16:01 #startmeeting 16:01 Meeting started Tue Sep 29 16:01:39 2015 UTC. The chair is slangasek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:01 16:01 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 16:01 [TOPIC] Apologies 16:02 Adam Conrad sends his regrets 16:02 slacker 16:02 ;) 16:02 is everyone else here? 16:02 stgraber isn't yet 16:02 and kees 16:03 so just the three of us, in fact 16:03 let's overthrow the world! 16:03 [TOPIC] Action review 16:03 * ACTION: slangasek to document maas, juju, docker exceptions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Special_Cases 16:04 carried over, but getting close to the top of my todo list 16:04 (I almost did it before this meeting, but this meeting snuck up faster than expected ;) 16:04 * ACTION: pitti to update SRU policy amendment proposals and gather feedback 16:04 sent two weeks ago; kees sent +1, I haven't heard feedback from Adam 16:05 he said "if you don't hear from me by next meeting, consider it a silent agreement" 16:05 ok 16:06 I did raise the concern about whether we're going to see an increase in volume of requests for this kind of thing 16:07 you said you considered that an "abuse", but to me it looks like a natural outcome of people acting according to the letter of the policy in good faith 16:07 but I don't think we need to block on this 16:07 * ACTION: infinity to review pitti's SRU policy amendments and +1/-1 on-list 16:07 this one is superseded by events, I think? 16:07 if this results in backporting 5 new features every week, it's collectively too much noise/potential instability IMHO 16:08 i. e. if we can't keep up with verifying/reviewing any more 16:08 where "we" == SRU team 16:08 but I think this is a problem which we should address if/when we get it 16:08 in principle the same could happen for bug fixes 16:08 \o 16:08 sorry I'm late! 16:08 and in some cases there are SRUs which are over the top 16:08 hey kees! 16:09 but by and large it seems manageable 16:09 stgraber, kees: hi there! 16:09 slangasek: superseded by events> according to what he told me, yes 16:09 ok 16:09 and we can adjust it further, after all 16:09 [TOPIC] Mailing list archive 16:09 hello, sorry for being late 16:09 so should we go ahead with the SRU policy amendments? 16:10 looks like the discussion was all about SRU policy this month, so that's fine 16:10 [TOPIC] Community bugs 16:10 [LINK] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bugs?field.assignee=techboard 16:10 empty 16:11 [TOPIC] Select a chair for the next meeting 16:11 I believe the rotation is stgraber, with infinity as backup 16:11 ? 16:11 right 16:11 I think so yeah, note that I'll be at a sprint at the time though 16:11 hopefully I won't be double-booked 16:12 [INFO] Next meeting 2015-10-13, 17:00 London time. chair is stgraber, backup chair is infinity 16:12 (hopefully that's right) 16:12 I'll be on holiday, so I won't be attending 16:13 [TOPIC] AOB 16:13 anything else today? 16:13 nothing from me 16:13 nothing from me 16:13 do we need to vote on the SRU policy again, or do we have enough votes on teh ML? 16:14 I got +1 from everyone but Adam now, I think 16:14 I think it's been ratified on the list 16:14 ack 16:14 so I'll update the policy and send it to u-d-a@ 16:15 [ACTION] pitti to update SRU policy wiki page and announce on u-d-a 16:15 * meetingology pitti to update SRU policy wiki page and announce on u-d-a 16:15 yay, a new action ;) 16:15 #endmeeting