13:30 <seb128> #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-05-05 13:30 <meetingology> Meeting started Tue May 5 13:30:43 2020 UTC. The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 13:30 <meetingology> 13:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 13:31 <seb128> Roll call: didrocks, duflu (out), heather, jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, marcustomlinson (out), oSoMoN, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), callmepk 13:31 <Trevinho> o/ 13:31 <kenvandine> o/ 13:31 <callmepk> o/ 13:31 <oSoMoN> o/ 13:31 <marcustomlinson> \o 13:31 <hellsworth> o/ 13:31 <Laney> |O| 13:31 <seb128> wooot, let's get started 13:32 <seb128> #topic rls-bb-bug 13:33 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:33 <seb128> no desktop entry 13:33 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:33 <seb128> everything assigned, wooot 13:34 <seb128> I'm going to skip -ee from now on, I don't think it makes sense to accept new things for that serie at this point 13:34 <kenvandine> makes sense 13:34 <seb128> we can still on special cases but probably doesn't need to be in the meeting 13:34 <seb128> #topic rls-ff-bug 13:34 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:35 <seb128> there are some 'noise' item (incomplete/already discussed&assigned), I will skip those 13:35 <seb128> bug #1876891 13:35 <ubot5> bug 1876891 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "The fractional scaling toggle applies instantly and not when "Apply" is pressed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876891 13:36 <seb128> I think it's an issue we should fix but I wouldn't consider it as rls target 13:36 <seb128> it's a pretty specific case to pick a scaled value and then turn scaling off while it's selected 13:37 <seb128> and the impact is limited, scaling is wrong but you still have a display so it's easy enough to change the value in the UI 13:37 <Laney> is it? 13:37 <Laney> pick scaling, decide you don't want it, later want it again 13:37 <seb128> let's say we didn't get any report so far 13:37 <Laney> at that point you get the old value before you picked whatever you want at the new point 13:37 <seb128> I'm not discussing it's a bug, agreed it's not a nice behaviour 13:38 <seb128> it just didn't get reported/mentioned by other users yet and is easy to recover from 13:38 <seb128> anyway, that's my reasoning for giving a -1 13:38 <hellsworth> it seems like it should be fixed but maybe not super urgent 13:38 <seb128> I'm happy to be overulled 13:38 <Laney> here's what I think 13:38 <Laney> it's crap behaviour 13:38 <Trevinho> the problem is that we can't know the actual scaling value before activating it 13:38 <kenvandine> i'd say we want it fixed for .1 13:38 <Laney> and it's crap bugs that *we* introduced in a distro patch 13:38 <Laney> we should have a high bar for quality there 13:38 <Trevinho> so not really possible to do this... The only option is not to scale by default probably 13:39 <Laney> so I think we should be holding ourselves to a high standard here and accepting things like this 13:39 <seb128> Trevinho, well, from the settings the control could be smart enough to change the value to an int one before doing the gsettings toggling 13:39 <hellsworth> Laney makes a good argument.. i'm switching sides 13:40 <seb128> still, we don't have data showing that users noticed/that it's a thing people do 13:40 <Trevinho> seb128: mh, *could* but it goes through the DBusAPI so need to be consequent, so may still cause some visual lag 13:40 <seb128> anyway 13:40 <seb128> vote? 13:40 <seb128> -1 from me 13:40 <kenvandine> +1 from me 13:40 <Trevinho> by default it would pick an integer value though 13:40 <Trevinho> only if the user changed it previously it's a fractional, and imho this is fine 13:41 <hellsworth> +1 13:41 <Trevinho> -1 13:41 <Laney> +1 13:41 <oSoMoN> +1 13:41 <seb128> k, nominating 13:41 <seb128> kenvandine, do you think Robert can take on it since he added the UI? 13:41 <seb128> and it's g-c-c 13:41 <kenvandine> he's got other time sensitive stuff 13:42 <kenvandine> but it might be a quick fix 13:42 <seb128> unsure what would be a nice behaviour there 13:42 <Trevinho> not sure, unless we want 3 clicks to get it active 13:42 <Laney> I don't get why you have to fiddle with the value mutter knows about, it's just not connecting directly to the gsetting 13:42 <seb128> maybe simply disabling the off switch if a scaled value is selected? 13:42 <Trevinho> like -> toggle -> apply -> set scaling -> done 13:42 <Laney> it's completely fine to remember the previous setting, just don't apply it until they press apply 13:43 <Laney> so you can have a chance to change it 13:43 <Trevinho> no way unless we implement changing monitor.xml from g-c-c 13:43 <Trevinho> which isn't something we want 13:43 <seb128> maybe should just disable the toggle if a scaled value is selected? 13:44 <Trevinho> only option is to add other dbus APIs which I decided not to do not to move away from upstream 13:44 <Laney> discuss after 13:44 <seb128> right 13:44 <oSoMoN> yeah 13:44 <Laney> hopefully without the 'no way' kind of things 13:45 <seb128> bug #1876894 13:45 <ubot5> bug 1876894 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Scaling is not reverted properly (appears shrunk) when disabling fractional scaling" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876894 13:45 <seb128> I vote +1 to this one 13:46 <Trevinho> +1 13:46 <hellsworth> +1 13:47 <Trevinho> ah, wait... MIGHT be WONTFIX for some things unfortnuately... as it depends on their toolkits 13:47 <Trevinho> like it's for qt (telegram) and sometimes firefox 13:47 <seb128> hum? 13:47 <Trevinho> same is already when you switch from 100% to 200% 13:47 <seb128> for me it's 13:47 <seb128> start session 13:47 <Laney> it works if you first pick 100% and then press apply 13:47 <seb128> -enable scaling, 125% 13:47 <seb128> disable the key 13:48 <seb128> and g-c-c is underscale 13:48 <seb128> resolution is 3200 in xrandr 13:48 <seb128> instead of 1900 13:48 <seb128> pick 100% and it's fine 13:48 <Trevinho> ah ok, that's fine then. g-c-c issue thouhg. 13:48 <Trevinho> not mutter, I can look at that. 13:49 <seb128> not g-c-c 13:50 <seb128> anyway, let's talk about this after the meeting 13:50 <Trevinho> k 13:50 <RoyK> I have an old laptop that hasn't been update for a while and I wanted to update it now, finding it's running 19.04 and nothing seems to want to update. Do I have to change repos? 13:51 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:51 <seb128> bug #1866088 13:51 <ubot5> bug 1866088 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Focal) "Problems with the Dock setting of "Show on" in the Appearance tab" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866088 13:51 <oSoMoN> RoyK, we're in the middle of a team meeting here, hold on for a few minutes if you don't mind 13:52 <seb128> that's fix commited 13:52 <seb128> assigning to Marco, it's pending review in the focal queue 13:52 <RoyK> oSoMoN: np 13:53 <seb128> bug #1876334 13:53 <ubot5> bug 1876334 in zsys (Ubuntu Focal) "[Focal] zsys does not clear out old snapshots, potentially filling up bpool" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876334 13:55 <seb128> jibel, you nominated that one, should be assigned to you or Didier? 13:56 <seb128> assuming they will :p 13:56 <seb128> #topic rls-gg-bug 13:56 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-gg-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:57 <seb128> no new bug on that list, either discussed or things to clean out as I said earlier 13:57 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-gg-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:57 <seb128> fix commited ones 13:57 <seb128> #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:58 <seb128> Laney, want to do that one or should I? (I review the list earlier so I can do if you are not on top of it atm) 13:58 <seb128> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:58 <Laney> I didn't look, feel free 13:58 <seb128> k 13:58 <seb128> fonts-teluguvijayam: needs a MIR 13:58 <seb128> I will do that, standard/easy font one 13:59 <seb128> some libreoffice issues, hopefully only usual armhf retries, some are queued let's see next week if it's still an issue 13:59 <seb128> libutempter needs investigating, I was going to poke at it 13:59 <seb128> gdk-pixbuf is failing but the tests are new / just been added in Debian 13:59 <seb128> the failures don't happen in Debian thoguh 13:59 <seb128> anyone interested to poke at that? 14:00 <seb128> libsoxr is a bit puzzling, it failed in focal and now again, failing to find pkg-config on i386, but it has one successful try on groovy which I don't explain 14:01 <seb128> it looks like it's not set up for crossbuild, dunno how it worked that one time :/ 14:01 <oSoMoN> gdk-pixbuf: can do once I'm done with the firefox release and other things 14:01 <seb128> oSoMoN, thanks 14:01 <seb128> I will trello cards thing for reminder 14:02 <seb128> libsoxr would be nice to make cross build friendly if anyone want to poke, but meanwhile I mp a hint to reset the result on i386 I think 14:02 <seb128> it's not a regression 14:02 <seb128> a 14:02 <seb128> and that's it for proposed migration 14:02 <seb128> #topic AOB 14:02 <seb128> any other topic? 14:03 <Laney> some items were mentioned on one of the incoming lists which we keep skipping 14:03 <Laney> anything we can do to get those off? 14:05 <seb128> yes, I will get them off for next week, I had delayed assuming the .2 upload would clear off the list for us 14:05 <seb128> but that is taking time, we should probably just accept nomination for things pending upload to get them off the list 14:05 <Laney> cool thanks! 14:06 <seb128> np! 14:06 <Laney> yeah I usually nominate and assign when uploading SRUs 14:06 <Laney> for all the bugs fixed in that 14:06 <seb128> right 14:06 <seb128> thanks for pointing it out :) 14:06 <seb128> anything else? 14:06 <Laney> not from me 14:07 <seb128> (sorry, got some ping/side discussion going which created a bit of delay on the meeting) 14:07 <seb128> thanks everyone! 14:07 <seb128> #endmeeting