16:00 #startmeeting 16:00 Meeting started Tue Jun 23 16:00:58 2015 UTC. The chair is kees. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:00 16:00 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 16:01 [topic] Apologies 16:01 slangasek is out today 16:01 ah, slangasek is on holidays? 16:01 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2015-June/002118.html 16:01 ill 16:01 I was tempted to do the same. 16:01 [topic] Action review 16:02 only thing was for slangasek, so we can defer it 16:02 "ACTION: slangasek to forward complaint to Canonical legal " 16:03 oh, hm, not the right bot commands 16:03 #meetingtopic Apologies 16:03 or... not 16:03 * kees stares at meetingology 16:03 He might not have topic rights on the channel. :P 16:03 #topic Apologies 16:03 BRB, door. 16:04 okay, ignoring the bot... 16:04 #topic Mailing List 16:04 kees: it's with brackets 16:04 kees: [topic] 16:04 Is there anything we need to do from the CC thread? 16:04 mdeslaur: that's what I started with, it didn't respond to that either 16:04 oh, duh, sorry 16:05 I don't think so (CC thread) 16:05 okay, agreed. :) 16:06 #topic Community Bugs 16:06 none! 16:06 Yay, none. 16:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bugs?field.assignee=techboard 16:06 #topic Other Business 16:06 we had an empty agenda. is there anything new to add? 16:06 nothing from me 16:06 I don't have anything 16:07 except perhaps discussing the meeting itself, but I'd rather wait for stgraber and slangasek to be present for that too 16:07 hmm, I'm here :) 16:07 stgraber is here 16:07 (e. g. having meetings on demand, not regularly every other week) 16:07 Probably not the worst plan, but how do we define demand, and who schedules them? 16:08 maybe the chair could update the Agenda to indicate if the meeting should be skipped or something? 16:08 leave it to their discretion until we schedule one? 16:08 so regular schedule but if we don't have anything on the agenda 48h before the meeting we skip it or something? 16:08 I'd rather them be skipped than to have them be scheduled 16:09 If we're doing on demand, probably makes more sense to have a weekly schedule instead of bi-weekly, and an understanding that we're not likely to use them all. 16:09 stgraber: oops, sorry :) 16:09 my experience is that finding a new meeting time is a pain, so probably best to stick with ours and just skip when there's nothing to talk about 16:09 infinity: demand: ML inquiry or something being added to the schedule; then the next Tuesday 16:09 yeah, having a weekly slot would be fine indeed 16:09 right 16:10 but then having a potential meeting every week 16:10 which provides better response time when we do have some agenda, and avoids these null meetings 16:10 I'd rather not have that slot pencilled in every single week 16:10 i'd like to keep it every 2 weeks. we already don't need the meeting very often :) 16:11 currently, handling issues on the ML seems to be more practical anyway 16:11 so we're adding that the chair can email ML and say "meeting skipped" and name the next chair? 16:12 Well, I think if you skip one, you get to be the next chair. :P 16:12 infinity: +1 16:12 yeah, that makes more sense 16:12 i. e. keep chair until the next actual meeting 16:12 yeah, makes sense to me also 16:13 yup 16:13 #resolved chair can announce skipped meetings (due to lack of agenda) on ML and stays chair until next meeting 16:14 the chair may want to harass people about actions, though 16:14 yeah, that could be put into that mail 16:14 cool 16:15 okay! anything else? next chair is slangasek says Agenda. 16:15 right, and then stgraber 16:16 agenda updated. that's it! 16:16 thanks everyone! 16:16 thanks everyone! 16:16 #endmeeting