== Meeting information ==
 * #ubuntu-touch-meeting: Docviewer meeting, 09 Oct at 15:02 — 15:35 UTC
 * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-touch-meeting/2015/ubuntu-touch-meeting.2015-10-09-15.02.log.html]]



== Meeting summary ==

''LINK:'' http://paste.ubuntu.com/12724173/ 



== Vote results ==




== Done items ==

 * (none)



== People present (lines said) ==

 * popey (34)
 * sverzegnassi (30)
 * mrqtros (4)
 * meetingology (3)



== Full Log ==


 15:02 <popey> #startmeeting Docviewer meeting

 15:02 <meetingology> Meeting started Fri Oct  9 15:02:00 2015 UTC.  The chair is popey. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.

 15:02 <meetingology> 

 15:02 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick

 15:02 <popey> heya sverzegnassi

 15:02 <sverzegnassi> hi popey! how are you?

 15:02 <popey> Great thanks

 15:03 <popey> So today I've been playing with building docviewer on my laptop but been having trouble just building a click

 15:03 <popey> I think I missed a step

 15:03 <popey> http://paste.ubuntu.com/12724173/

 15:04 <popey> thats at the end of doing a click-buddy --dir foo/

 15:04 <sverzegnassi> is that from https://code.launchpad.net/~popey/+junk/docviewer_build ?

 15:04 <popey> no, a different branch, should I use that one?

 15:04 <popey> its from the get-click-deps one

 15:05 <sverzegnassi> i was asking because of the name of the tmp dir

 15:07 <sverzegnassi> in your output I see that CMake is trying to read a different tmp folder

 15:07 <popey> huh.

 15:07 <sverzegnassi> 7SndWsrjSX vs fbIMltI9hG

 15:08 <sverzegnassi> is there a earlier build still cached?

 15:08 <popey> hm, I don't think so.

 15:09 <popey> well, there's two tmps isn't there, one that we are building in, and one that libreoffice is unpacked in

 15:10 <sverzegnassi> huh, ok. if you can push the code somewhere I'll have a look at it later

 15:11 <popey> okay.

 15:11 <popey> I don't think we have much to discuss other than getting that build working, which I will do offline.

 15:11 <popey> well, after my meetings :)

 15:11 <sverzegnassi> There's a few things, to be honest :P

 15:11 <sverzegnassi> 1) https://code.launchpad.net/~mrqtros/ubuntu-docviewer-app/reboot-qsg-impress-support

 15:12 <sverzegnassi> mrqtros did an excellent work with it :D

 15:12 <mrqtros> Hi all

 15:12 <mrqtros> sorry I am late as always))

 15:12 <popey> oooh!

 15:12 <popey> Hey mrqtros !

 15:13 <sverzegnassi> o/

 15:13 <mrqtros> I can't help with click building - absolutely out of information about this)

 15:13 <popey> no worries mrqtros, I just need to find some uninterrupted time to fix it

 15:14 <sverzegnassi> 2) We should delete the grid view mode in docviewer.

 15:14 <sverzegnassi> (or don't use UITK1.2 ListItem at all)

 15:15 <popey> Aw, I liked the grid view

 15:15 <sverzegnassi> I'm having hard times to port docviewer to latest UITK 1.2.

 15:15 <mrqtros> I liked too

 15:15 <sverzegnassi> We currently provide multi selection for both grid and list view

 15:16 <sverzegnassi> The new ListItem provides some cool things that make easier to handle such thing

 15:16 <popey> If we need to simplify the interface to move forward to the new listitem, so be it.

 15:16 <sverzegnassi> The problem is that it breaks the compatibility with the older multi selection code.

 15:17 <sverzegnassi> and we can't use the same code for both views anymore

 15:17 <popey> Ok, I'm fine with it tbh.

 15:18 <sverzegnassi> As a temporary solution I'm fine too... I'd like to see in future something similar to the ListItem also for GridView

 15:18 <sverzegnassi> (also, some UX guidelines for grid of items)

 15:18 <popey> Yeah, once we get some design resource we can come back to it?

 15:21 <sverzegnassi> only if we can use the same apis for both modes imho

 15:22 <sverzegnassi> for the moment I don't want to spend my time on it (there's other tasks that needs to be completed)

 15:22 <sverzegnassi> let's see for the uitk1.3 transition

 15:22 <popey> Yup, agreed.

 15:24 <sverzegnassi> 3) yesterday, discussing with mrqtros, we both said that we're missing a design team member in the meeting, as we had before moving it to friday.

 15:24 <sverzegnassi> that was useful for fixing small design issue faster

 15:25 <popey> Yes, james has a long meeting right at this time so can't attend

 15:25 <popey> if we could move the meeting then we could probably get some time from him

 15:26 <sverzegnassi> yeah, I don't remember the reason why we moved it, but if it's ok, it would be great to have it another day

 15:27 <popey> How about 1 hour earlier, so 14:00 UTC, and Thursday?

 15:27 <popey> ( I know James is around on Thursdays )

 15:28 <sverzegnassi> that's the time we used to have it... isn't it?

 15:28 <sverzegnassi> it would be okay to me

 15:28 <popey> I think so.

 15:28 <popey> How about you mrqtros ?

 15:28 <popey> is 14:00 UTC Thursday possible for you?

 15:32 <popey> Ok, did you have anything else sverzegnassi ?

 15:34 <sverzegnassi> no, i will go on with uitk1.2 porting, last session storing and trying to make lo work on device

 15:34 <popey> Ok. I'll let you know what progress I make.

 15:34 <sverzegnassi> thanks!

 15:35 <popey> Have a great weekend

 15:35 <popey> #endmeeting



Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)