== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting-2 Meeting, 05 Jan at 17:06 — 17:44 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting-2/2016/ubuntu-meeting-2.2016-01-05-17.06.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === action review === The discussion about "action review" started at 17:06. === tech board re-election === The discussion about "tech board re-election" started at 17:08. * ''LINK:'' https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2013-December/001759.html * ''Vote:'' extend current TB term by one month for the re-election (Carried) * ''ACTION:'' pitti to send out call for nominations to u-d-a@, collect proposals for two weeks, and send to sabdfl * ''LINK:'' https://launchpad.net/~techboard/+members whee! === AOB === The discussion about "AOB" started at 17:37. == Vote results == * [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting-2/2016/ubuntu-meeting-2.2016-01-05-17.06.log.html#70 extend current TB term by one month for the re-election]] * Motion carried (For/Against/Abstained 4/0/0) * Voters mdeslaur, infinity, slangasek, pitti == Action items, by person == * pitti * pitti to send out call for nominations to u-d-a@, collect proposals for two weeks, and send to sabdfl * sabdfl * pitti to send out call for nominations to u-d-a@, collect proposals for two weeks, and send to sabdfl == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * pitti (54) * sabdfl (31) * infinity (24) * meetingology (13) * mdeslaur (8) * slangasek (7) == Full Log == 17:06 #startmeeting 17:06 Meeting started Tue Jan 5 17:06:35 2016 UTC. The chair is pitti. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 17:06 17:06 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 17:06 #topic action review 17:06 * pitti slangasek to document juju, docker exceptions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Special_Cases 17:06 * pitti infinity to follow up with maas SRU exception 17:06 the usual? 17:07 * pitti doesn't suspect any progress over the holidays 17:07 Yeah, not so much. 17:07 indeed not, sorry :) 17:07 no worries, just following the protocol 17:07 nothing on the ML either except for being on the CC checkup meeting 17:07 so I guess that leaves us to 17:08 #topic tech board re-election 17:08 I notified Mark about our timeout and asked for re-adding all of us for another month 17:08 does anyone have any experience running the election? 17:08 does anyone remember what we did two years ago for the election? 17:09 I know someone set up a poll, maybe Mark himself, maybe someone from CC 17:09 we had an email from dholbach back at the beginning of December, pointing to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Restaffing which suggests that the board itself "usually" runs the election 17:12 ok, that doesn't tell much about the operational details of setting up the voting, but before that Mark needs to appoint candidates anyway 17:12 ok 17:14 TBH, my motivation for doing a fourth 2-year term is relatively low -- we haven't really been that useful in the last two years IMHO 17:16 I'd like to see us get more useful, but I'm not sure how to magically make that happen. 17:16 was there a call for nominations last time? I can't seem to find it 17:17 my recollection was that Mark hand-picks? 17:18 yeah, mine to 17:18 ok 17:19 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2013-December/001759.html 17:19 is what I found from the last time 17:19 hello all 17:19 Oh hey, look. 17:19 sabdfl: hi! 17:19 happy new year to you too, infinity 17:19 sabdfl: hi! happy new year 17:19 hey slangasek, pitti, mdeslaur, good to see you all 17:19 and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2013-October/001734.html 17:20 oh, hello sabdfl! happy new year! 17:21 i believe i and to you too pitti, i hope you guys all had a very restful and happy holiday 17:21 well, that came out all wrong 17:21 * pitti reorders :) 17:21 s/i believe i// 17:22 pitti, was the link re cor-dev membership as a requirement, or staggering terms? 17:22 sabdfl: the mails from two years ago above were just about procedural issues and pretty much the same questions that we have now 17:22 sabdfl: but ISTR that core-dev should be a rather strong requirement 17:24 yes, i think so too, though i would tend to filter nominations that way in any event 17:24 sabdfl: so what are the next steps? should we sent out a public call for nominations, or do you want to ponder that and nominate yourself? 17:24 am i interrupting or can we talk about elections? 17:24 cool 17:24 sabdfl: it's our only topic and it's going on right now 17:24 public call for nominations please, i just shortlist 17:24 ack 17:26 I nominate the current board. *cough* 17:26 i'd like to discuss nominations with the T, but i believe your only list is public? 17:26 TB 17:26 right, it is 17:26 so that'd be individual mails 17:26 will do 17:27 may i ask that the current TB extend for 3 weeks to cover a 2-week call for nominations and a 1-week election? 17:27 sabdfl: I mailed you the other day with proposing an extension by one month 17:27 I don't think any of us have issues with that, so long as you click the buttons in LP. 17:27 I'm fine with that 17:28 (The lack of permissions has already caused some issues :P) 17:28 i'll ask folks to ack if they want me to do the clicky click 17:28 (FTR, ack from me as well) 17:29 pitti: You're chairing, startvote +1mo and clicky clicky? :P 17:29 Or 3wk. 17:29 Or whatever. 17:29 as for the nominations, mail to u-devel-announce@? who should the nominees be sent to? I'm happy enough to collect them in private, or should they go to u-devel-discuss@? 17:29 #vote extend current TB term by one month for the re-election 17:29 Please vote on: extend current TB term by one month for the re-election 17:29 Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) 17:29 +1 17:29 +1 received from pitti 17:29 +1 17:29 +1 received from mdeslaur 17:29 +1 17:29 +1 received from infinity 17:30 need slangasek for quorum 17:30 pitti: If they're being filtered, they should be sent privately. No one needs the public embarrassment of self-nominating and being rejected. 17:30 yes, that's what I thought 17:31 when I collect them privately, I won't do any replies or discussion, just assemble the list and send them to sabdfl after 2 weeks 17:31 +1 17:31 +1 received from slangasek 17:31 (FTR, if anyone else wants to, I happily hand that over :) ) 17:31 #endvote 17:31 Voting ended on: extend current TB term by one month for the re-election 17:31 Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 17:31 Motion carried 17:31 sabdfl: thanks in advance for the button pushing 17:32 pitti: You're the most trusted of all of us, happy to let you be the man behind the curtain. :P 17:33 love the voting thing, it's such a good idea! 17:33 sabdfl: while we are at it, who has experience with setting up the actual voting in two weeks? 17:33 dholbach 17:33 ack, thanks 17:33 istr he just ran the process for the CC 17:34 ok, so we have a plan now? 17:34 only thing to be sure of is the voters roll 17:34 #action pitti to send out call for nominations to u-d-a@, collect proposals for two weeks, and send to sabdfl 17:34 * meetingology pitti to send out call for nominations to u-d-a@, collect proposals for two weeks, and send to sabdfl 17:34 i'll take nominations by direct email (can be cc'd to TB@ if folks want a nomination on the record) 17:34 sabdfl: ah, you collect the votes? WFM too, then I don't proxy 17:34 pls cc the nominee (and if public pls check with them before nominating them :) 17:34 ack 17:34 i'll double-check with nominees 17:35 and then discuss nominations with current TB, just to give the conspiracy theorists a head start 17:35 then we'll have a shortlist, and a vote, and a TB 17:35 \o/ 17:35 \o/ 17:36 https://launchpad.net/~techboard/+members whee! 17:36 hmm, i might have overclicked - kees is correct yes? 17:36 Yes. 17:36 phew 17:37 But you're missing stgraber. 17:37 otherwise that might have been surprising to him 17:37 reload 17:37 Oh, there he is. I refreshed. 17:37 ;) 17:37 alrighty then 17:37 AOB? 17:37 thanks sabdfl 17:37 #topic AOB 17:37 thanks sabdfl 17:37 I was wondering if the size of the TB is something to discuss for this election too. 17:37 good point 17:37 Namely that, minus sabdfl, who isn't usually present for votes, we are an even number. 17:37 Which is awkward. 17:37 TB tasks have dramatically reduced over the years 17:37 5 might be better than 6. 17:38 sabdfl: ^ 17:39 Not that we often disagree, but if someone poses the right question, it could happen. :P 17:43 infinity: FWIW, +1 from me 17:43 AOB #2? 17:43 I have nothing 17:44 I haven't had breakfast yet, and that's a dire issue. 17:44 (So, no, nothing else) 17:44 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)