#title #ubuntu-meeting Meeting Meeting started by Daviey at 16:03:40 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-09-11-16.03.log.html . == Meeting summary == *Review ACTION points from previous meeting *Quantal Development ''LINK:'' http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html (jamespage, 16:06:46) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-qa (smoser, 16:15:50) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-juju-charm-best-practices (smoser, 16:20:09) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-arm-deployment (smoser, 16:21:23) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-folsom (smoser, 16:22:56) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-stable (smoser, 16:24:29) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review (smoser, 16:25:14) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-bug-triage-review (smoser, 16:26:41) ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-maas-next-steps (smoser, 16:28:03) *Ubuntu Server Team Events *Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) *Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb) *Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak) ''LINK:'' https://launchpad.net/~dannf/+archive/qemu-highbank/+packages (smoser, 16:44:07) *Open Discussion *Announce next meeting date and time Meeting ended at 16:51:41 UTC. == Votes == == Action items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * smoser (70) * Daviey (68) * jamespage (32) * SpamapS (19) * ubottu (7) * adam_g (7) * zul (6) * arosales (6) * ogra_ (4) * roaksoax (3) * meetingology (3) * skaet (1) * jimbaker (1) == Full Log == 16:03:40 #startmeeting 16:03:40 Meeting started Tue Sep 11 16:03:40 2012 UTC. The chair is Daviey. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:03:40 16:03:40 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 16:04:00 #TOPIC Review ACTION points from previous meeting 16:04:07 smoser follow up on bug 1028453 16:04:09 Launchpad bug 1028453 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "Quantal Ubuntu Server minimal install oversized" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1028453 16:04:19 fixed 16:04:26 super 16:04:26 \o/ 16:04:36 jamespage to look into aligning release team and server team trackign reports 16:04:38 woot 16:04:57 :) 16:05:17 Mr Page? 16:05:20 still thinking about that one - I think we should probably just use the release team report - but it lacks MIR and other team tracking 16:05:28 c/f 16:05:47 jamespage: OK, i missed this action. Can we organise an audio chat with interetsed people to gauge outcomes? 16:06:01 sure 16:06:04 #TOPIC Quantal Development 16:06:22 jamespage or smoser, want to take release-bugs.html? 16:06:32 o. 16:06:35 ill do it 16:06:46 http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html 16:07:05 only a few things on this report now. 16:07:15 bug 1024326 16:07:17 Launchpad bug 1024326 in horizon (Ubuntu) "node.js is required for access to the dashboard" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1024326 16:07:35 i committed a new fix for that last night. much simpler and cleaner 16:07:58 so, with the next upload it should be fixed. i'd like to find a way to integrate the build steps into package build, tho 16:08:07 adam_g, link? 16:08:23 ah. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing/horizon/precise-folsom-proposed/revision/103 16:08:52 hi ho 16:08:58 jamespage: is the breadth of the report accurate, i haven't added anything myself for ages 16:09:14 see action above about release tracking bugs 16:09:36 hallyn: bug 1040033 16:09:37 Launchpad bug 1040033 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Quantal) "Fresh VM installs via preseeded oneiric isos sometimes fail with filesystem issues" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1040033 16:10:18 ah - I see last comment says HEAD fixes stuff - guess you just need to narrow things down 16:10:27 and from http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-q-tracking-bug-tasks.html 16:11:19 ivoks has a really old bug assigned - bug 671065 16:11:20 Launchpad bug 671065 in dovecot (Ubuntu Quantal) "deliver broken because dovecot.conf uses !include_try" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/671065 16:11:41 hmm - not in channel - I'll followup - need to pester him for test cases anyway 16:12:20 we have a load of undecided bugs for maas and juju - which at least need a priority setting. 16:12:58 my recommendation would be to drop the quantal tasks for the time being; that way the bug stays around - but we are not commiting to fix it for quantal unless we raise the tasks.... 16:13:35 smoser, can you and roaksoax review the maas ones - I'll pickup the juju ones with SpamapS 16:13:45 ... 16:13:51 thats be done on release bugs.... 16:14:01 of note anyway :-) 16:14:02 super 16:14:12 any extra ones that should be added? 16:14:19 jamespage, will do. 16:14:30 ok 16:14:40 smoser: do you want to go through http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/group/topic-quantal-servercloud-overview.html ? 16:14:47 fwiw, i think we have been doing a good effort on closing out the juju bugs, led by SpamapS 16:15:15 jimbaker, +1 to that - there are just alot hanging around from last cycles MIR review 16:15:36 sure. i'll go through. 16:15:50 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-qa 16:16:00 i'll just hit red ones. 16:16:01 jamespage, ? 16:16:27 ? 16:16:39 any comment on servercloud-q-opensetack-qa 16:16:41 is zul on point for servercloud-q-openstack-qa 16:16:46 ah. sorry. zul 16:16:47 yep 16:16:49 :-) 16:16:53 dah 16:16:55 yes. i see that. thakn you arosales 16:17:12 zul is acridness to the WI, but in reality jamespage and adam_g have had a significant influence 16:17:48 err, "according to"* .. damn dictionary 16:17:54 i had to look up that word 16:17:59 fun... well anyone want to talk to that ? 16:18:00 its behind. 16:18:27 primarily, reporting on upsteam gerrit.. pre-merge.. adam_g / jamespage ? 16:19:02 I'll have to defer to adam_g - my involvement this cycle has been mainly doing password resets for zul 16:19:17 ok. 16:19:19 lets move on. 16:19:30 adam_g, zul, please take al ook at that today. 16:19:33 Daviey: i have the majority of htat that work done 16:19:34 talk amoungst yourselves. 16:19:46 just need to implement it live on the cluster. was preparing to do that a few weeks ago when i was hijacked with other things 16:20:09 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-juju-charm-best-practices 16:20:33 that seems more SpamapS per this group 16:20:48 i belive there is more progress there than shown 16:21:23 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-arm-deployment 16:21:37 i'll speak for rbasak on that. he has made considerable progress on it. 16:21:46 and the work remaining seems to be known 16:22:12 smoser: I'd have to poll everybody listed there. but in general that effort has been going slower than expected 16:22:36 SpamapS, thank you 16:22:52 please do try to get it into some sort of more current state (if that includes POSTPONE) 16:22:56 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-folsom 16:23:04 I'll poke a few of them though, I see a coupel WI's that have been half-done for a while 16:23:07 zul, you're most of those. ddoes that look reasonable? 16:23:13 * smoser will get my 2 updated on that. 16:23:34 yeah more of it will be "DONE" as we get cloesr to release 16:23:52 i'll poke around, but my feeling is public glance is POSTPONED 16:23:53 zul: when will nova for folsom for example, be marked DONE? 16:24:04 smoser: lets discuss that after 16:24:29 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-stable 16:24:40 zul? 16:24:53 ill update the spec 16:25:14 gracias 16:25:14 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review 16:25:25 there are a bunch of people listed on tasks there, but jamespage name on the item. 16:25:33 smoser, that should catchup this week 16:25:47 I'm gonna pester jibel about upgrade testing.... and ivoks for mail stuff 16:26:10 roaksoax, i'm assuming that powernap needs to go to POSTPONED 16:26:40 i'll follow up with roaksoax 16:26:41 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-bug-triage-review 16:27:14 Ursinha: ^ ? 16:27:16 jamespage, ^ you again 16:27:20 or Ursinha 16:27:32 James page is all done on that blueprint. 16:27:48 yeah - again I'll followup with Ursinha (I keep forgetting and its my blueprint) 16:27:52 k. moving on. 16:28:03 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-maas-next-steps 16:28:07 roaksoax, ^ ? 16:28:12 there is a bunch of work to do there. 16:28:14 i'll speak to it. 16:28:46 that is "Essential" and will be accomplished to a satisfactory end. 16:29:06 nothing like a satisfactory ending 16:29:12 servercloud-q-juju-charms-release-policy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-juju-charms-release-policy 16:29:15 smoser: there are a couple bugs need to be addressed and other but currently blocked too due to 16:29:20 not having quantal support 16:30:03 SpamapS, that looks like yours. is there updates there? 16:30:37 servercloud-q-openstack-ha https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-ha 16:30:44 smoser: the two TODO's are still valid, and have to be completed this cycle. 16:30:56 SpamapS, thank you. 16:31:09 roaksoax, you're next there. ... i'm uguessing that one can stand some updates. 16:31:32 servercloud-q-juju-charm-unit-tests https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-juju-charm-unit-tests 16:31:32 was, 16:31:36 "juju charms for DRBD (adam_g says it is impossible, SpampS seems it is possible): TODO" resolved? 16:31:51 i think we need a steel cage for that one 16:31:52 we never have worked on it 16:32:02 but yeah I still believe its possible :) 16:32:03 hehe 16:32:09 SpamapS: go for it! 16:32:17 smoser: since I have been concentrated on maas the last two weeks I couldn't really advance any work on the HA stuff. But there are updates that need to be considered and will catch up with zul /adam_g as it relates to ha specific stuff for openstack 16:32:18 smoser: do you have capacity to prove us all wrong? 16:32:27 roaksoax, gracias. 16:32:55 i want no part of the SpamapS adam_g steel cage 16:32:55 drbd seems so old fashioned.. don't people just do RAID1 across volumes these days? 16:33:26 alright. i think that is enough there. 16:33:27 drbd is basically distributed raid1 16:33:32 * SpamapS would promise not to use his roundhouse 16:33:47 please do take a bit of time today and make sure your blueprints represent their actual state. 16:34:02 and remember that we're past beta1, and there is not much time remaining. 16:34:27 and miles to go before i sleep. 16:34:35 lets move on. 16:34:43 thank you Mr Moser. 16:34:48 #TOPIC Ubuntu Server Team Events 16:34:50 you are most welcome. 16:35:06 CFP Submissions: SoCal Linux Expo (Deadline: Dec. 10) http://www.socallinuxexpo.org/cfp 16:35:24 Anyone else travelling soon? 16:35:53 OpenStack Conference, San Diego, Oct 15-18, 2012 .. number of us going. 16:36:27 UDS, Copenhagen, Denmark , 29th Oct – 1st Nov 2012 16:36:34 Anything else? 16:36:45 #TOPIC Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) 16:37:20 Great to see we got Beta-1 out in reasonable shape, what is the plans between now and the next milestone for enrichment in testing? 16:37:57 Nobody from QA here? 16:38:06 btw, for events Surge is also coming up on Sept 27, and jimbaker is giving a Big Data meetup preso on Sept 19. 16:38:14 *sigh* 16:39:02 Okay, lets move frustratedly on. 16:39:12 [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb) 16:39:45 and no smb. 16:39:56 ogasawara: anyone from kernel here? 16:41:10 marvellous 16:41:19 [TOPiC] Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak) 16:41:26 rbask is on holiday 16:41:26 rbasak on holiday 16:41:40 Please, can someone cover this, before i shoot myself? 16:41:45 I think he synced up with smoser though 16:41:51 smoser: ^? 16:42:02 we are working on adding in ARM support int MAAS 16:42:06 that is the main effort 16:42:17 sure... 16:42:29 anything else of note 16:42:30 ? 16:42:37 rbasak has made considerable and impressive progresses on maas and arm. 16:42:49 \o/ 16:43:01 the ephemeral images were giving him pai, but he has hacked his way around that, and my reproduction of that has lead me to chasing some other issues in those images. 16:43:03 smoser: does it work with panda? 16:43:17 bug 1031065 16:43:19 Launchpad bug 1031065 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "cloud-init-nonet runs 'start networking' explicitly" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1031065 16:43:22 i do not believe it works with panda 16:43:27 what about qemu-system-arm-highbank ? 16:43:49 also, of interesting work there, dannf reportably can make things work with qemu-system-arm 16:44:04 qemu-system-arm -M highbank* 16:44:07 https://launchpad.net/~dannf/+archive/qemu-highbank/+packages 16:44:26 ping him for more info there. 16:44:27 that should be good in the archive now 16:44:46 The blocker for me, was a devicetree which is now fixed 16:44:50 last i spoke to him on it, he had a kernel that would boot, but the latest highbank kernel for precise would not. 16:45:15 okay, thanks smoser 16:45:16 but yeah, haivng some sort of qemu functional would be huge. 16:45:21 moving on? 16:45:32 #TOPIC Open Discussion 16:45:35 omap works pretty well 16:45:35 and ideally that can be booted with cloud images and cloud-localds 16:45:58 (but limited to 512M indeed) 16:46:16 ogra_: might want to grab you to help polish this stuff :) 16:46:23 feel free 16:46:42 ogra_: Would like to do a PXE boot via system-arm.. which might be interesting 16:46:49 Dunno if this was brought up in the bugs discussion, but Juju is a bit broken in quantal right now 16:47:16 SpamapS: oh? 16:47:20 There's a regression in python that hit yesterday, bug 1048710 16:47:22 Launchpad bug 1048710 in python3.2 (Ubuntu) "Regression in argparse for Python 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1048710 16:47:23 Barry Warsaw is on it 16:47:31 Daviey, qemu can boot our images out of the box (including the whole bootloader bits) so that shouldnt be any prob 16:47:52 Its pretty serious as it breaks the argparsing for all of juju's cli utilities 16:48:09 Joy 16:48:21 * Daviey ads it to tracking 16:48:21 anyway, I'm sure it will be resolved soon, but just a heads up that you may need to downgrade python2.7 if you want to have a working juju on quantal 16:48:50 Daviey: in case that bug does not fix it, there's also a juju bug, bug #1048864 , that is worth tracking 16:48:52 Launchpad bug 1048864 in juju (Ubuntu Quantal) "Latest python in quantal breaks juju test suite" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1048864 16:49:02 SpamapS: juju/precise archive + jitsu... Is it possible? 16:49:07 Daviey: it may end up being duped to 1048710 .. we'll see 16:49:21 SpamapS, thats on the release bugs list (both of them) 16:49:26 Daviey: we can put juju-jitsu in backports 16:49:40 jamespage: right, because I targetted at quantal 16:49:41 SpamapS: but does it work? 16:49:52 Daviey: It should. popey was looking at it. 16:50:02 SpamapS: he pinged me otherwise this morning :( 16:50:18 Daviey: bummer. Ok, we'll have to dive into that 16:50:24 thanks 16:50:31 Anything else? 16:51:06 Daviey: wild thing, I think you move me. 16:51:23 #TOPIC Announce next meeting date and time 16:51:34 18th, same time, same place 16:51:41 #ENDMEETING Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)