14:30 <kenvandine> #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-02-11
14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Feb 11 14:30:07 2020 UTC.  The chair is kenvandine. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
14:30 <meetingology> 
14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
14:30 <kenvandine> Roll call:  didrocks, duflu (out), jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney (out), marcustomlinson, oSoMoN, seb128 (out), tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), Wimpress (out), hellsworth
14:30 <marcustomlinson> \o
14:30 <hellsworth> o/
14:30 <kenvandine> oh, i'm not sure if seb128 is out :)
14:31 <oSoMoN> o/
14:31 <jibel> he is
14:31 <didrocks> hey
14:31 <kenvandine> ok
14:31 <marcustomlinson> meanwhile seb128 watches from the bushes fighting the urge to speak and give away his location
14:31 <kenvandine> :)
14:33 <kenvandine> let's get started
14:33 <kenvandine> #topic rls-ff-bugs
14:33 <kenvandine> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html
14:34 <kenvandine> oh weird... i can't open the bug links in firefox
14:34 <kenvandine> i get a dialog asking to download it
14:35 <oSoMoN> file a bug :)
14:35 <hellsworth> :)
14:35 <marcustomlinson> I see a lot of duflu on those open bugs
14:36 <kenvandine> restarting the browser fixed it
14:36 <oSoMoN> turning it off and on again…
14:36 <kenvandine> yeah, lots of duflu
14:38 <marcustomlinson> oh I see, these are mostly champagne additions
14:38 <marcustomlinson> all actually
14:38 <Laney> Daniel seems to be adding champagne to lots of bugs
14:38 <Laney> not sure that's how this is supposed to work
14:39 <kenvandine> indeed
14:39 <Laney> de-tag those and follow up with a mail to the team(s) explaining it?
14:41 <kenvandine> it might still follow the spirit of champagne
14:41 <kenvandine> let's discuss this again in the leads meeting
14:41 <kenvandine> before de-tagging
14:42 <Laney> seriously hope it doesn't
14:43 <kenvandine> well, these could have been tagged by finding the same issue and tagging the existing bug instead of filing new
14:44 <kenvandine> looks like tracking is fine
14:45 <kenvandine> moving on
14:45 <kenvandine> #topic rls-ee-bugs
14:45 <kenvandine> nothing desktop in incoming
14:46 <kenvandine> bug 1853768 is in tracking but not assigned
14:46 <ubot5> bug 1853768 in yaru-theme (Ubuntu Eoan) "Qt apps, like kid3-qt, which uses legacy icons "document-*.png", show them as normal document icon under Yaru theme" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853768
14:47 <hellsworth> says its fixed in focal
14:47 <kenvandine> yeah, but eoan needs the SRU
14:48 <kenvandine> that's the only one not assigned
14:48 <kenvandine> besides the NM bug
14:50 <RikMills> Trevinho: https://code.launchpad.net/~rikmills/unity/+git/unity/+merge/378891
14:50 <mitya57> kenvandine: I wanted to take care of SRUing it, but I'm waiting for the current yaru-theme in eoan-proposed to migrate.
14:50 <kenvandine> mitya57: can we assign it to you?
14:50 <mitya57> Yes
14:50 <kenvandine> thanks
14:50 <kenvandine> moving on
14:51 <kenvandine> #topic rls-bb-bugs
14:51 <kenvandine> nothing for desktop incoming
14:52 <kenvandine> only un-assigned bugs in tracking are NM
14:52 <kenvandine> #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages
14:52 <kenvandine> Laney: you're up
14:53 <Laney> Don't have super much to say, could someone take a look at the regressions underneath gobject-introspection maybe?
14:55 <Laney> and there's a libreoffice regression noted there, not sure if that's something to be concerned with
14:55 <Laney> otherwise python3-defaults is making it look sad but that's not on us to handle
14:55 <hellsworth> marcustomlinson: libreoffice shouldn't be blocking python3 anymore since the LO ubuntu4 deb is in proposed?
14:55 <marcustomlinson> yeah fingers crossed that'll be sorted out soon
14:55 <marcustomlinson> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libreoffice
14:55 <marcustomlinson> tests running
14:56 <kenvandine> no volunteers for gobject-introspection?
14:57 <marcustomlinson> here's a rubbish suggestion, how about we just hit retry on all the failures
14:57 * marcustomlinson runs away
14:58 * marcustomlinson is sort of serious though
14:58 <hellsworth> i'm full with LO and gnome snapcraft extension
14:58 <hellsworth> i wish i could help but i'm already trying not to drown
14:58 <kenvandine> ok, moving on
14:58 <kenvandine> #topic aob
14:59 <hellsworth> nothing from me
15:00 <Laney> gnome updates
15:01 <Laney> it would be good if people could volunteer to do a couple of these to spread it around a bit
15:01 <kenvandine> i guess we didn't make good progress since last week?
15:02 <Laney> https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/versions.html not really
15:02 <hellsworth> Laney what has to be done with these to update them?
15:04 <Laney> wrangling the packaging
15:04 <hellsworth> i need more specifics
15:04 <hellsworth> i see libreoffice in that list. what do i need to do to that to "wrangle the packaging"
15:04 <Laney> yeah sorry, but it's hard to be specific
15:04 <oSoMoN> I'm late on feature work and trying to stay afloat, but I'll make some room for some updates this week
15:05 <Laney> basically get the package, check what changed between the version we have and the new one, and adjust accordingly
15:05 <Laney> adding / updating build-dependencies, stuff like that
15:05 <Laney> https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/gnome.html maybe that's a better one to look at
15:05 <hellsworth> is there any documentation on this process?
15:05 <oSoMoN> dropping or rebasing ubuntu-specific patches on top of upstream/debian
15:05 <marcustomlinson> hellsworth: we don't follow rc releases from Debian in libreoffice, so ignore it
15:06 <hellsworth> oooh these packages are out of date with respect to debian and you're asking for them to be updated
15:06 <Laney> the high level goal is to get gnome 3.35.90 into focal
15:07 <kenvandine> debian or upstream
15:07 <kenvandine> working towards the gnome RC
15:07 <hellsworth> all of these packages have gnome 3.35.90 in the debian or upstream package?
15:07 <Laney> there's some documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git https://wiki.debian.org/Gnome/Git https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/
15:08 <hellsworth> Laney: thanks but i think i understand now
15:08 <kenvandine> ok, moving on
15:08 <Laney> usually it's us (& endless folks, & some others) who do the update in Debian too
15:08 <kenvandine> any more aob?
15:09 <Laney> (thanks oSoMoN!)
15:09 <hellsworth> i'll try updating one sometime in the near future
15:09 <kenvandine> well that's a wrap
15:09 <kenvandine> #endmeeting