot. 15:32:38 indeed :/ 15:33:13 So far, this have been my primary focus since UDS. And it is taking way too much of my time. 15:33:47 any chance to get some external help from i.e. linaro ? 15:34:00 i would assume they suffer similar issues in some areas 15:34:08 or do they do everything from scratch 15:34:32 It isn't really a linaro thing. It is mainly working with the security team to fix their wrt test scripts. 15:34:56 ah, yeah, and thats something linaro doesnt touch at all 15:35:01 And linaro is more interested in performance benchmarking. Not sure they do any SRU testing. 15:35:12 they dont do SRUs indeed 15:35:38 anything else for QA ? 15:36:08 I would like to thank NCommander (if he were here) for providing me a hacked netinstall for Maverick & Natty on Panda. At least I can automate the install for that part of the SRU testing. 15:36:31 * ogra_ applauds the absent NCommander 15:36:43 It also has helped expose a bug introduced in another package (procps) that was in proposed. 15:36:56 That affected all platforms. 15:37:02 great 15:37:24 And I'm done. 15:37:41 [topic] Linaro Updates (rsalveti) 15:37:46 Nothing more to see here, move along. 15:37:51 * rsalveti waves 15:37:57 heys rsalveti 15:38:08 guess no much to report during this week 15:38:18 marcin was able to push some of the fixes to doko 15:38:20 rsalveti, do you know what the status of mx5 3.0 kernel is? 15:38:21 for the cross toolchain 15:38:44 janimo: we should be pushing a new 3.1 kernel soon, once jcrigby is done with the ci bp 15:38:45 rsalveti, with the enormous speed that armhf gets forward we are very likely to swithch asap 15:38:50 Can you nudge your guys to fix the beagleXM network issue? 15:38:51 probably in the next few days 15:38:53 rsalveti, is linaro prepared for that ? 15:39:07 ogra_: sure :-) 15:39:15 we also want to switch asap :-) 15:39:17 (wrt binary drivers mainly) 15:39:18 rsalveti, ah great. So 3.1 will be pushed to the archives 15:39:27 ogra_: well, that's the complicated part 15:39:37 talked with ti but that is still not a priority for them 15:39:41 rsalveti, i'll bring the panda stuff up in tomorrows call 15:39:53 but what about beagle ? 15:39:56 yeah, would be better to do the follow up tomorrow 15:40:01 or other vendors 15:40:13 ogra_: same thing, they don't care much about armhf atm 15:40:18 do you have any lever in linaro you could move them with ? 15:40:23 sigh 15:40:28 sure, anmar is our guy for it 15:40:32 will ping him about it 15:40:36 that smells like another release without unity 3d 15:40:48 even though we have the code now 15:40:51 nicolas said he'd try to build the driver for armhf 15:40:58 nothing we will support can run it 15:41:09 and then see how that goes, but if he needs to put some work on that, it'll probably be hard to have it released 15:41:11 rsalveti, right, as i said, thats for the call rtomorrow 15:41:12 yeah 15:41:26 rsalveti, regarding the cross-build of firefox and chromium that riku is doing, do you know what can be done to get the multiarch-fixed libs in precise? They are now in a PPA, and riku has no upload right, but I am not sure if anything is done to push them ATM 15:41:35 and he is aware that he has all bits for building already 15:41:57 janimo: yeah, that's why we have https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+spec/push-multiarch-changes-for-cross-precise 15:42:12 janimo: the goal for this bp is to have at least everything in a bug with the patch attached 15:42:20 but atm he's doing well on both ubuntu and debian 15:42:36 janimo: and also poked him to update your request for feedback 15:42:47 rsalveti, I saw that but it was not clear to me whether wotk is ongoing or stalled (or not a prio for linaro) 15:42:53 wrt pushing to the main archive 15:43:05 janimo: that's the main thing he's working atm 15:43:08 ok 15:43:11 he finished the chromium one already 15:43:17 thanks 15:43:20 so now he's just working on pushing it to precise 15:43:26 feel free to ping him about it anytime 15:43:42 guess that's all from my side 15:43:43 * ogra_ guesses FF has a higher prio on our side 15:43:52 so two actions 15:44:01 at least thats how i understood smagoun 15:44:05 well having all the depends in is what matter a lot too, as others use them 15:44:14 yup 15:44:16 yep 15:44:44 anything else ? more questions ? 15:44:49 nops 15:44:54 * ogra_ moves to AOB then 15:44:54 how to add action with this bot? 15:45:02 should use #action? 15:45:10 i think angled brackets 15:45:19 but hash might also work 15:45:31 try it :) 15:45:42 I thought it was square braces? :P 15:45:54 #action rsalveti to track the gles driver status for armhf for the vendors we support 15:45:54 * meetingology rsalveti to track the gles driver status for armhf for the vendors we support 15:45:56 youre so square :P 15:45:56 Its hash, but has to be done by the moderator. 15:45:58 yup :-) 15:46:04 Or that. 15:46:06 GrueMaster, apparentl not :) 15:46:21 rsalveti, you said two actions ? 15:46:37 * ogra_ waits for the second before he moves to AOB 15:46:40 #action work with jcrigby to update the mx53 kernel 15:46:40 * meetingology work with jcrigby to update the mx53 kernel 15:46:44 done! 15:46:45 great :) 15:46:52 #action rsalveti to kick someone to fix bug 838200 15:46:52 * meetingology rsalveti to kick someone to fix bug 838200 15:46:53 Launchpad bug 838200 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Precise) "No network support on Beagle XM" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/838200 15:46:58 sorry, I'm in two meetings 15:47:00 [topic] AOB 15:47:03 GrueMaster: thanks 15:47:04 anyone ? 15:47:13 :) 15:47:14 * ogra_ has nothing 15:47:21 I'm dry. 15:47:41 seems nobody else either 15:47:45 going once 15:47:52 twice... 15:48:02 sold to the guy in underwear .... 15:48:05 #ednmeeting 15:48:09 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot)