14:32 #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2021-03-02 14:32 Meeting started at 14:32:01 UTC. The chair is kenvandine. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:32 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:32 hey hey 14:32 Roll call: didrocks, duflu (out), jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, marcustomlinson, oSoMoN, seb128, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), hellsworth 14:32 o/ 14:32 \o 14:32 o/ 14:32 🐸/ 14:32 o/ 14:32 _o/ 14:32 i hope everyone is having a great March so far ;-D 14:32 let's dive right in 14:33 #topic rls-hh-bugs 14:33 nothing incoming 14:34 tracking is fine 14:35 #topic rls-gg-bugs 14:35 bug 1913333 14:35 bug 1913333 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "Calc auto-filter menu inaccessible with fractional scaling enabled" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1913333 14:36 i was unable to reproduce this one and wondered if Trevino had any thoughts 14:37 one report, not confirmed, -1 for rls for me 14:37 agreed 14:37 hellsworth: ping Trevinho after the meeting to see if he has ideas 14:37 we can definitely check it more, let's leave it around for reports 14:38 ok 14:39 bug 1914374 14:39 bug 1914374 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Multiple issues on HP ZBook 15 G7 after installing 20.04.2 image" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1914374 14:39 thats on gg tracking but not assigned 14:40 sounds like it should be assigned to that oem guy? 14:40 or tseliot_ 14:40 or wontfix for G, I doubt we care much about oem issues there? 14:41 yeah 14:41 the installer bit should be for sure 14:42 ubuntu-drivers is a bit dodgy because the versions go backwards 14:44 i think won't fix for both? 14:45 if i'm reading it right, it's all around what happens at install time 14:45 question is does this effect upgraders and is upgrades from LTS to non-LTS rls worthy? 14:47 it's fine to wontfix but tseliot_ still need to SRU something so that the versions are in the right order f < g < h, and I guess it might as well be this 14:48 bug 1915161 14:48 bug 1915161 in duplicity (Ubuntu Groovy) "deja dup won't restore a folder where name contains apostrophe and space" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915161 14:49 fix is upstream, do we want to SRU that patch? 14:50 I wouldn't bother about G at this point 14:50 time the SRU gets reviewed and verified we will be off to the next serie 14:50 ok +1 on that 14:51 well -1 on the bug :) 14:51 moving on 14:51 #topic rls-ff-bugs 14:53 bug 1883886 14:53 bug 1883886 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " Print dialogue's height in Libreoffice Writer is too high to see and click buttons." [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1883886 14:54 hellsworth: ^^ 14:54 it's marked fix commited? 14:54 yeah, but it's not 14:54 upstream yes 14:54 it was yes.. i admit that i didn't really understand the last comment 14:55 looks like it will be in 7.2 14:55 can ping ricotz about it 14:55 please do 14:55 it sounds worth queueing up for the next sru 14:55 i think the bug status needs to be changed 14:55 I would nominate and assign if you agree with that 14:55 fix committed feels wrong 14:55 depends how you use fix commited 14:55 I've always been using it for GNOME packages for when a fix is commited upstream 14:55 I think it's because Fix Released bugs stop showing up on any rls ff list 14:55 ok i'll change it to in progress and ping rico 14:56 best way to be able to follow up and close things with $nextupdate 14:56 it sounds like it is Fix Released but not in any stable series 14:56 right, it should be tracked for the SRU when 7.2 is released 14:56 imo 14:56 unsure if the change would apply easily to old series or if it's an UI change 14:56 when will 7.2 be released? 14:56 well then it can always be closed out again 14:57 will release in August 14:57 well, we are reviewing whether we accept is a rls item we want to try 14:57 my gut feeling is that it's not important enough to make it into our backlog realistically 14:58 would still be nice to fix but I would -1 for the rls nomination 14:58 i guess we know we'll get it in may 14:58 even without tracking it 14:58 not for focal 14:58 not to focal we won't 14:58 oh right 14:58 i think we should at least see how much work it would be to backport that patch 14:58 we need at some point to start balancing rls nominations approval to available resources to deal with what we accept 14:59 but that's not something we will resolve now 14:59 having the buttons off screen is hard to work around 14:59 that dialog doesn't scroll 14:59 i've battled this in the past myself :) 14:59 well for focal maybe it should be wont fix unless upstream backports the fix to the 6.4 branch 15:00 not ideal but you *can* hit enter even if you can't see the button and it will print 15:00 kenvandine, your call :) I agree it would be nice to fix, we would just need 30 people in the team to be able to fix all the 'would be nice to fix' issues we are crossing 15:01 it's also impacting only low vertical resolutions 15:01 which is not most users 15:01 anyway 15:01 affects only 4 folks in 6 months 15:01 we argued enough, we should just just decided +1 or -1 and move on 15:02 ok, -1 then 15:02 i would say -1 with the caveat that I'll ping rico and see what he thinks 15:02 it doesn't effect 768? 15:02 what is 768? 15:03 pixels high 15:03 looks like it does 15:03 1366x768 is one of the most common sizes 15:03 ok ty 15:03 one of the comments made me think it didn't fit on that 15:03 ok, moving on 15:05 tracking seems in order 15:05 #topic rls-bb-bugs 15:06 nothing incoming 15:06 tracking seems in order 15:06 #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 15:07 anything to be concerned with? 15:07 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 15:07 i see an eds transition, that's fun 15:08 right, indicator-datetime needs to be fixed 15:09 (I reported that upstream on https://github.com/AyatanaIndicators/ayatana-indicator-datetime/issues/23 also) 15:09 some minors rebuilts still needed 15:09 thanks 15:09 poppler is ready to migrate once libreoffice 7.1.1 gets uploaded hopefully 15:10 there was some request to ignore the test and let it migrated but that didn't get acked 15:10 other are flaky tests mostly 15:10 but 7.1.1 is in proposed already 15:10 oh you mean uploaded to the archive 15:10 no 15:10 Rico stacked the fix in the packaging vcs 15:11 but he said he wouldn't do another upload before 7.1.1 proper, we currently have a ~rc 15:11 kenvandine, I think we can move on, there is nothing that needs to be assigned at this point afaik 15:11 things are being worked on or need a retry 15:11 ok 15:11 #topic aob 15:13 going once 15:13 twice 15:13 ok, thanks folks 15:13 #endmeeting