16:00 <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
16:00 <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:00:20 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
16:00 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
16:00 <ginggs> o/
16:01 <bdrung> \o
16:01 <dviererbe> Hello!
16:01 <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-23-february-2023/34122
16:01 <jawn-smith> Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions
16:01 <ogayot> o/
16:04 <bdmurray> What are these tzdata uploads?
16:05 <bdmurray> Also there was a card about separating ICU data from tzdata.
16:05 <bdrung> bdmurray, see https://launchpad.net/bugs/2008076 and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2023-January/042405.html
16:08 <zhsj> i've a remaining question when fix bug 2002871, shall we hack debhelper/dpkg right now or we can wait some time to see if launchpad-buildd can be changed.
16:11 <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
16:11 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:11 <jawn-smith> oh before we get on with this does anyone have an answer for zhsj ?
16:14 <waveform> still reading the backlog on that one
16:15 <bdmurray> waveform: could you comment on the bug after you are done reading?
16:15 <waveform> will do
16:15 <jawn-smith> Okay great so we have someone looking into that
16:15 <jawn-smith> moving on to bugs
16:16 <jawn-smith> bug 2003331
16:16 <bdrung> after reading the bug comments, I would say that we should wait for launchpad-buildd to be fixed (instead of patching debhelper)
16:16 <jawn-smith> This is with desktop IIRC, so let's move on
16:16 <jawn-smith> bug 2008142
16:16 <bdmurray> I wasn't sure if this was a subiquity bug or an ubuntu-desktop-installer issue. dbungert?
16:17 <dbungert> there may be something specific to desktop here, I'm pretty sure I have hardare that uses this driver and works with live-server
16:17 <dbungert> I'll retry that real hardware and go from there
16:18 <dbungert> desktop does do network handling differently and I'm concerned that this is affected
16:18 <bdmurray> I thought I'd seen the driver was on the image though
16:19 <dbungert> I don't think this is a pool problem, the subiquity network controller has some magic for wireless and I wonder if that does the right thing for desktop
16:19 <bdmurray> Checking ./pool/restricted/b/broadcom-sta/broadcom-sta-dkms_6.30.223.271-23ubuntu1_all.deb
16:20 <jawn-smith> Sounds like dbungert will be investigating this
16:20 <jawn-smith> so we'll remove the incoming tag and add a foundations-todo tag
16:21 <jawn-smith> kk is empty again, hooray
16:21 <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
16:21 <jawn-smith> bug 1063589
16:22 <jawn-smith> bdmurray: you looked into this right?
16:22 <bdmurray> I looked for aptdaemon bugs similar to this and found none
16:22 <bdmurray> Having said that I think this still needs fixing given the quantity of duplicates in the Error Tracker
16:23 <jawn-smith> Okay any volunteers to look into fixing this?
16:23 <bdmurray> Looking again it only has hundreds of duplicates
16:24 <bdmurray> So maybe it isn't founations-todo but a someday maybe
16:24 <jawn-smith> Okay so let's remove the tag and subscribe foundations bugs
16:24 <jawn-smith> Thanks bdmurray
16:24 <jawn-smith> bug 1999345
16:24 <jawn-smith> juliank: still with security?
16:25 <juliank> yeah
16:25 <jawn-smith> That was easy then
16:25 <jawn-smith> not many real bugs today
16:25 <jawn-smith> #topic proposed-migration
16:26 <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
16:26 <jawn-smith> libarchive was with me but I'm pretty stuck
16:26 <jawn-smith> Anyone else want to take a look at this? It's a weirdly repeatable broken pipe error
16:26 <schopin> jawn-smith: I'll take over
16:27 <jawn-smith> Thanks! When you figure it out can you let me know what it was?
16:27 <schopin> s/When/If
16:27 <jawn-smith> I have faith in you
16:27 <jawn-smith> licensecheck was waiting on an MIR
16:28 <jawn-smith> adrien: you were working that right?
16:29 <jawn-smith> sbuild was waveform right?
16:29 <waveform> yup, haven't looked at it since last week though
16:29 <adrien> licensecheck MIR in review since yesterday
16:30 <waveform> will try and take another look this week
16:30 <jawn-smith> Thanks!
16:30 <jawn-smith> cryptsetup
16:30 <bdrung> o/
16:31 <jawn-smith> Thanks bdrung
16:31 <jawn-smith> lsb-release-minimal
16:31 <jawn-smith> waveform: you said there was nothing to do for this right?
16:31 <jawn-smith> Just waiting on queues?
16:31 <waveform> that was also with me; the apt-clone part is resolved and I think the zfs-linux test just needs re-kicking
16:32 <jawn-smith> Okay I'll trigger that one
16:33 <jawn-smith> done
16:33 <jawn-smith> I'll look into icu since I uploaded it
16:33 <juliank> icu see ubuntu-release
16:34 <juliank> the boost failures are not failures, boost has been set to not run, so it needs to be force-badtested accordingly (#ubuntu-release)
16:34 <jawn-smith> Indeed, but I believe I should prove that the tests pass in canonistack or on a raspi
16:35 <jawn-smith> before asking release to hint
16:35 <juliank> why?
16:35 <juliank> Either we run the tests or we don't run them
16:35 <jawn-smith> Cause bdmurray said so
16:35 <juliank> Why do we disable boost tests on autopkgtest.u.c and run them manually?
16:37 <bdmurray> Because there are issues booting arm64 instances and some package's tests require multiple instances and eventually one fails to boot.
16:37 <juliank> Someone's gonna rerun it with migration-reference/0 and then it's alwaysfail anyhow
16:37 <bdmurray> Subsequently the pragmatic thing to do seemed to me to continue working on other things in the queue and coming back
16:38 <ginggs> boost and dgit and friends have many many tests defined in debian/tests/control
16:41 <jawn-smith> We're going to pester v_orlon to see if he has better ideas
16:42 <jawn-smith> Skipping glibc as we're just waiting on a bunch of things
16:43 <jawn-smith> python-3.10 is going to be removed soon so ignoring that
16:43 <jawn-smith> libgd2
16:44 <jawn-smith> was anyone looking into this?
16:44 <ginggs> danilo was looking
16:44 <ginggs> i retried some tests and they have just passed
16:45 <jawn-smith> cool thanks
16:45 <jawn-smith> looks like the next valid one is openjdk-lts blocking harfbuzz
16:45 <jawn-smith> Let's assign that to vpa1977
16:46 <jawn-smith> Then devscripts has some issues
16:46 <jawn-smith> Any volunteers for devscripts?
16:46 <slyon> I can
16:46 <ginggs> is there an mir process for the new dependencies of devscripts?
16:46 <jawn-smith> Thanks slyon
16:46 <jawn-smith> I think someone was working on that MIR, yes
16:47 <slyon> yes it's done
16:47 <slyon> pending MIR review
16:47 <adrien> there are several ones if I'm not mistaken and they are assigned
16:47 <ginggs> ah yes, the excuses bugs
16:47 <adrien> :)
16:47 <jawn-smith> alright great
16:47 <jawn-smith> libio-socket-ssl-perl
16:47 <jawn-smith> any takers?
16:47 <jawn-smith> some of these failures are on architectures with their queues in good shape
16:48 <jawn-smith> enr0n: libio-socket-ssl-perl
16:48 <jawn-smith> ogayot: m4 ?
16:48 <enr0n> jawn-smith: ack
16:48 <ogayot> jawn-smith: ack
16:48 <ginggs> i'll take pillow
16:49 <jawn-smith> adrien: pillow ?
16:49 <jawn-smith> oh sorry ginggs
16:49 <jawn-smith> adrien: tcl8.6
16:49 <adrien> ok
16:49 <jawn-smith> dbungert: want to start chipping away at the lsb regressions?
16:50 <dbungert> jawn-smith: ack
16:50 <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: want to share lsb with dbungert ?
16:51 <danilogondolfo> sure
16:51 <jawn-smith> gsasl blocking dovecot
16:51 <jawn-smith> looks like just needs a retry
16:51 <jawn-smith> will wait for queues
16:51 <jawn-smith> openjdk-17 is with vpa1977
16:53 <jawn-smith> dviererbe: can you look into libhtml-parser-perl ?
16:53 <jawn-smith> Anyone want to look into fakeroot?
16:54 <zhsj> i will
16:54 <jawn-smith> Thanks!
16:54 <jawn-smith> zhsj: are you also looking at golang-defaults?
16:54 <jawn-smith> or would you like me to?
16:54 <zhsj> yes, they are just waiting the queue
16:54 <jawn-smith> xypron: libcap2 ?
16:54 <jawn-smith> great, thanks zhsj
16:55 <xypron> ok
16:55 <jawn-smith> Thanks!
16:55 <jawn-smith> oh apparently that's with danilogondolfo
16:56 <jawn-smith> Is anyone already looking into pkg-js-tools vs dpkg?
16:56 <dbungert> danilogondolfo: I'm going to run some retests related to lsb and then we can split the rest
16:56 <danilogondolfo> right, thanks
16:56 <juliank> give me
16:56 <dviererbe> Sorry forgot to write here that I will look into libhtml-parser-perl
16:57 <jawn-smith> xypron: can you start looking into sphinx-rtd-theme instead? There are a bunch so no need to get them all done this week
16:57 <xypron> fine
16:57 <jawn-smith> Everyone has one then
16:57 <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
16:57 <jawn-smith> I'm out most of next week
16:59 <danilogondolfo> I still looking for sponsoring for a merge :P https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/2008123
17:00 <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: I will try to take a look today
17:00 <jawn-smith> also danilogondolfo I have a new raspi desktop image to test if you have time
17:01 <danilogondolfo> thanks so much
17:01 <jawn-smith> Should be at the same link you used before
17:01 <danilogondolfo> yeah, sure
17:01 <jawn-smith> I think waveform is also going to do some testing
17:02 <jawn-smith> #endmeeting