== Meeting information ==
 * #ubuntu-touch-meeting: Docviewer meeting, 16 Apr at 14:00 — 14:43 UTC
 * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-touch-meeting/2015/ubuntu-touch-meeting.2015-04-16-14.00.log.html]]



== Meeting summary ==

''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-docviewer-app/+bug/1428040 
''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-docviewer-app/+bug/1418652 



== Vote results ==




== Done items ==

 * (none)



== People present (lines said) ==

 * popey (40)
 * sverzegnassi (27)
 * kenvandine (19)
 * balloons (3)
 * meetingology (3)



== Full Log ==


 14:00 <popey> #startmeeting Docviewer meeting

 14:00 <meetingology> Meeting started Thu Apr 16 14:00:12 2015 UTC.  The chair is popey. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.

 14:00 <meetingology> 

 14:00 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick

 14:00 <popey> How are you?

 14:00 <sverzegnassi> a bit of allergy, but is ok!

 14:01 <popey> Aww

 14:01 <popey> Stay indoors! Don't go out into the big blue room!

 14:01 <popey> Too many plants (and zombies) out there!

 14:01 <popey> I have a couple of pieces of news.

 14:02 <popey> 1. JMulholland (who is afk in another meeting) is a UX designer in Canonical and is assigned to core apps.

 14:02 <popey> So, if you have any design bugs / issues, add a task for "ubuntu-ux" and we can ping him for feedback.

 14:03 <sverzegnassi> that's great!

 14:03 <popey> Yeah!

 14:03 <popey> So feel free to throw things at him.

 14:03 <sverzegnassi> haha, I'll do

 14:03 <popey> 2. I've asked for us to re-evaluate going in the default image again.

 14:04 <sverzegnassi> when will we get a response?

 14:04 <popey> Well.

 14:04 <popey> Two things need to happen, QA review.

 14:04 <popey> And review from product management

 14:04 <popey> now, I wanted to check with you first

 14:05 <popey> to see if there's anything you wanted to land before we do that?

 14:05 <popey> Or should we do the review now, and see what feedback we get?

 14:05 <sverzegnassi> heh, there are 5 branches atm that should be merged before any review

 14:06 <popey> Good, glad I asked :)

 14:06 <sverzegnassi> I've spent this week (and i'd like to spend the next one too) in fixing all the small things in the code

 14:06 <popey> the store currently has r121

 14:06 <popey> Ok.

 14:07 <popey> There will be an OTA going out later today, to the base image. The next OTA will almost 99.9% be vivid based.

 14:07 <popey> (just in case you were considering anything that required vivid)

 14:07 <sverzegnassi> no, atm there's nothing that requires vivid

 14:08 <popey> ok.

 14:09 <popey> So I will wait to submit for review.

 14:09 <sverzegnassi> yeah, i think that we could wait for the next meeting

 14:11 <popey> Ok. Good.

 14:11 <popey> Ok, anything specific we need to discuss?

 14:11 <sverzegnassi> I'd need to ask to kenvandine a thing about content-hub

 14:12 <sverzegnassi> Is it possible to use a ContentPeerPicker together with a C++ importer?

 14:12 <sverzegnassi> I tried and it works, but the ContentPeerPicker shows docviewer itself as source

 14:14 * popey pokes kenvandine

 14:14 <kenvandine> i don't think we want to encourage the use of the c++ API

 14:14 <kenvandine> it could require app rebuilds, etc

 14:15 <sverzegnassi> oops... in docviewer we already use it

 14:15 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, do you need the c++ api?

 14:15 <kenvandine> i'd rather you importer use QML then hand it off to your own c++ binding to deal with files

 14:15 <kenvandine> s/you/your

 14:16 <sverzegnassi> heh, i had to do a massive refactor of the code, and there are some issue while handling command-line arguments

 14:17 <sverzegnassi> the fastest solution was to reuse part of the code of the gallery-app

 14:18 <sverzegnassi> *there was

 14:18 <kenvandine> ah

 14:18 <kenvandine> i think they've porter gallery-app to use the QML api :)

 14:18 <kenvandine> gallery-app using the c++ API is one of the reasons we decided not to support that api for click apps

 14:19 <kenvandine> s/porter/ported/

 14:20 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, also note the QML api has some conveniences that the c++ doesn't have

 14:21 <sverzegnassi> ok, so in a short future should we revert using QML API? I mean, I seriously prefer C++ API than QML one

 14:23 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, i'd really prefer it, and i think you'd be better off

 14:24 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, it was pretty painful for gallery-app

 14:24 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, the c++ isn't defined as part of the platform, so not a guaranteed API

 14:25 <sverzegnassi> ok, I don't know much of the gallery-app story, so I need to trust you :)

 14:25 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, btw, there is a bug filed to prevent the peer picker from showing itself

 14:26 <sverzegnassi> no, I was just testing on a local branch on my PC, i did not file any bug yet

 14:26 <kenvandine> there is a bug filed already

 14:26 <sverzegnassi> huh, ok :P

 14:27 <kenvandine> about the peer picker showing the current running app in the peer model

 14:27 <kenvandine> it should be filtered out

 14:27 <kenvandine> you don't want to import from yourself :)

 14:28 <sverzegnassi> I'll do, thank you for the answers! :D

 14:29 <kenvandine> sverzegnassi, anytime!

 14:29 <popey> Thanks kenvandine :)

 14:29 <popey> sverzegnassi: anything else?

 14:30 <sverzegnassi> yes, I have one question. What about autopilot/unit tests? I mean, when we will get a QA review, what will happen with the missing autopilot tests?

 14:31 <popey> Well, we should have some.

 14:31 <popey> Obviously :)

 14:31 <popey> We should file a bug for each test we need, and ask experts (like carla) if they can help write them

 14:32 <balloons> sverzegnassi, did you need / wish for someone to have a look at the test suite you have or ?

 14:32 <popey> not having tests is bad, but having them and them failing is worse

 14:32 <sverzegnassi> ballons, these should have a priority on others we have in the list:

 14:32 <sverzegnassi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-docviewer-app/+bug/1428040

 14:33 <sverzegnassi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-docviewer-app/+bug/1418652

 14:34 <sverzegnassi> anyway yes, if someone could have a look on it it would be great!

 14:39 <popey> balloons: we're looking to include docviewer in the image, so makes sense for us to have some tests :)

 14:41 <balloons> of course! Let's see if we can round up a volunteer to work with you

 14:41 <popey> \o/

 14:41 <popey> thanks balloons

 14:41 <balloons> I'll send along those 2 bugs as priority

 14:41 <popey> sverzegnassi: I'll keep an eye out for more merges, and manually test accordingly.

 14:42 <sverzegnassi> thank you balloons!

 14:42 <sverzegnassi> popey, thanks!

 14:43 <popey> Ok, lets wrap.

 14:43 <popey> have a good weekend sverzegnassi

 14:43 <popey> #endmeeting



Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)